It's Over Trucel realization: even with a billion euros I couldn't ascend (in a legit way)

[Divergent_Integral]

Sure, if I'd wake up tomorrow with a billion euros in my bank account, I'd be pleased. At first.

As for my inceldom, the easiest thing to do in such a scenario would be to buy a 10/10 Stacy escort to suck my dick 24/7. But although that would be nice, it'd just be piain old escortmaxxing at the end of the day; not legit ascension. I might even find a foid who would accept my diamond ring and my lavish betabux . But who says she wouldn't divorce me at the first opportunity? Even with the most stringent prenup in place, she'd walk away with a couple of million guaranteed.

Surgerymax? Yes, but only to an extent. Even the most talented surgeons can only do so much if the underlying bone structure is suboptimal. Even the dreaded leg-lengthening procedure would add at most a couple of inches to my diminutive 5'3" frame. I'd still be way below the mark.

The truth is even a billion euros couldn't wipe out my disability and otherwise poor genetics. Nor my autism and its associated lack of refined social skills.

At most, it would buy me a comfortable life on my own. I'd hire a butler and a cook to do all the onerous daily chores for me. Perhaps I'd even set up a private physics lab and try to become the next Nikola Tesla. But I'd still be without a wife. Money is nice, but it can't accomplish everything.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

 

[highinhibition]

Living in Europe as a rice must have fried your brains fellow ethnic cel (I am curry in Germany just nearby)
1 Billion euros is so much money you couldnt lose it even if you wanted to and you could literally do everything you want and bend reality at your will
_____

Esp as something as relatively mundane as getting pussy

 

[ShowerTaker]

Michael Bloomberg is a billionaire and his billions of dollars couldn't save him from being mogged by Donald Trump due to his short height.


View: https://youtu.be/kfl13QyQZKc

 

[IncelWithHate]

To be fair, most normies are in this position. If they couldn't betabuxx they wouldn't be much better off than we are.

Not sure why you'd be bothered at the prospect of not being able to attain a wife. Even rich chads who get married in this gynocentric system are beyond idiotic.

 

[metabuxx]

No money for your face

 

[Divergent_Integral]

Living in Europe as a rice must have fried your brains fellow ethnic cel (I am curry in Germany just nearby)
1 Billion euros is so much money you couldnt lose it even if you wanted to and you could literally do everything you want and bend reality at your will
_____

Esp as something as relatively mundane as getting pussy

Can't you read? I know that getting pussy is easy, even with a lot less than a billion euros. But a wife who genuinely loves you? Impossible, unless you're Chad.

The true is that there is NO way to compensate for not being Chad. Not money, not PUA training, not surgery, not superior skills at anything, just nothing.

 

[highinhibition]

Can't you read? I know that getting pussy is easy, even with a lot less than a billion euros. But a wife who genuinely loves you? Impossible, unless you're Chad.

The true is that there is NO way to compensate for not being Chad. Not money, not PUA training, not surgery, not superior skills at anything, just nothing.

with a billion euro they will act so well that you wouldnt mind the difference

with a billion euro you have access to jewish operations which you would normaly label as conspiracy

with a billion euro you could import concubines and lobotomy their brain and pump their hearts with love potions

 

[Divergent_Integral]

with a billion euro they will act so well that you wouldnt mind the difference

with a billion euro you have access to jewish operations which you would normaly label as conspiracy

with a billion euro you could import concubines and lobotomy their brain and pump their hearts with love potions

If that is so, then why did Jeff Bezos's wife divorce him?

 

[Caesercel]

If I had a billion dollars in my bank account pussy would be the last thing on my mind.

 

[Unlucky coalition]

Michael Bloomberg is a billionaire and his billions of dollars couldn't save him from being mogged by Donald Trump due to his short height.


View: https://youtu.be/kfl13QyQZKc

Brutal there is no millions for your height

 

[highinhibition]

If that is so, then why did Jeff Bezos's wife divorce him?

Because iz the jews showbusiness
An easy and digestable story for the public
Something completely different and inhumane happened most likely behind closed doors
It's like when a CEO "resigns" from his position

 

[IncelWithHate]

But a wife who genuinely loves you? Impossible, unless you're Chad.

I dispute the notion of women being able to love men, even if its Chad. I am envious of women's visceral, raw lust and submission for chad but I see no evidence they love even men they find attractive. At best women can have a deep respect for the man they are with, but they are too selfish and mercenary to really love anyone. Even women loving children is up for dispute, seeing as they are statistically the most likely to abuse and even murder them (not including abortion). They have no issue with using children as meal tickets in child support/welfare/divorce proceedings and denying men visitation purely out of spite.

 

[highinhibition]

I dispute the notion of women being able to love men, even if its Chad. I am envious of women's visceral, raw lust and submission for chad but I see no evidence they love even men they find attractive. At best women can have a deep respect for the man they are with, but they are too selfish and mercenary to really love anyone. Even women loving children is up for dispute, seeing as they are statistically the most likely to abuse and even murder them (not including abortion). They have no issue with using children as meal tickets in child support/welfare/divorce proceedings and denying men visitation purely out of spite.

High IQ

OP forget my stupid babble and focus on the serious oppostion here

 

[Divergent_Integral]

I dispute the notion of women being able to love men, even if its Chad. I am envious of women's visceral, raw lust and submission for chad but I see no evidence they love even men they find attractive. At best women can have a deep respect for the man they are with, but they are too selfish and mercenary to really love anyone. Even women loving children is up for dispute, seeing as they are statistically the most likely to abuse and even murder them (not including abortion). They have no issue with using children as meal tickets in child support/welfare/divorce proceedings and denying men visitation purely out of spite.

So basically a betabuxxer is paying for really nice and elaborate play acting, is that what you're saying?

 

[IncelWithHate]

So basically a betabuxxer is paying for really nice and elaborate play acting, is that what you're saying?

No, because wives commonly disrespect their betabuxx husbands anyway. They don't have to capitulate to the men they're married to because a) men and society are gynocentric and will tolerate bad behavior from women and b) marriage allows the women to strongarm and threaten the man financially.

Marriage is essentially sophisticated prostitution that may or may not involve children. Romanticism is actually a fairly recent concept in regards to it.

 

[highinhibition]

OP there is a big shift happening even boomer billionaires are affected

Gone is the time of romance, marriage and love

All those things have been exposed for what they truely are

Billionaires burned their fingers already

All those things like trust,love,passion or whatever are nothing but a sex fantasy

And you dont have to be a billionaire to approach this urge in a complete different way

And if you seek the so called love i.e female is highly dependant on you

you can get it, especially if you are a billionaire

Also an incel could get it but would have to get rid off his bluepilled and outdated beliefs and MOVE to a country and use his money

that is not yet completely cucked

 

[curryboy420]

At least I could move to a busy city full of young people to max my chances. Better than rotting in mums house as a loser and better than wage slaving for a shit apartment in a dead town full of oldies

 

[OwlGod]

I'd use of my immeasurably high IQ to gain a harem by coercion, how? I'd create a modelling agency with my money, all hired female models would instantly submit to me.

 

[LeDepravedCel]

I know that getting pussy is easy, even with a lot less than a billion euros. But a wife who genuinely loves you? Impossible, unless you're Chad.

High IQ. What I want in a girl is genuine love and no amount of hookers could give me that.

 

[OwlGod]

I dispute the notion of women being able to love men, even if its Chad. I am envious of women's visceral, raw lust and submission for chad but I see no evidence they love even men they find attractive. At best women can have a deep respect for the man they are with, but they are too selfish and mercenary to really love anyone.

you just described love, or the most important initial aspect of it. lust is necessary for mating, caring and affection. submission means one has power over another, and if the submissive person doesn't intervene, counteract, or abrogate then she's doing ,,self-sacrifice" and passing total baston control.

Even women loving children is up for dispute, seeing as they are statistically the most likely to abuse and even murder them (not including abortion). They have no issue with using children as meal tickets in child support/welfare/divorce proceedings and denying men visitation purely out of spite.

maternal instincts pretty much refutes this. I feel as if you're using the word ,,love" in the voluntarily controlled sense, It's not something that we possess control over. If women didn't love their children then they wouldn't breastfeed nor raise them. It would makes no sense unless you come up with an even more nebulous improbable theory.

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

High IQ. What I want in a girl is genuine love and no amount of hookers could give me that.

 

[BRMonkecell]

There is no such a thing as "genuine love", It's literally your brain pumping out hormones to trick you and that can be stopped by multiple factors.

You want genuine eternal love? Sorry bro, that doesn't exist outside Disney's crappy movies.

 

[Cope_Time]

If I had a billion dollars in my bank account pussy would be the last thing on my mind.

tbh, hire some escort tbh

 

[Caesercel]

I don't think most people here comprehend how much a billion dollars even are. Imagine having that and crying about some true love bullshit. If I had that all my problems would be officially over.

 

[IncelWithHate]

you just described love, or the most important initial aspect of it. lust is necessary for mating, caring and affection. submission means one has power over another, and if the submissive person doesn't intervene, counteract, or abrogate then she's doing ,,self-sacrifice" and passing total baston control.

No. I didn't. You even refuted the point you were trying to make, so I'm not sure what you hoped to achieve with that comment.

maternal instincts pretty much refutes this. I feel as if you're using the word ,,love" in the voluntarily controlled sense, It's not something that we possess control over. If women didn't love their children then they wouldn't breastfeed nor raise them. It would makes no sense unless you come up with an even more nebulous improbable theory.

It doesn't refute anything. The fact women statistically abuse children more and use them as leverage for their own personal game invalidates any of this schlock about 'maternal instinct'.

Cats and lower animals will also provide their offspring with milk. They are also known for killing their own kittens or abandoning them. It merely proves they operate on evolutionary instinct. BTW, large numbers of women can't even bothered to breastfeed.

If women carried about children specifically, they wouldn't become single mothers and they wouldn't alienate perfectly fine husbands.

 

[Animecel2D]

If I had a billion dollars in my bank account pussy would be the last thing on my mind.

 

[OwlGod]

You even refuted the point you were trying to make, so I'm not sure what you hoped to achieve with that comment.

I didn't. work on your reading comprehension.

The fact women statistically abuse children more and use them as leverage for their own personal game invalidates any of this schlock about 'maternal instinct'.

women spend more time at home as their biological role is house-oriented, they're also more approximate to children. that's why. your argument is not good. btw, specify which kind of abuse, psychological profile of the mothers and each percentage prevalence.
even old-fashioned scholar manners of disciplining would-be considered as abuse nowadays.

Cats and lower animals will also provide their offspring with milk. They are also known for killing their own kittens or abandoning them. It merely proves they operate on evolutionary instinct.

they're known for their beauty and feminity. some kittens may be born prematurely, with skeletal defects or deformities, or are inflicted with impairing ailments. once seen as incapacitated by their parents they're weeded-out to be spared from suffering.

If women carried about children specifically, they wouldn't become single mothers and they wouldn't alienate perfectly fine husbands.

there's no inherent disadvantage to being raised by a single-parent. some reasons for divorcing or nullifying relationships may be legitimate and beneficial for the children. here you're doing an erroneous assumption too, that they'll remain single for the rest of their lives, and that the children will be denied of seeing his father; which is absolutely untrue.
the notion of intact nuclear family superiority is largely hogwash. both routes leads to unilateral parenting where the mother is the main actor, while the father is maintaining the trifecta through manual labor which means he's usually absent. nowadays an intact nuclear family barely even matters too, except for two-sided income, both parents will be too socially, digitally, and professionally busy for any involvement with their own children's lives to occur.

BTW, large numbers of women can't even bothered to breastfeed.

no proof of that. keep pulling numbers out of your ass.

 

[latincell]

Sure, if I'd wake up tomorrow with a billion euros in my bank account, I'd be pleased. At first.

As for my inceldom, the easiest thing to do in such a scenario would be to buy a 10/10 Stacy escort to suck my dick 24/7. But although that would be nice, it'd just be piain old escortmaxxing at the end of the day; not legit ascension. I might even find a foid who would accept my diamond ring and my lavish betabux . But who says she wouldn't divorce me at the first opportunity? Even with the most stringent prenup in place, she'd walk away with a couple of million guaranteed.

Surgerymax? Yes, but only to an extent. Even the most talented surgeons can only do so much if the underlying bone structure is suboptimal. Even the dreaded leg-lengthening procedure would add at most a couple of inches to my diminutive 5'3" frame. I'd still be way below the mark.

The truth is even a billion euros couldn't wipe out my disability and otherwise poor genetics. Nor my autism and its associated lack of refined social skills.

At most, it would buy me a comfortable life on my own. I'd hire a butler and a cook to do all the onerous daily chores for me. Perhaps I'd even set up a private physics lab and try to become the next Nikola Tesla. But I'd still be without a wife. Money is nice, but it can't accomplish everything.

If I had a billion U.S. dollars, I'll try to islammaxx since i'm ethnic-looking enough to pass as Muslim.

 

[Deleted member 34194]

just don't marry the girl bro.
what's the problem with having a ltr with a foid?

 

[IncelWithHate]

I didn't. work on your reading comprehension.

No thanks. You literally described lust and sexual attraction than proceeded to conflate it with love. And somehow considered that a refutation.

women spend more time at home as their biological role is house-oriented, they're also more approximate to children. that's why. your argument is not good. btw, specify which kind of abuse, psychological profile of the mothers and each percentage prevalence.
even old-fashioned scholar manners of disciplining would-be considered as abuse nowadays.

Women spend more time with children due to these reasons yes, but they're also more emotionally unstable, neurotic and prone to hysteria. There is no 'argument', women abuse more children even if we were to account for primary custody. No, I'm not referring to the snowflake generation's redefining of abuse. Also, women pairing up with stepfathers accounts for a not insignificant amount of child abuse percentage.

they're known for their beauty and feminity.

Completely irrelevant.

some kittens may be born prematurely, with skeletal defects or deformities, or are inflicted with impairing ailments. once seen as incapacitated by their parents they're weeded-out to be spared from suffering.

Yes, and this refutes the point how?

there's no inherent disadvantage to being raised by a single-parent.

This is outright idiocy. Even the lowest IQcels know the detrimental effects associated with single motherhood. These studies have been available for well over 50 years now.

some reasons for divorcing or nullifying relationships may be legitimate and beneficial for the children. here you're doing an erroneous assumption too, that they'll remain single for the rest of their lives, and that the children will be denied of seeing his father; which is absolutely untrue.
the notion of intact nuclear family superiority is largely hogwash. both routes leads to unilateral parenting where the mother is the main actor, while the father is maintaining the trifecta through manual labor which means he's usually absent. nowadays an intact nuclear family barely even matters too, except for two-sided income, both parents will be too socially, digitally, and professionally busy for any involvement with their own children's lives to occur.

This babble is largely one continuous strawman you erected, but I will note the bit about the absentee father in an intact family is particularly egregious.