Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel We are stronger than chads + females combined

currycel102

currycel102

currycel
★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2021
Posts
1,106
At a certain point in human history, only the top 20% of men bred with 100% of the women. Both chads and females were satisfied with this arrangement. But the bottom 80% of men was not satisfied. So, that's how monogamy came to be.
Incels and normies decided that they shouldn't just be beta slaves, and everyone should each have one woman of their own -- chad has to share.
Women don't like this arrangement. Chad doesn't like this arrangement.
But it did not matter. 80% of bottom tier men are stronger than 20% top tier men + all women.

Unfortunately the difference now is that instead of incels and normies teaming together to take chad's portions to share equally, normies want to beat down on incels in the hopes that they can get chad's leftovers. This will not stop until the hypergamy situation goes back to these animalistic times, when even a normie can't get a female.
 
Last edited:
This is true. We just need to find our entryway into actually doing something about it.
 
At a certain point in human history, only the top 20% of men bred with 100% of the women. Both chads and females were satisfied with this arrangement. But the bottom 80% of men was not satisfied. So, that's how monogamy came to be.
Incels and normies decided that they shouldn't just be beta slaves, and everyone should each have one woman of their own -- chad has to share.
Women don't like this arrangement. Chad doesn't like this arrangement.
But it did not matter. 80% of bottom tier men are stronger than 20% top tier men + all women.
Chad can have the ladies while we acquire wealth and power. Together we're unstoppable. If we just live pragmatically, work together, and don't cave in to social pressures or manipulative foids, we could rule Chad, his women, and his kids as slaves. This is not unlike how the Jew came to thrive despite being the most stigmatized group in the middle ages. The kikes became shrewd businessmen who amassed wealth while Europeans rested on their laurels. We must adopt their ways and use them for good.

Funny thing is that we outnumber them and outgun them. The only reason Chad and the foids thrive is because we allow them to. We could build a new society where we are on top.
 
Last edited:
This is true. We just need to find our entryway into actually doing something about it.
You can refer to it as "accelerationism," but at a certain point, the average 5/10 normie is going to be stuck single. He's going to wake up one day and not blame muh misogynistic incels for all the problems in life, and he's going to start blaming women.
It's pretty simple, if a man contributes to society, he must get something out of it in return, namely pussy. Otherwise, he is content with society's dysfunction or collapse. Men will no longer protect women, serve as police, serve in the military, or anything.
Society will become so animalistic and hypergamous, that a newfound cooperation among normies and incels will form -- this will dominate politics and culture.

Overall, incels can't win alone. Right now, we're still at the fringes of society, probably like 20% of those in the West. But we're rapidly growing.
 
Chad can have the ladies while we acquire wealth and power. Together we're unstoppable. If we just live pragmatically, work together, and don't cave in to social pressures or manipulative foids, we could rule Chad, his women, and his kids as slaves. This is not unlike how the Jew came to thrive despite being the most stigmatized race in the middle ages. The kikes became shrewd businessmen who amassed wealth. We must adopt their ways and use them for good.
Well I figure that the initial stages of agriculture were like this: "Okay chad, you can get all the power. You can even get access to more women generally. But in return, if we fight for you, we need to get at least one woman each. Create this concept called "marriage" so we can protect our bonds with our woman."
We're not going to end up pulling the strings or anything and being 1% of the population with disproportionate power. We're just going to be growing and growing in absolute size until we can't be ignored anymore. Chads and women will have to compromise with us.
 
Well I figure that the initial stages of agriculture were like this: "Okay chad, you can get all the power. You can even get access to more women generally. But in return, if we fight for you, we need to get at least one woman each. Create this concept called "marriage" so we can protect our bonds with our woman."
So I take it that you're using this to get an idea of the permanent, fixed structure of the relationship between incels, Chad, and the cattle.
We're not going to end up pulling the strings or anything and being 1% of the population with disproportionate power.
I disagree. Human nature may not change but we have seen how human societies change as different circumstances and technology come about. Look at how the internet has taken away the power of the press and govt propaganda. Look at how sexuality itself has changed as technology has improved and birth control has become common. We've already seen how the antisocial nerds like Bill Gates (fuck that kike but he did grow up as an outcast), the late Steve Jobs, and Elon Musk have become the most powerful figures on Earth. For most of human history only the Chad warlords achieved such levels of power.

Now I don't know if we'll come to have a higher status than the Chads or rule them or anything, but I merely said that we could theoretically if we actually banded together and tried. Not that this would happen.
We're just going to be growing and growing in absolute size until we can't be ignored anymore. Chads and women will have to compromise with us.
This is similar to the thinking of Whatifalthist, but I think this is wrong. As long as we have a roof over our heads and an internet where we can vent our frustrations, there won't be any demands met, no matter how many of us there are.

With that, as dictated by natural selection, Chad's offspring will replace us and our potential offspring, and they won't have any issue finding women since they'll inherit Chad's traits. If anything, we are living through the part of history where our kind is annihilated. So many changes have happened since agricultural society began thousands of years ago when what you described above began. There is neither a need for nor room for us. We see how civilization can keep running even when Stacy is living off of welfare to sustain her and her 10 illicit children. At any other point in history such a society would've collapsed quickly, but today there is such massive abundance that this is no longer a problem.

Our existence is the result of measures that were taken in a time when there was no other solution to keep the world functioning but to carefully regulate procreation. This artificial distribution just isn't needed anymore. There's no incentive to keep it.



The only way we can survive is if thrive. We must achieve power and take Chad out of power. Otherwise we will go extinct. This is the new kill-or-be killed world we live in. A technologically advanced stone-age where only the strongest survive.
 
Last edited:
You can refer to it as "accelerationism," but at a certain point, the average 5/10 normie is going to be stuck single. He's going to wake up one day and not blame muh misogynistic incels for all the problems in life, and he's going to start blaming women.
It's pretty simple, if a man contributes to society, he must get something out of it in return, namely pussy. Otherwise, he is content with society's dysfunction or collapse. Men will no longer protect women, serve as police, serve in the military, or anything.
Society will become so animalistic and hypergamous, that a newfound cooperation among normies and incels will form -- this will dominate politics and culture.

Overall, incels can't win alone. Right now, we're still at the fringes of society, probably like 20% of those in the West. But we're rapidly growing.
Unfortunately, mercenaries are increasingly displacing the classic army from military conflicts + the development of technology increasingly reduces the need to participate in real battles, while developing drones that can be controlled sitting kilometers away from the action. No one will share a pussy, everyone will just be forced to fight with a stick, not a carrot. Ukrainian incels are simply caught on the street and forcibly sent to the army, otherwise threatening to send them to prison for 10 years.
 
Well I figure that the initial stages of agriculture were like this: "Okay chad, you can get all the power. You can even get access to more women generally. But in return, if we fight for you, we need to get at least one woman each. Create this concept called "marriage" so we can protect our bonds with our woman."
We're not going to end up pulling the strings or anything and being 1% of the population with disproportionate power. We're just going to be growing and growing in absolute size until we can't be ignored anymore. Chads and women will have to compromise with us.
No one shares a cunt with Ukrainian soldiers, they are simply forced to fight with threats and force. The same thing will happen everywhere, the army will turn into a composition of 50% of those who fight for money and 50% of slaves who were forced to fight against their will.
 
So I take it that you're using this to get an idea of the permanent, fixed structure of the relationship between incels, Chad, and the cattle.

I disagree. Human nature may not change but we have seen how human societies change as different circumstances and technology come about. Look at how the internet has taken away the power of the press and govt propaganda. Look at how sexuality itself has changed as technology has improved and birth control has become common. We've already seen how the antisocial nerds like Bill Gates (fuck that kike but he did grow up as an outcast), the late Steve Jobs, and Elon Musk have become the most powerful figures on Earth. For most of human history only the Chad warlords achieved such levels of power.

Now I don't know if we'll come to have a higher status than the Chads or rule them or anything, but I merely said that we could theoretically if we actually banded together and tried. Not that this would happen.

This is similar to the thinking of Whatifalthist, but I think this is wrong. As long as we have a roof over our heads and an internet where we can vent our frustrations, there won't be any demands met, no matter how many of us there are.

With that, as dictated by natural selection, Chad's offspring will replace us and our potential offspring, and they won't have any issue finding women since they'll inherit Chad's traits. If anything, we are living through the part of history where our kind is annihilated. So many changes have happened since agricultural society began thousands of years ago when what you described above began. There is neither a need for nor room for us. We see how civilization can keep running even when Stacy is living off of welfare to sustain her and her 10 illicit children. At any other point in history such a society would've collapsed quickly, but today there is such massive abundance that this is no longer a problem.

Our existence is the result of measures that were taken in a time when there was no other solution to keep the world functioning but to carefully regulate procreation. This artificial distribution just isn't needed anymore. There's no incentive to keep it.



The only way we can survive is if thrive. We must achieve power and take Chad out of power. Otherwise we will go extinct. This is the new kill-or-be killed world we live in. A technologically advanced stone-age where only the strongest survive.
Nah, genetics is random. Even if Chad fucks the average Becky, his son may become an incel due to the fact that he received most of the genes from the maternal line. If this shit worked, we wouldn't exist. Most of us have genes derived from our mothers.
 
Incels will continue to appear even after 20 years, as the bottom 80% of foids will reproduce and pass on their disgusting genes.
So I take it that you're using this to get an idea of the permanent, fixed structure of the relationship between incels, Chad, and the cattle.

I disagree. Human nature may not change but we have seen how human societies change as different circumstances and technology come about. Look at how the internet has taken away the power of the press and govt propaganda. Look at how sexuality itself has changed as technology has improved and birth control has become common. We've already seen how the antisocial nerds like Bill Gates (fuck that kike but he did grow up as an outcast), the late Steve Jobs, and Elon Musk have become the most powerful figures on Earth. For most of human history only the Chad warlords achieved such levels of power.

Now I don't know if we'll come to have a higher status than the Chads or rule them or anything, but I merely said that we could theoretically if we actually banded together and tried. Not that this would happen.

This is similar to the thinking of Whatifalthist, but I think this is wrong. As long as we have a roof over our heads and an internet where we can vent our frustrations, there won't be any demands met, no matter how many of us there are.

With that, as dictated by natural selection, Chad's offspring will replace us and our potential offspring, and they won't have any issue finding women since they'll inherit Chad's traits. If anything, we are living through the part of history where our kind is annihilated. So many changes have happened since agricultural society began thousands of years ago when what you described above began. There is neither a need for nor room for us. We see how civilization can keep running even when Stacy is living off of welfare to sustain her and her 10 illicit children. At any other point in history such a society would've collapsed quickly, but today there is such massive abundance that this is no longer a problem.

Our existence is the result of measures that were taken in a time when there was no other solution to keep the world functioning but to carefully regulate procreation. This artificial distribution just isn't needed anymore. There's no incentive to keep it.



The only way we can survive is if thrive. We must achieve power and take Chad out of power. Otherwise we will go extinct. This is the new kill-or-be killed world we live in. A technologically advanced stone-age where only the strongest survive.
 
Nah, genetics is random. Even if Chad fucks the average Becky, his son may become an incel due to the fact that he received most of the genes from the maternal line. If this shit worked, we wouldn't exist. Most of us have genes derived from our mothers.
Gene inheritance is 50-50. Half of it is Chad's genes. Now since 1 Chad can fuck millions of Beckies and Stacies in a lifetime, and each kid then is at least slightly more Chadlike each generation, Chad's genes could completely take over after only a few generations.
 
Incels will continue to appear even after 20 years, as the bottom 80% of foids will reproduce and pass on their disgusting genes.
But since only Chad fucks them, the kids only inherit his genes and get better with each generation. Now this process has been accelerated and Chad will take over the gene pool faster than ever.
 
Gene inheritance is 50-50. Half of it is Chad's genes. Now since 1 Chad can fuck millions of Beckies and Stacies in a lifetime, and each kid then is at least slightly more Chadlike each generation, Chad's genes could completely take over after only a few generations.
Nah, hypergamy is endless, like the Mariana Trench or a black hole. Appearance and parameters have inflation. The notion of who Chad is is going to rise like house prices. If today for foids male height should be at least 180 cm, then in 10 years it will be 190 cm, and in 20 years it will be 200 cm.
 
But since only Chad fucks them, the kids only inherit his genes and get better with each generation. Now this process has been accelerated and Chad will take over the gene pool faster than ever.
If we had a time machine and we were transported back at least to the early 2000s, we would ascend.
 
No one shares a cunt with Ukrainian soldiers, they are simply forced to fight with threats and force. The same thing will happen everywhere, the army will turn into a composition of 50% of those who fight for money and 50% of slaves who were forced to fight against their will.
:feelshaha: :feelshaha: :feelshaha: :feelshaha: :blackpill::blackpill::blackpill::blackpill::blackpill::feelsLSD::feelsLSD::feelsLSD::feelsLSD:
 
But since only Chad fucks them, the kids only inherit his genes and get better with each generation. Now this process has been accelerated and Chad will take over the gene pool faster than ever.
The concept of who Chad is is changing. If at first I heard that the top 20% get pussy on dating sites, today most of the pussy is taken only by the top 5%.
 
Nah, hypergamy is endless, like the Mariana Trench or a black hole. Appearance and parameters have inflation. The notion of who Chad is is going to rise like house prices. If today for foids male height should be at least 180 cm, then in 10 years it will be 190 cm, and in 20 years it will be 200 cm.
I doubt it. Women's brains did not evolve to see men in relative terms like that. They're too stupid and nearsighted to sniff out the best man (in most cases). Any man with big muscles and a crewcut will get a woman in the future because he'll have enough attractiveness and charisma to trigger the women's instincts and send them into heat.
 
The concept of who Chad is is changing. If at first I heard that the top 20% get pussy on dating sites, today most of the pussy is taken only by the top 5%.
No, women still fall for attractive guys on the street. I've seen it first hand, at restaurants, stores, work, school, etc... Women are very stupid creatures, you see. All it takes is a man who has muscles and a conventionally attractive style and the rest is history.
 
With that, as dictated by natural selection, Chad's offspring will replace us and our potential offspring, and they won't have any issue finding women since they'll inherit Chad's traits.
In any society where unchecked hypergamy exists, incels will exist. It's always that the bottom 80% of men will be somewhat undesirable. Even if the average height is 6'4, there will always be a bottom 80%. Even chad's kids are actually likely end up incel, probably through just random chance, if there is just unchecked hypergamy.

Another point you talk about is how we have roofs over our heads so nothing will really change -- in my opinion our current society is much more fragile than you think. It takes the cooperation of billions of MEN for society to function, from the internet, to food, to water, to safety. I legitimately think that you cant just force from the top down safety for everyone without the cooperation of 80% of the male population.

It's an interesting discussion though, pessimistic vs optimistic viewpoints
 
In any society where unchecked hypergamy exists, incels will exist. It's always that the bottom 80% of men will be somewhat undesirable. Even if the average height is 6'4, there will always be a bottom 80%. Even chad's kids are actually likely end up incel, probably through just random chance, if there is just unchecked hypergamy.

Another point you talk about is how we have roofs over our heads so nothing will really change -- in my opinion our current society is much more fragile than you think. It takes the cooperation of billions of MEN for society to function, from the internet, to food, to water, to safety. I legitimately think that you cant just force from the top down safety for everyone without the cooperation of 80% of the male population.

It's an interesting discussion though, pessimistic vs optimistic viewpoints

I doubt it. Women's brains did not evolve to see men in relative terms like that. They're too stupid and nearsighted to sniff out the best man (in most cases). Any man with big muscles and a crewcut will get a woman in the future because he'll have enough attractiveness and charisma to trigger the women's instincts and send them into heat.
Now regarding technology (or as you put it, roofs over our heads), the thing is that, much of the workforce can already be replaced with automation. Very little human labor is actually needed anymore for humans to survive. The only reason we don't automate the economy is because we don't want to take away people's jobs.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

tehgymcel420
Replies
13
Views
353
IngsocSimp
IngsocSimp
ApexLegendscel
Replies
12
Views
347
ApexLegendscel
ApexLegendscel
Liu KANG
Replies
66
Views
773
faded.belgradestein
faded.belgradestein
Deep.Nest
Replies
39
Views
748
Deep.Nest
Deep.Nest

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top