In all seriousness though lyrics aside it's a damn good song.
In all seriousness though lyrics aside it's a damn good song.
cope. roasties want a beta to provide after they hit the wall and want to settle down with kids. heard of the dual mating strategy theory?
Yep.
They don't want that; they just settle for it because Chad won't commit to them (also why they usually cheat on the betabux). What they want is a rich popular Gigachad much like the song basically says. Only prime 10/10 model/actress Stacies can actually get such a man to commit to them however, and regular women frame it all as some kind of deep tragedy. What's worse? Society sympathizes with such sentiments because that's how cucked we are.
The twist is that even blond-haired, blue-eyed, and 6'2" ends up not being good enough for our ghoulish, sclerotic vixen.
true.
There are studies that prove women are far more attracted to beta males as partners when they are far off from ovulating than when they are ovulating or close to it (when they are actually horny). But of course when they do ovulate they are far more likely to cheat on their betabux with chad or tyrone.
(normie beta is more likely to marry than a chad)
https://incels.is/threads/correlati...dies-supports-betabux-alpha-fux-theory.64982/
but of course a provider chad is optimal, but too excessively rare and not that much better than a good betabux, especially one who lets you cuck him (which alot of betabuxes do these days).
Do I should be in luck, at 55
It's over for society
Attachments
Hadn't seen that. Again though it just shows how female-dominated our society has become. Jusy imagine if any man made this song:
"I'm holding out for a Stacy
Holding out for a Stacy till the end of the night
She's got to be tall and she's got to be blonde and she's got to be nubile and tight"
I can hear all the cries of "mithogyny!" already.
The composer and singer if not the same would be mercilessly attacked and a few dumbos might even threaten them. Video sites that hosted such a song would be petitioned to remove it and give in.
Again, it's insane what the gynocracy is able to get away with. This is peak objectification of men right here. For a laugh, ever read reviews of "hair metal" albums by proto-numale "rock" critics of the early 90's? Typically they're applauding the end of a "misogynistic" era that "objectified women." This shit makes all that - even most rap - look like nothing. I say we bring back "objectification" of women in music because I'm sick of this shit all over the place and still being told every damn day that THEY'RE the "objectified" and the "oppressed." Give me a fucking break.
Those studies are just made up liberal propaganda so that sub-8's don't kill themselves (or go ER) en masse. Have to keep the machine running.
Well those aren't very good propaganda pieces then, because it is a major blackpill. It confirms betabux alphafux. It shows that women are often not truly attracted to the man that they married, just that they need a walking atm machine.
How else do you explain how all those soyboys at IT are talking about "the wife?" You think like 20% of the sub are larping husbands?
And even not looking at the studies, I remember watching a buzzfeed video (I pray to blackops2cel for forgiveness) where the "try guys" were testing out who is more attractive
for sexual attraction and decision for one night stands, it correlated completely with testosterone. However, when those same women were asked who they would want to marry, they picked the guy who had the lowest T and was lowest for one night stand decision, aka the guy to the right of the chang. They said he seem more loving and would make a better father, be more loyal, etc. Of course they just mean better cuck and betabux for marriage. And they picked the chang last for marriage material, when he was their first pick for one night stand.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
