Why are you voting for orange man? State why below
Project 2025
What's project 2025? I should watch a documentary about it honestly. I keep hearing cucksersvatives say project 2025.
Conservative plan that if successful plans to eliminate faggotry from the white house, I have the document and look what nigger gpt said:
The document is talking about how the next conservative administration plans to handle "The Transgender Question". Here's what they're aiming to do:
1. **Keep "Sex" Based on Biology**: They want to make sure that laws about sex discrimination are based on someone's biological sex at birth, not their gender identity. So, if a law says you can't discriminate based on sex, they mean only your physical sex, not how you identify.
2. **Roll Back Protections for Transgender Individuals**: The current rules that protect people from being discriminated against because they're transgender would be removed. This means they want to cancel laws that stop discrimination based on someone's gender identity.
3. **School Policies**: They want schools to only recognize a student's biological sex, not their gender identity. So, if a student wants to change their name or pronouns, schools would need to get parental permission. No supporting students in transitioning without involving the parents.
4. **Bathrooms, Sports, and Locker Rooms**: They want to limit transgender individuals' access to bathrooms or locker rooms that match their gender identity. They plan to make sure that using these spaces is based on biological sex instead.
The general idea is to reverse most of the policies put in place to support transgender individuals and instead focus on defining people by their biological sex, especially when it comes to laws, schools, and other public spaces. They want to give parents more control over what happens if a child wants to transition, and to remove legal protections for people identifying as transgender beyond hiring and firing for jobs.
Also total abortion erasure:
The document talks about how they want to handle policies related to women and gender. Here's what they plan to do:
1. **Change Focus Away from Broad Gender Equality**: They want to stop talking about "gender equality" in a broad sense. Instead, they want to focus specifically on supporting women in traditional roles—like as mothers and family caretakers—rather than supporting all genders or promoting gender identity topics.
2. **Rename Offices to Focus on Families**: For example, they want to change the name of an office at USAID (a government agency) that currently works on "Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment" to an office for "Women, Children, and Families." This means they want to put more effort into helping families and kids rather than pushing for broader gender equality or including transgender and gender identity issues.
3. **Get Rid of Diversity and Gender Programs**: They also want to remove Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs in federal agencies. They see these programs as too focused on promoting different gender identities and other ideas that they think don't fit with traditional family roles. Instead, they want to focus on policies that they believe will help traditional families and women.
4. **Return to Traditional Gender Roles**: Overall, they want to promote a more traditional view of gender—basically encouraging women to stay in traditional roles as mothers and family caretakers. They think the current focus on things like gender identity (e.g., people identifying as non-binary or transgender) is harmful and wants to pull back on those initiatives.
To put it simply, they want to stop focusing on broad gender equality and inclusiveness. Instead, they want to focus on helping women in their roles as mothers and caregivers, and to return to traditional views of what men and women should do. They’re rolling back policies that support different gender identities or promote diversity, and focusing instead on family-centric ideas.
The document talks about how they want to handle policies related to women and gender. Here's what they plan to do:
1. **Change Focus Away from Broad Gender Equality**: They want to stop talking about "gender equality" in a broad sense. Instead, they want to focus specifically on supporting women in traditional roles—like as mothers and family caretakers—rather than supporting all genders or promoting gender identity topics.
2. **Rename Offices to Focus on Families**: For example, they want to change the name of an office at USAID (a government agency) that currently works on "Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment" to an office for "Women, Children, and Families." This means they want to put more effort into helping families and kids rather than pushing for broader gender equality or including transgender and gender identity issues.
3. **Get Rid of Diversity and Gender Programs**: They also want to remove Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs in federal agencies. They see these programs as too focused on promoting different gender identities and other ideas that they think don't fit with traditional family roles. Instead, they want to focus on policies that they believe will help traditional families and women.
4. **Return to Traditional Gender Roles**: Overall, they want to promote a more traditional view of gender—basically encouraging women to stay in traditional roles as mothers and family caretakers. They think the current focus on things like gender identity (e.g., people identifying as non-binary or transgender) is harmful and wants to pull back on those initiatives.
To put it simply, they want to stop focusing on broad gender equality and inclusiveness. Instead, they want to focus on helping women in their roles as mothers and caregivers, and to return to traditional views of what men and women should do. They’re rolling back policies that support different gender identities or promote diversity, and focusing instead on family-centric ideas.
The document's approach to the "abortion question" centers around strong anti-abortion policies and rolling back existing rights and services. Here’s what it says:
1. **Ban Chemical Abortions**: They want the FDA to reverse its approval of chemical abortion drugs like mifepristone, arguing that their approval process was flawed and that the drugs pose risks to women's health. They also want to stop the distribution of abortion pills through the mail and eliminate telemedicine abortions【31:1†source】.
2. **Restore Safety Protocols**: The FDA should reinstate older safety protocols for these drugs, including in-person visits with healthcare providers and stricter limits on when the pills can be used during pregnancy. They argue this will make abortions safer for women and protect unborn children【31:1†source】.
3. **Defund Abortion Providers**: They want to defund organizations that provide abortions, such as Planned Parenthood, and block these groups from participating in state-run programs like Medicaid. They are also pushing for Congress to pass the "Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act," which would prevent federal funds from supporting abortion services【31:8†source】.
4. **International Policy**: They also propose reversing Biden-era policies that provide international funding for abortion-related services. They want U.S. foreign aid to only go to organizations that do not support or provide abortions, reinstating the "Mexico City Policy" and expanding it to all forms of foreign assistance【31:2†source】.
5. **Increase Monitoring and Reporting**: They plan to enforce stricter data collection and monitoring on abortions. This includes requiring hospitals and clinics to report more details about abortions, complications, and outcomes, as well as improving transparency about abortion drug sponsors and manufacturers【31:1†source】.
In short, they want to make abortions harder to access, restrict funding for organizations that provide abortions, roll back mail-order and telemedicine options, and make regulatory changes to stop the use of federal funds for abortion both at home and abroad. They are focused on making it harder for abortions to be performed and ensuring that more legal and financial barriers are in place to limit access.
1. **Ban Chemical Abortions**: They want the FDA to reverse its approval of chemical abortion drugs like mifepristone, arguing that their approval process was flawed and that the drugs pose risks to women's health. They also want to stop the distribution of abortion pills through the mail and eliminate telemedicine abortions【31:1†source】.
2. **Restore Safety Protocols**: The FDA should reinstate older safety protocols for these drugs, including in-person visits with healthcare providers and stricter limits on when the pills can be used during pregnancy. They argue this will make abortions safer for women and protect unborn children【31:1†source】.
3. **Defund Abortion Providers**: They want to defund organizations that provide abortions, such as Planned Parenthood, and block these groups from participating in state-run programs like Medicaid. They are also pushing for Congress to pass the "Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act," which would prevent federal funds from supporting abortion services【31:8†source】.
4. **International Policy**: They also propose reversing Biden-era policies that provide international funding for abortion-related services. They want U.S. foreign aid to only go to organizations that do not support or provide abortions, reinstating the "Mexico City Policy" and expanding it to all forms of foreign assistance【31:2†source】.
5. **Increase Monitoring and Reporting**: They plan to enforce stricter data collection and monitoring on abortions. This includes requiring hospitals and clinics to report more details about abortions, complications, and outcomes, as well as improving transparency about abortion drug sponsors and manufacturers【31:1†source】.
In short, they want to make abortions harder to access, restrict funding for organizations that provide abortions, roll back mail-order and telemedicine options, and make regulatory changes to stop the use of federal funds for abortion both at home and abroad. They are focused on making it harder for abortions to be performed and ensuring that more legal and financial barriers are in place to limit access.
Imagine if this happened
the foid suffering after realizing they can't fuck chad without consequences
Based. But Only if the middle East wouldn't be affected by a trump presidency. Otherwise, I would support him
If only
Not american, therefore I won't be voting for Don Zion or the Coconut lady. However if I were an amerimutt I'd vote for Trump because he'd make the progressives in Europe sheesh.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
