Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion We dont have to JUSTIFY our MISOGINY

Albertopenheimer

Albertopenheimer

change ur pfp to this its only a matter of time
★★★
Joined
Feb 4, 2025
Posts
1,291
I really thought much about the question wheter theres a need to justify it or not. But i came to the conclusion that we dont have to, heres

At the beginning i thought that if you like woman (heterosexuality) and the question is about emotions,
emotions should be used as arguments
But on the other hand there are also non-emotional arguments that speak for misoginy.
And thats where i got confused because
theres always only 1 true answer
still getting 2 equaly strong arguments
But i realized that emotions arent valid in the first place, meaning non emotional arguments are stronger (which fought the soy thesis)
But than i thought about what phiolosophy was appliable to the conclusion of having two possibly true thesis
1745929502306

So i ended up with this possibility stick:
1745929401395

But no matter what, you could keep the possibility stick growing,
making it effectively infinitly long
and since infinity doesnt have an end, it makes it a rl hard question.
So i looked at the details and noticed
that no matter at what "site" you look, the misoginistic one alway meta mogs the soy one,
(what i mean with "site):
1745928181311

meaning that the misoginistic one makes more sense

and yh, the title was KINDA clickbait
 

Attachments

  • 1745929442000.png
    1745929442000.png
    15.1 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
I really thought much about the question wheter theres a need to justify it or not. But i came to the conclusion that we dont have to, heres

At the beginning i thought that if you like woman (heterosexuality) and the question is about emotions,
emotions should be used as arguments
But on the other hand there are also non-emotional arguments that speak for misoginy.
And thats where i got confused because
theres always only 1 true answer
still getting 2 equaly strong arguments
But i realized that emotions arent valid in the first place, meaning non emotional arguments are stronger (which applied to the soy thought)
But than i thought about what phiolosophy was appliable to the conclusion of having two possibly true thesis
1745927514130

So i ended up with this possibility stick:
1745927737533

But no matter what, you could keep the possibility stick growing,
making it effectively infinitly long
and since infinity doesnt have an end, it makes it a rl hard question.
So i looked at the details and noticed
that no matter at what "site" you look, the misoginistic one alway meta mogs the soy one,
(what i mean with "site):
1745928181311

meaning that the misoginistic one makes more sense

and yh, the title was KINDA clickbait
dnr + i hate women
 
@Uggo Mongo worth pinning?
 

Similar threads

Albertopenheimer
Replies
5
Views
57
Albertopenheimer
Albertopenheimer
DarkStar
Replies
6
Views
289
Emba
Emba
Lifeisbullshit95
Replies
2
Views
122
SuperKanga.Belgrade
SuperKanga.Belgrade
InMemoriam
Replies
49
Views
4K
InMemoriam
InMemoriam

Users who are viewing this thread

  • shape1
    shape2
    shape3
    shape4
    shape5
    shape6
    Back
    Top