Michinomiya Hirohit
emperor
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
- Posts
- 11,489
- Online
- 119d 11h 20m
Mhm feds want to know how we think buddyos
that made me change my mind. thanksTotal Imbecile said:This is such a simple problem to me. Due to being incel I literally dont care about anything, other peoples lives are meaningless to me, Id just let the train kill 5 people, why risk going to prison
0.00001% chance of me going to prison if I do anything worries me more than 5 randos dying
Then you tie them back onto the train track and wait for the next train.mental_out said:What if they all give you no reward?
Deleted member 19236 said:do nothing and record it
BummerDrummer said:It’s not a moral issue. Objectively Saving 5 people would grant you easy connections/access to their shit.
“I saved your life with the trolley! Surely I demand a reward?”. Even if they gave you a penny you’d still be better off than if you hadn’t done anything.
Hopefully jews.BummerDrummer said:Who are the people on the track
What??? how? Wouldn't killing 1 and saving 4 mean you are MORE trustworthy and nice? As opposed to killing 5? "Endorse sacrifice" as if killing 4 more people isn't an even bigger sacrificeSergeantIncel said:If you chose to pull the lever and sacrifice the 1 guy, this is unironically why you're incel
View attachment 406175
BasedDeleted member 19236 said:do nothing and record it
I'd guess because you're killing someone who "isn't involved", so it means for example that you're more willing to kill a random person and harvest their organs if it means saving 5 people (e.g., China organ black markets).BummerDrummer said:What??? how? Wouldn't killing 1 and saving 4 mean you are MORE trustworthy and nice? As opposed to killing 5? "Endorse sacrifice" as if killing 4 more people isn't an even bigger sacrifice
Yeah but the alternative is killing 5 people. Killing 1>killing 5 in most circumstancesSergeantIncel said:I'd guess because you're killing someone who "isn't involved", so it means for example that you're more willing to kill a random person and harvest their organs if it means saving 5 people (e.g., China organ black markets).
yeah bit weird. What else am I suppose to say? Derail the train and kill none? that's not an optionSergeantIncel said:I'm not sure really.
What if it is 4 incels and one foid or 1 twitter user?ilieknothing said:The 5 is statistically likely to contain 1 or more foids, so I would kill the 5.
The assumption is that you don't know anything about the individuals. However, in that situation I would choose the 4 incels.mental_out said:What if it is 4 incels and one foid or 1 twitter user?