Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Trends and Patterns in Intermarriage(United States, Pew Research)

DarkStar

DarkStar

R1bcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
37,871
Figured I'd share this study I found

Basically, it's analyzed a bunch of patterns in racial intermarriage since 1967

Here's the whole thing, but I'll discern some pieces from it:
In 1967, when miscegenation laws were overturned in the United States, 3% of all newlyweds were married to someone of a different race or ethnicity. Since then, intermarriage rates have steadily climbed. By 1980, the share of intermarried newlyweds had about doubled to 7%. And by 2015 the number had risen to 17%.4
The number doubling from the 60s-80s is of no surprise, yet how much it jumped from then to 2015 is kinda shocking.

The changing racial and ethnic profile of U.S. newlyweds is linked to growth in intermarriage​

Significant growth in the Hispanic and Asian populations in the U.S. since 1980, coupled with the high rates of intermarriage among Hispanic and Asian newlyweds, has been an important factor driving the rise in intermarriage. Since that time, the share of all newlyweds that were Hispanic rose 9 percentage points, from 8% to 17%, and the share that were Asian grew from 2% to 6%. At the same time, the share of white newlyweds declined by 15 points and the share of black newlyweds held steady.
Ofc, here we see that ":soy:: Muh diversity!" isn't exactly such a "fair" thing after all.

For example, whites, who comprise the largest share of the U.S. population, may be more likely to marry someone of the same race simply because most potential partners are white. And members of smaller racial or ethnic groups may be more likely to intermarry because relatively few potential partners share their race or ethnicity.
I think this sort of fits the "exotic" theory to a degree

One of the most dramatic patterns occurs among black newlyweds: Black men are twice as likely as black women to have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity (24% vs. 12%). This gender gap has been a long-standing one – in 1980, 8% of recently married black men and 3% of their female counterparts were married to someone of a different race or ethnicity.
A significant gender gap in intermarriage is apparent among Asian newlyweds as well, though the gap runs in the opposite direction: Just over one-third (36%) of Asian newlywed women have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, while 21% of Asian newlywed men do. A substantial gender gap in intermarriage was also present in 1980, when 39% of newly married Asian women and 26% of their male counterparts were married to someone of a different race or ethnicity.
Alongside "just dont be asian" I think a sort of fem"cel" blackpill might be "just dont be black woman" :feelshaha:

A growing educational gap in intermarriage​


In 2015 the likelihood of marrying someone of a different race or ethnicity was somewhat higher among newlyweds with at least some college experience than among those with a high school diploma or less. While 14% of the less-educated group was married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, this share rose to 18% among those with some college experience and 19% among those with at least a bachelor’s degree. This marks a change from 1980, when there were virtually no educational differences in the likelihood of intermarriage among newlyweds.7
This was pretty interesting, since it does make sense: Those who go to college tend to skew more left by default, especially for more upper-levels as shown here.



Asians with some college are the most likely to intermarry​

While intermarriage is associated with higher education levels for Hispanics and blacks, this is not the case among Asian newlyweds. Those with some college are by far the most likely to have married someone of a different race or ethnicity – 39% in 2015 had done so, compared with about one-fourth (26%) of those with only a high school diploma or less and 29% of those with a bachelor’s degree.
This also surprised me quite a bit, since I assumed Rices who were more higher educated would do better. :waitwhat:

In metro areas, almost one-in-five newlyweds are intermarried​

Intermarriage is more common among newlyweds in the nation’s metropolitan areas, which are located in and around large urban centers, than it is in non-metro areas9, which are typically more rural. About 18% of those living in a metro area are married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, compared with 11% of those living outside of a metro area. In 1980, 8% of newlyweds in metro areas were intermarried, compared with 5% of those in non-metro areas.
Would make sense.

This, however, is the ultimate takeaway and most useful fact here imo:

PST 20170515intermarriage 01 00


A nice, clear breakdown per demographics. :feelscomfy:

Essentially, this is the "American Racepill" as I'd term it- also will be interesting to see certain users reactions to this. :feelshehe:

Hopefully this also ends many hardcore absolutist ":soy:: MUH JBW!" shills
 
Last edited:
@LeFrenchCel @WorthlessSlavicShit @Castaway @Lv99_BixNood @light @Chudpreet @based_meme @BlackCel_from_ZA @PolskiKartofel @fatass30000 @Regenerator @ElTruecel
 
Brutal noodlepill
 
JBW only for noodlewhores kek. Nothing new.
 
@LeFrenchCel @WorthlessSlavicShit @Castaway @Lv99_BixNood @light @Chudpreet @based_meme @BlackCel_from_ZA @PolskiKartofel @fatass30000 @Regenerator @ElTruecel
I read, but I need to do that again soon, because my cognitive abilities are too low rn after 2h of sleep and 1.5h before small exam (but still exam)

And
JBW only for noodlewhores kek. Nothing new.
Just fly 5k km to find poor noodle for wife theory
 
Data is too outdated

1732864676647

1732864687653


Black Americans were more likely to view porn than White Americans. Black men were more likely to view porn than any other gender/racial combinations. White women's porn use rates that increased over time were similar to Black men's porn use rates and their increases over time. Source: https://www.addictionhelp.com/porn/statistics/#:~:text=Black Americans were more likely,and their increases over time
If anything it was shitskin who watch it more than any other group combined. Wojak coomer is not accruate at all if we use the statistics.
Post covid-Pandemic changed everything
1732864698072


It's not JBW but

Just DONT be Ethnic is law
 
Last edited:
racemixing is the worst thing that ever happened in history
 
I hate interracial couples.
 
Figured I'd share this study I found

Basically, it's analyzed a bunch of patterns in racial intermarriage since 1967

Here's the whole thing, but I'll discern some pieces from it:

The number doubling from the 60s-80s is of no surprise, yet how much it jumped from then to 2015 is kinda shocking.


Ofc, here we see that ":soy:: Muh diversity!" isn't exactly such a "fair" thing after all.


I think this sort of fits the "exotic" theory to a degree



Alongside "just dont be asian" I think a sort of fem"cel" blackpill might be "just dont be black woman" :feelshaha:


This was pretty interesting, since it does make sense: Those who go to college tend to skew more left by default, especially for more upper-levels as shown here.


This also surprised me quite a bit, since I assumed Rices who were more higher educated would do better. :waitwhat:


Would make sense.

This, however, is the ultimate takeaway and most useful fact here imo:

View attachment 1334749

A nice, clear breakdown per demographics. :feelscomfy:

Essentially, this is the "American Racepill" as I'd term it- also will be interesting to see certain users reactions to this. :feelshehe:

Hopefully this also ends many hardcore absolutist ":soy:: MUH JBW!" shills
I enjoyed the read, JBW rains supremem once again
 
Figured I'd share this study I found

Basically, it's analyzed a bunch of patterns in racial intermarriage since 1967

Here's the whole thing, but I'll discern some pieces from it:

The number doubling from the 60s-80s is of no surprise, yet how much it jumped from then to 2015 is kinda shocking.


Ofc, here we see that ":soy:: Muh diversity!" isn't exactly such a "fair" thing after all.


I think this sort of fits the "exotic" theory to a degree



Alongside "just dont be asian" I think a sort of fem"cel" blackpill might be "just dont be black woman" :feelshaha:


This was pretty interesting, since it does make sense: Those who go to college tend to skew more left by default, especially for more upper-levels as shown here.


This also surprised me quite a bit, since I assumed Rices who were more higher educated would do better. :waitwhat:


Would make sense.

This, however, is the ultimate takeaway and most useful fact here imo:

View attachment 1334749

A nice, clear breakdown per demographics. :feelscomfy:

Essentially, this is the "American Racepill" as I'd term it- also will be interesting to see certain users reactions to this. :feelshehe:

Hopefully this also ends many hardcore absolutist ":soy:: MUH JBW!" shills
White genocide/great replacement/kalergi plan is real, and race mixing is a bit part of it
 
A bit old but still a good overview of the issue.
 
Good post. I did expect the Black husband/White wife percentages to be a bit higher, tbhngl.
it’s because white woman only hook up with black guys, they don’t marry them because they see them as low status. A lot of white woman hook up with black guys to be rebellious, because of the stereotypes or fetishes.
 
it’s because white woman only hook up with black guys, they don’t marry them because they see them as low status. A lot of white woman hook up with black guys to be rebellious, because of the stereotypes or fetishes.
Makes sense, tbh. :blackpill::bigbrain:
 

Similar threads

I
Replies
24
Views
411
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
JollyGentleman
Replies
5
Views
247
JollyGentleman
JollyGentleman
Gott _mit _uns94
Replies
18
Views
403
PolskiKartofel
PolskiKartofel
Nordicel94
Replies
11
Views
563
CuntHater
CuntHater

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top