"we're invading White countries for what they did in the past! Karma for their colonialism!"
I'm sure we've all heard this peddled on Twitter/X by SJWs & the like, so here's why I will explain it's a very poor & weak "argument"
Firstly, It implies that Whites were the only ones to do this, which isn't true:
-Ottoman Empire, founded by Turks which ruled most of the MENA region & invaded the Balkans.
-The various Caliphates, which invaded parts of North Africa & even Europe: They also de-facto ruled India for 800 years.
-The various iterations of the Persian Empire(first was the Achaemenid)
-Mongols, who had the second largest Empire after the Anglos, and also massacred entire cities just cause.
-The Japanese Empire
The list could go on really. Essentially, due to both the intellect & creativity Whites/Europeans posses combined with the geographical advantage, Whites were the only ones competent enough to do it on the scale it was done at.
On the matter of slavery, the truth is it was performed by every civilization, race, etc. within history.
In fact, the MENA slave-trade was arguably much larger & worse.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
It's also worth noting that many Balkaners, Slavs, and even Celts & Nordics were taken & sold into slavery by Barbary pirates & the such. African tribal leaders sold other tribes into slavery; similarly many Indian princes also willingly sided with the Anglos.
Secondly, some groups of Whites were conquered & oppressed throughout history, both by Whites & non-Whites alike.
Which is another point- what did the Celts & Slavs ever do to Shitskins? If anything, both of these groups were subjugated themselves: Celts also were constantly driven out of their lands by Germanics, and nowadays are a small minority of Whites.
Thirdly, most non-White/non-European countries always were generally worse off, regardless of wether Whites invaded or not.
Africa was always a shithole, as was India.
The Natives massacred each other, and lived very tribalistic lives hardly comparable to that of Eurasians centuries before the first Whites even set-foot on the continent.
Granted, I will be fair & say that the MENA region in present times was doing quite well before ZOG invaded Iraq & the such: East Asia, despite being decimated by some wars, was able to rebuild at the least.
And ofc as always, Jews are involved in this replacement/mass-migration.
These are just some hypothetical questions & facts ofc, that easily dispute that garbage narrative pushed by non-Whites/Europeans & SJW types justifying what's going on.
I'm sure we've all heard this peddled on Twitter/X by SJWs & the like, so here's why I will explain it's a very poor & weak "argument"
Firstly, It implies that Whites were the only ones to do this, which isn't true:
-Ottoman Empire, founded by Turks which ruled most of the MENA region & invaded the Balkans.
-The various Caliphates, which invaded parts of North Africa & even Europe: They also de-facto ruled India for 800 years.
-The various iterations of the Persian Empire(first was the Achaemenid)
-Mongols, who had the second largest Empire after the Anglos, and also massacred entire cities just cause.
-The Japanese Empire
The list could go on really. Essentially, due to both the intellect & creativity Whites/Europeans posses combined with the geographical advantage, Whites were the only ones competent enough to do it on the scale it was done at.
On the matter of slavery, the truth is it was performed by every civilization, race, etc. within history.
In fact, the MENA slave-trade was arguably much larger & worse.
Trans-Saharan slave trade - Wikipedia
Indian Ocean slave trade - Wikipedia
It's also worth noting that many Balkaners, Slavs, and even Celts & Nordics were taken & sold into slavery by Barbary pirates & the such. African tribal leaders sold other tribes into slavery; similarly many Indian princes also willingly sided with the Anglos.
Secondly, some groups of Whites were conquered & oppressed throughout history, both by Whites & non-Whites alike.
Which is another point- what did the Celts & Slavs ever do to Shitskins? If anything, both of these groups were subjugated themselves: Celts also were constantly driven out of their lands by Germanics, and nowadays are a small minority of Whites.
Thirdly, most non-White/non-European countries always were generally worse off, regardless of wether Whites invaded or not.
Africa was always a shithole, as was India.
The Natives massacred each other, and lived very tribalistic lives hardly comparable to that of Eurasians centuries before the first Whites even set-foot on the continent.
Granted, I will be fair & say that the MENA region in present times was doing quite well before ZOG invaded Iraq & the such: East Asia, despite being decimated by some wars, was able to rebuild at the least.
And ofc as always, Jews are involved in this replacement/mass-migration.
These are just some hypothetical questions & facts ofc, that easily dispute that garbage narrative pushed by non-Whites/Europeans & SJW types justifying what's going on.
