Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill To all the cringe coping desperado LARPing Che Guevaras

  • Thread starter Deleted member 10124
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 10124

Self-banned
-
Joined
Jul 8, 2018
Posts
13,418
Put your money where your mouth is:

1. You say violence is the only answer & that threats work. I say assertiveness & forcefullness & warnings/ultimatums based on cause & effect contingencies work as it forces so & so to sit up & take notice. Not your LARPing faghotry Elliott Rodgers who couldn't do shit & did fuck all.
2. For those advocating violence & violent revolution. Put your money where your mouth is. Coward. You lead first. You're not even brave enough to interact with others on social media where the battles & skirmishes take place daily. You're all a flatter full of hot air at the end of the day.
3. Denying people their rights. Slavery/Concubinage? Have the guts to come out & say it. Too useless to implement it or even attempt it so you only shit post & fame whore in the hopes some mainstream media outlet picks up your nonsense. If you can't advocate it man to man with anyone either face to face or over social media than grow some balls, take your hand out of holding your cock & actually get to work. That simple. If you can't even interact with others how the fuck do you think you're going to reinstate your mythical nostalgic "patriarchy".
4. To all the pseudo intellectualism & other such nonsense from the self appointed intelligentsia. You're no better than Fontaine just reverse the message or theme. Only good thing is you respond.
5. Put your suggestions to people outside this forum to see if you can defend it. If you can't than you're useless & do sweet fuck all. That simple. Getting validation from your circle jerking buddies isn't validation. It's gay ass circle jerking.
6. Want to respond feel free to.

Waiting Mofos.
 
Blank 063c1df39aae3940245cb46c29df9a13
 
I don't condone violence. I advocate enlightened, non discriminatory policy of banning extramarital sex for both sexes. If foids have to choose between being alone or settling for their looksmatch (because they can't all marry Chad), it should be enough to save most incels from inceldom and depress the overinflated value of pussy.
 
Elliot Rodger did nothing wrong.
 
I don't condone violence. I advocate enlightened, non discriminatory policy of banning extramarital sex for both sexes. If foids have to choose between being alone or settling for their looksmatch (because they can't all marry Chad), it should be enough to save most incels from inceldom and depress the overinflated value of pussy.

Social & societal conservatism. Okay that's a view point we can discuss. Thank God we can have some sane discussion.
Except kill his ricecel roommates. He killed more incels than foids.

Apparently they were cucks. Only on hearsay evidence all because dumb arses here beautified a narcissistic dim wit.
https://incels.is/threads/the-white-pill-practical-guide-part-2-unofficial.95881/
Ladies & Gentleman. I present to you failed NatSocCel Elliott Rodger.

https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/Elliot_Rodger

In his own words if you read his manifesto.

His murder of ricecels is a racially based targeted hate crime terrorist attack.

Read & Weep.
I believe they are his direct quotes unedited.
 
Last edited:
JFL this thread was obviously made for me so I will respond, but one thing I notice upon reading is that you misunderstand how this thing works, being "public" doesn't mean "doing your part", you can be public and debate and accomplish nothing, most things that are world changing take place behind the scenes not in front of peoples faces. Also this is a matter of human rights not public opinion, the changes that we want to be made to society require women's rights to be violated, that's why it doesn't matter how publicly we advocate for those changes and how nicely we ask for them

1. You say violence is the only answer & that threats work. I say assertiveness & forcefullness & warnings/ultimatums based on cause & effect contingencies work as it forces so & so to sit up & take notice. Not your LARPing faghotry Elliott Rodgers who couldn't do shit & did fuck all.

People taking notice doesn't matter if your demands are impossible for them to meet, there's a point I have to keep reiterating and its sad, like the user EyesAreSoCold said in my thread:

Isn't this obvious already wtf, this is like the first law of the blackpill. Foids only want to fuck the top tier men, they'd rather share a chad than have a monogamous marriage with a non-chad.

In order for society to meet even one of our most basic demands, which is to have women date their looksmatches, would require FORCING women to do so, in other words violating their rights, hence the title of my thread (https://incels.is/threads/hard-to-s...ive-male-population.97642/page-2#post-1906131).

"WOMEN'S RIGHTS HAVE TO BE VIOLATED FOR A SOCIETY TO HAVE A COLLECTIVELY SATISFIED AND PRODUCTIVE MALE POPULATION"

So lets be honest here, someone seeing your demands, is not the same as them being willing to bring them to fruition, and society never will, because our demands at their core, require women to have no rights, or to have their rights restricted, so trying to come off as "non-violent and reasonable" makes no difference because they can't meet our demands anyways.

2. For those advocating violence & violent revolution. Put your money where your mouth is. Coward. You lead first. You're not even brave enough to interact with others on social media where the battles & skirmishes take place daily. You're all a flatter full of hot air at the end of the day.

Again allow me to reiterate, interacting publicly makes no difference, you are just coping by telling yourself that if you make posts on twitter it will "make a difference", I mean I looked at some of your posts and a lot of them have 2 DAMN LIKES, what the fuck kind of difference are you making then?

That's whats coping, thinking that sharing an unpopular opinion on normie media platforms is going to make a difference in the long run, you are confused thinking you are going to play normies at their game and beat them at it, social media is a game of popularity, the black pill is the most unpopular opinion there is, nobody is going to care what you have to say really, they'll ignore you, block you, or have your account deleted, what you are asking is that I play a losing game, if I ever created a twitter account and people realized it was me (blkpillpres the extremist incel) the account would just get deleted immediately, also twitter is a bit tricky with their policies, my IP address would likely be visible, and twitter has shown itself to be a very untrustworthy media platform when it comes to freedom of speech, so the risk is not worth the reward, I can't trust that my location data will remain anonymous as it would using youtube or this site, I'd bet that some leftist working for twitter would find a way to leak my info and fuck my life up, why take that chance for the privilege to be ignored.

Its funny that you don't see the irony in what you're saying even after having your account deleted and not even remotely making an impact

3. Denying people their rights. Slavery/Concubinage? Have the guts to come out & say it. Too useless to implement it or even attempt it so you only shit post & fame whore in the hopes some mainstream media outlet picks up your nonsense. If you can't advocate it man to man with anyone either face to face or over social media than grow some balls, take your hand out of holding your cock & actually get to work. That simple. If you can't even interact with others how the fuck do you think you're going to reinstate your mythical nostalgic "patriarchy".

Your misunderstanding of how this shit works is becoming more and more apparent, its like you are completely confused, you are arguing that my methods are extreme while at the same time asking me why I'm not trying to advocate in an un-extreme manner JFL. Does "talking face to face" seem extremist to you?

You seem to think the things I'm advocating for can be "reasoned into existence", like if I just talk about it publicly and "man up" people will listen, that's not how this work, those are methods fit for your weak limp wristed perspective and how did that work out of you, oh yeah, nothing changed and your account got deleted, you were trying to beat normies at their "be likable" game and you didn't seem to get they could just simply delete your account, trying to come out publicly is a waste of time, JFL at your logic, are you even thinking what you're saying through.

Also JFL at the "man up" rhetoric, it almost sounds like you are trying to use reverse psychology so I can get myself doxxed, someone playing pattycake like you gets your accuont deleted, I try what you did using my words and people start looking to dox me, combing through all my public posts, data, etc to find me, then I'm fucked, have some damn common sense, its risky and will make no difference at the end of the day

4. To all the pseudo intellectualism & other such nonsense from the self appointed intelligentsia. You're no better than Fontaine just reverse the message or theme. Only good thing is you respond.

Don't know enough about Fontaine to get the comparison

5. Put your suggestions to people outside this forum to see if you can defend it. If you can't than you're useless & do sweet fuck all. That simple. Getting validation from your circle jerking buddies isn't validation. It's gay ass circle jerking.

I'm in no position right now to do anything like that, but at some point I do plan on creating my own forum, at some point I will have a public presence, but that's only after I establish an untouchable passive income stream, normies play dirty, if you try to advocate for extreme things like I believe in publicly then they'll simply threaten your livelihood, and I'm not risking my peace of mind for nothing, when I can afford to be public, i'll come out publicly.

I've done my time & I do my time. I don't have to brag for shit.

JFL at you thinking that making a few public posts on twitter that barely anyone sees or cares for, is you "doing your part", you have a really low bar set in your mind for "doing my time", I won't consider myself to have done anything unless normies are in public advocating for my death and news outlets are having segments about me discussing how dangerous my words and beliefs are.

Your problem is that you are too easily satisfied, you have a low bar set for "making a difference", like are you serious right now JFL, your twitter account wasn't even really known, you had like 77 followers, less users than this site, so ironically you would have a larger "audience" by just making posts here.

Your problem is you think this "war" is a popularity contest that can be won via public notoriety, ironically my youtube channel has more subs than you had twitter followers and it keeps increasing even though I haven't made a video in a year. But that is irrelevant, being known makes no difference, being public makes no difference.

I would only bother talking about my ideals publicly if I was invited to do a live stream with a "known person", for example if Tommy Sotomayor or Steven Crowder invited me to talk about my ideals on one of their streams, I'd be hard pressed to refuse, and I plan on making such things happen, but not yet because again, I am still subject to the forces of employment, as long as you have to depend on employment, you can't truly be honest about such extreme opinions, when I have an independent source of income that I can live off of and not worry about being fired and having to pay bills, then I'll come forward and have a true public presence.
 
Last edited:
Violence is bad :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
JFL this thread was obviously made for me so I will respond, but one thing I notice upon reading is that you misunderstand how this thing works, being "public" doesn't mean "doing your part", you can be public and debate and accomplish nothing, most things that are world changing take place behind the scenes not in front of peoples faces. Also this is a matter of human rights not public opinion, the changes that we want to be made to society require women's rights to be violated, that's why it doesn't matter how publicly we advocate for those changes and how nicely we ask for them

Actually I do understand how being public & putting your arguments out in the public sphere is doing your part. Other than your "E" Whoring which you admit to via your You Tube & other Social Media outlets you're not really doing anything effective regarding presenting ideas that actually stand up to any scrutiny whatsoever. Agreed things take place behind the scenes. Doing them publicly may or may not reflect that. If it's a matter of human rights than that's won over via Public Opinion. Do you honestly think that any activist didn't persuade public opinion first before they got their human rights? Women's rights to be violated? How? If they're violated then they'll fight back as would anyone do. You haven't presented anything other than mere verbiosity & excessively long red herring answers. It's tiresome & tedious. Actually how we advocate for those changes does matter a great deal.

People taking notice doesn't matter if your demands are impossible for them to meet, there's a point I have to keep reiterating and its sad, like the user EyesAreSoCold said in my thread:

Are our needs impossible to meet? Violation of someone else's rights via a false dichotomy as opposed to bolstering our rights & freedoms. Is that so impossible? Can you please tell me how that is impossible?

In order for society to meet even one of our most basic demands, which is to have women date their looksmatches, would require FORCING women to do so, in other words violating their rights, hence the title of my thread (https://incels.is/threads/hard-to-s...ive-male-population.97642/page-2#post-1906131).

"WOMEN'S RIGHTS HAVE TO BE VIOLATED FOR A SOCIETY TO HAVE A COLLECTIVELY SATISFIED AND PRODUCTIVE MALE POPULATION"

So lets be honest here, someone seeing your demands, is not the same as them being willing to bring them to fruition, and society never will, because our demands at their core, require women to have no rights, or to have their rights restricted, so trying to come off as "non-violent and reasonable" makes no difference because they can't meet our demands anyways.

Forcing women to date their looksmatch means didley squat. Hypergamy has always been around. Giving us Incels greater scope & freedom to effectively come & go by or leave at will that is our freedom in my books.

Again how do they have to be violated? Social Conservatism? Sharia Law? Magdalene Laundries? Concubinage/Slavery? It's all very vague & un specific as if you don't know how you're going to implement it & are just making things up as you go along. Are you?

Your false dichotomy is needless & pointless. What do you plan to do & how do you plan to do it when Women can equally fight back? Weird.


Again allow me to reiterate, interacting publicly makes no difference, you are just coping by telling yourself that if you make posts on twitter it will "make a difference", I mean I looked at some of your posts and a lot of them have 2 DAMN LIKES, what the fuck kind of difference are you making then?

That's whats coping, thinking that sharing an unpopular opinion on normie media platforms is going to make a difference in the long run, you are confused thinking you are going to play normies at their game and beat them at it, social media is a game of popularity, the black pill is the most unpopular opinion there is, nobody is going to care what you have to say really, they'll ignore you, block you, or have your account deleted, what you are asking is that I play a losing game, if I ever created a twitter account and people realized it was me (blkpillpres the extremist incel) the account would just get deleted immediately, also twitter is a bit tricky with their policies, my IP address would likely be visible, and twitter has shown itself to be a very untrustworthy media platform when it comes to freedom of speech, so the risk is not worth the reward, I can't trust that my location data will remain anonymous as it would using youtube or this site, I'd bet that some leftist working for twitter would find a way to leak my info and fuck my life up, why take that chance for the privilege to be ignored.

Its funny that you don't see the irony in what you're saying even after having your account deleted and not even remotely making an impact

The :blackpill: is unpopular because it forces people to be introspective & own up to their own prejudices & preferences which in this day & age of virtue signalling nobody wants to do. I've been on Twitter & I've had none of what you say happen to me. If you're concerned about being doxed then use a VPN, disposable email address & dongle. You're making excuses for not wanting to do anything.

Your misunderstanding of how this shit works is becoming more and more apparent, its like you are completely confused, you are arguing that my methods are extreme while at the same time asking me why I'm not trying to advocate in an un-extreme manner JFL. Does "talking face to face" seem extremist to you?

You seem to think the things I'm advocating for can be "reasoned into existence", like if I just talk about it publicly and "man up" people will listen, that's not how this work, those are methods fit for your weak limp wristed perspective and how did that work out of you, oh yeah, nothing changed and your account got deleted, you were trying to beat normies at their "be likable" game and you didn't seem to get they could just simply delete your account, trying to come out publicly is a waste of time, JFL at your logic, are you even thinking what you're saying through.

Also JFL at the "man up" rhetoric, it almost sounds like you are trying to use reverse psychology so I can get myself doxxed, someone playing pattycake like you gets your accuont deleted, I try what you did using my words and people start looking to dox me, combing through all my public posts, data, etc to find me, then I'm fucked, have some damn common sense, its risky and will make no difference at the end of the day

Your methods aren't extreme. They're E Fame Whoring. Son. Learn. The. Difference. You can't carry them out because you know that you'd get trounced in trying to do so let alone speak so. You have nothing to be advocating because you have no skeleton specifics to go on other than playing to the crowd here to validate you. I don't have to be likeable to win. I got banned for 12 hours if you didn't read. Where have I been advocating to be "likeable"? Why would I want you Doxed. You're useless & you're a fraud which angers me even more.


Don't know enough about Fontaine to get the comparison

You do.

I'm in no position right now to do anything like that, but at some point I do plan on creating my own forum, at some point I will have a public presence, but that's only after I establish an untouchable passive income stream, normies play dirty, if you try to advocate for extreme things like I believe in publicly then they'll simply threaten your livelihood, and I'm not risking my peace of mind for nothing, when I can afford to be public, i'll come out publicly.

So you're milking the system then. Jumping on the bandwagon. How predictable.

JFL at you thinking that making a few public posts on twitter that barely anyone sees or cares for, is you "doing your part", you have a really low bar set in your mind for "doing my time", I won't consider myself to have done anything unless normies are in public advocating for my death and news outlets are having segments about me discussing how dangerous my words and beliefs are.

Your problem is that you are too easily satisfied, you have a low bar set for "making a differnece", like are you serious right now JFL, your twitter account wasn't even really known, you had like 77 followers, less users than this site, so ironically you would have a larger "audience" by just making posts here.

Your problem is you think this "war" is a popularity contest that can be won via public notoriety, ironically my youtube channel has more subs than you had twitter followers and it keeps increasing even though I haven't made a video in a year. But that is irrelevant, being known makes no difference, being public makes no difference.

I would only bother talking about my ideals publicly if I was invited to do a live stream with a "known person", for example if Tommy Sotomayor or Steven Crowder invited me to talk about my ideals on one of their streams, I'd be hard pressed to refuse, and I plan on making such things happen, but not yet because again, I am still subject to the forces of employment, as long as you have to depend on employment, you can't truly be honest about such extreme opinions, when I have an independent source of income that I can live off of and not worry about being fired and having to pay bills, then I'll come forward and have a true public presence.

You don't know what you want other than merely sprouting conjecture & cliches of what you think we all need. Your verbiosity is wasted as it's merely elaborate red herrings.
I also mentioned other ways to do your part in the White Pill Practical Guide Part 2. If you care to read. I won't be saying all the stuff that I've done on there but none of them involves milking others for money for Podium Fame Whoring Status.
Violence is bad :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:

How's your Girl Anger or is it Anguish?
No one still hasn't looked at Elliot Rodgers own quotes in his own words then? Figures.
 
Last edited:
Giving us Incels greater scope & freedom to effectively come & go by or leave at will that is our freedom in my books.

I'm not going to go into a long back and forth because I've argued all these points so much already, but you said something here that I think gets to the root of our argument.

What exactly do you mean by this, its very vague, what do you mean by "come & go"?, is it literal or figurative?, what are you even saying here.
 
I'm not going to go into a long back and forth because I've argued all these points so much already, but you said something here that I think gets to the root of our argument.

What exactly do you mean by this, its very vague, what do you mean by "come & go"?, is it literal or figurative?, what are you even saying here.

What I said in those Tweets. It's literal. I would only ever argue for literal.

It's our Freedom that is at stake here.


Simple. We show them. That without ALL OF us they're whole world collapses as they know it. It's happening & it's here.

You simply don't get out enough to be able to see that.
Cat got your tongue @BlkPillPres or you gonna throw me another long winded Red Herring answer?
I'm off to have a shower now. Laters.
 
Last edited:
What I said in those Tweets. It's literal. I would only ever argue for literal.

It's our Freedom that is at stake here.


Simple. We show them. That without ALL OF us they're whole world collapses as they know it. It's happening & it's here.

You simply don't get out enough to be able to see that.
Cat got your tongue @BlkPillPres or you gonna throw me another long winded Red Herring answer?


"Giving us Incels greater scope & freedom to effectively come & go by or leave at will that is our freedom in my books."

No what do you mean by exactly by those words SMH, are you dense, you haven't explained what I asked yet, its like you don't even know what you yourself are saying, just spouting vague platitudes.

Give me an example, what the hell do you mean by "Giving us Incels greater scope & freedom"

1. How is the "scope" of our "freedom" currently limited, and what would be and example of making it "greater"?

2. What the hell do you mean by "come & go" and "leave at will"

This is why I asked is it "literal" or "figurative", because it sounds like you are talking about places, as though our movement is restricted and we are banned from physical places, so what do you mean?
 
"Giving us Incels greater scope & freedom to effectively come & go by or leave at will that is our freedom in my books."

No what do you mean by exactly by those words SMH, are you dense, you haven't explained what I asked yet, its like you don't even know what you yourself are saying, just spouting vague platitudes.

Give me an example, what the hell do you mean by "Giving us Incels greater scope & freedom"

1. How is the "scope" of our "freedom" currently limited, and what would be and example of making it "greater"?

2. What the hell do you mean by "come & go" and "leave at will"

This is why I asked is it "literal" or "figurative", because it sounds like you are talking about places, as though our movement is restricted and we are banned from physical places, so what do you mean?

I explained what you asked by referring you to a source. If you're too dense & dosy to grasp that. That's your fault not mine. Sprouting vague platitudes as opposed to your vaguer shit posting? Where's the platitudes when you put that into play?

Greater Scope & Freedom to do as Normal Individuals are able to do.

If you can't see our scope & freedom being restricted based on our physical features outside of our control then are you actually even :blackpill:'ed?

Come & go & leave at will. Same as above. Literal as it's not figurative. Literal as in our actions & motions. Movement restricted in the sense that we can't do as Normal people do regarding bars, clubs, out door stuff anything like that as well as in interaction with the opposite sex.

Thanks for answering.
 
I explained what you asked by referring you to a source. If you're too dense & dosy to grasp that. That's your fault not mine. Sprouting vague platitudes as opposed to your vaguer shit posting? Where's the platitudes when you put that into play?

Greater Scope & Freedom to do as Normal Individuals are able to do.

If you can't see our scope & freedom being restricted based on our physical features outside of our control then are you actually even :blackpill:'ed?

Come & go & leave at will. Same as above. Literal as it's not figurative. Literal as in our actions & motions. Movement restricted in the sense that we can't do as Normal people do regarding bars, clubs, out door stuff anything like that as well as in interaction with the opposite sex.

Thanks for answering.

Thanks for being for specific, because now you've ironically admitted that you are advocating for women's rights to be restricted or removed, because so long as women have a choice the physical features outside of our control are going to restrict our ability to have relationships and sex with women.

Also nothing is stopping us from going to bars, clubs or doing out door stuff, any normie would easily dismantle this BS statement, nothing is stopping us from doing this, what you mean (again you like to be vague instead of fucking specific) by going to bars, clubs, out door stuff is being "successful" at the intended purpose of those acts, interacting with people, especially women, and creating relationships. So no, there is nothing stopping us, nor has there ever been, there's just no point in doing those things because since women can reject their looks match and hypergamy is on the rise we'd just be wasting our time.

Now your entire argument looks disingenuous, because it looks like you were being vague on purpose so we couldn't get to the brass and tacs of this thing.

What you meant by the scope of our freedom is that our looks restrict our opportunities, the only way to change that to any extent IS TO FORCE OTHERS NOT TO TREAT US A CERTAIN WAY

What you meant by "come and go" and "leave at will" was literal and referred to our ability to go to physical places, that was your most BS retard argument because nobody is stopping us nor has anyone stopped us, there are no 6/10 and up signs in front of restaurants, bars and clubs.

Who the hell goes out of their way to state something that is so simple in such a vague manner as "scope of our freedom" or "come and go", without stating explicit examples, someone who is arguing dishonestly that's who. There was no reason to state it like that, it would have been much easier to just simply state what you mean, so now it looks like you were doing it on purpose.
 
Thanks for being for specific, because now you've ironically admitted that you are advocating for women's rights to be restricted or removed, because so long as women have a choice the physical features outside of our control are going to restrict our ability to have relationships and sex with women.

Where have I advocated for their rights to be restricted or removed? I've argued that we should be afforded legal recognition & respect. That's not advocating for anyone's rights to be restricted or removed. I haven't forced them to do anything other than show us basic human rights what I stated in those tweets. That's all. You're fusing two different parts together & then claiming I've agreed with you on your vague first premise.

Also nothing is stopping us from going to bars, clubs or doing out door stuff, any normie would easily dismantle this BS statement, nothing is stopping us from doing this, what you mean (again you like to be vague instead of fucking specific) by going to bars, clubs, out door stuff is being "successful" at the intended purpose of those acts, interacting with people, especially women, and creating relationships. So no, there is nothing stopping us, nor has there ever been, there's just no point in doing those things because since women can reject their looks match and hypergamy is on the rise we'd just be wasting our time.

It's not a BS statement. Actually we can't go into bars, clubs or anything like that because we'd be stared out & looked upon as Lepers. You're not :blackpill:ed enough to see that has taken place & does take place. That's disingenious of you to negate others experiences & reality.

Now your entire argument looks disingenuous, because it looks like you were being vague on purpose so we couldn't get to the brass and tacs of this thing.

What you meant by the scope of our freedom is that our looks restrict our opportunities, the only way to change that to any extent IS TO FORCE OTHERS NOT TO TREAT US A CERTAIN WAY

What you meant by "come and go" and "leave at will" was literal and referred to our ability to go to physical places, that was your most BS retard argument because nobody is stopping us nor has anyone stopped us, there are no 6/10 and up signs in front of restaurants, bars and clubs.

I wasn't being vague. I clearly showed you to my Tweets. They were very specific. Your 2nd paragraph is basic human rights. 3rd argument again you miss the point & I refer to my previous answer regarding that statement.

Who the hell goes out of their way to state something that is so simple in such a vague manner as "scope of our freedom" or "come and go", without stating explicit examples, someone who is arguing dishonestly that's who. There was no reason to state it like that, it would have been much easier to just simply state what you mean, so now it looks like you were doing it on purpose.

It's up to you how you interpret it. I left that open for you because both of us have different experiences in life & it would be wrong to place us both in the same box although we may have experienced the same thing in a different setting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"In order for Incels rights to succeed Women's rights must be violated"

I believe that was your title wasn't it @BlkPillPres?

1. Please validate the "illogical emotional arguments" part, I'm sure you can give an example and explain why its illogical and emotional

2. Please lets get down to the brass and tacks, what are you offering, you see let me tell whats illogical, telling someone they should stop doing X and offering no feasible and comparable alternative.

WHAT IS YOUR ALTERNATIVE?

WHAT ARE YOUR SOLUTIONS?

If you have none, then its you who is illogical.
Are you still Blackpilled Press or did someone hack into your account & is masquerading as you?
 
Last edited:
It's not a BS statement. Actually we can't go into bars, clubs or anything like that because we'd be stared out & looked upon as Lepers. You're not :blackpill:ed enough to see that has taken place & does take place. That's disingenious of you to negate others experiences & reality.

1. People staring at you is not the same as being PHYSICALLY INCAPABLE OF ACCESSING AN AREA, you fucking retard

If you cant tell the difference between someone making you feel uncomfortable, and someone PHYSICALLY stopping you from being somewhere then you are too fucking stupid for me to bother arguing with.

2. Idiot you do realize that the only way to stop what you're talking about here IS TO FORCE OTHER PEOPLE FROM THINKING AND ACTING A CERTAIN WAY (VIOLATING OTHER PEOPLES RIGHTS)

I'n done, you are clearly trolling, or too fucking stupid to see that at the end of the day you are literally advocating for peoples rights to be restricted, and you can't even see that, you can't stop people from staring and treating you like a leper without FORCING THEM, its WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS to do so, how can you not get something that simple smh, were arguing in circles, I'm done, enjoy being a hopeless idiot.
 
1. People staring at you is not the same as being PHYSICALLY INCAPABLE OF ACCESSING AN AREA, you fucking retard

If you cant tell the difference between someone making you feel uncomfortable, and someone PHYSICALLY stopping you from being somewhere then you are too fucking stupid for me to bother arguing with.

2. Idiot you do realize that the only way to stop what you're talking about here IS TO FORCE OTHER PEOPLE FROM THINKING AND ACTING A CERTAIN WAY (VIOLATING OTHER PEOPLES RIGHTS)

I'n done, you are clearly trolling, or too fucking stupid to see that at the end of the day you are literally advocating for peoples rights to be restricted, and you can't even see that, you can't stop people from staring and treating you like a leper without FORCING THEM, its WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS to do so, how can you not get something that simple smh, were arguing in circles, I'm done, enjoy being a hopeless idiot.

Triggered much? Being physically intimidated to prevent you from entering a certain area is as good as physically blocking them from entering it.

How are we violating their rights? Asking for basic human rights of our own so we are capable of being at the very least Normies at the very top Chads? Your conundum is weird & perplexing to say the least. I've just tweeted 6 tweets none of them advocating for what you say it is. It's arguing for equality & fairness. That's all.

We're arguing in circles because you never addressed my request for specifics & how you would implement it & what evidence have you got that you can implement it & what evidence have you got that when implemented it's sustainable. You've mentioned nothing about Violating Woman's rights. I've just said that we deserve yes us Ugly men deserve to be treated with basic Human Rights & Respect.

Dude. WTAF? Over these 2 days.
 
Put your money where your mouth is:

1. You say violence is the only answer & that threats work. I say assertiveness & forcefullness & warnings/ultimatums based on cause & effect contingencies work as it forces so & so to sit up & take notice. Not your LARPing faghotry Elliott Rodgers who couldn't do shit & did fuck all.
2. For those advocating violence & violent revolution. Put your money where your mouth is. Coward. You lead first. You're not even brave enough to interact with others on social media where the battles & skirmishes take place daily. You're all a flatter full of hot air at the end of the day.
3. Denying people their rights. Slavery/Concubinage? Have the guts to come out & say it. Too useless to implement it or even attempt it so you only shit post & fame whore in the hopes some mainstream media outlet picks up your nonsense. If you can't advocate it man to man with anyone either face to face or over social media than grow some balls, take your hand out of holding your cock & actually get to work. That simple. If you can't even interact with others how the fuck do you think you're going to reinstate your mythical nostalgic "patriarchy".
4. To all the pseudo intellectualism & other such nonsense from the self appointed intelligentsia. You're no better than Fontaine just reverse the message or theme. Only good thing is you respond.
5. Put your suggestions to people outside this forum to see if you can defend it. If you can't than you're useless & do sweet fuck all. That simple. Getting validation from your circle jerking buddies isn't validation. It's gay ass circle jerking.
6. Want to respond feel free to.

Waiting Mofos.
high iq

Dont be an edgy faggot shouting to OP to GO ER or GO PADDOCK in every thread if you're too much of a pussy to do it yourself.
 
Retard that is still vague, I can see you didn't google what vague means, what kind of nazism, how do we implement it in society, how to we overthrow the status quo to implement that form of nazism, I doubt you are so retarded you plan on promoting a type of nazism that excludes or discriminates against ethnics when most incels are basically ethnic, so no its still vague, you've given no specifics.

If a guy tells me he's looking to lose weight, and my response is "Exercise", that's a vague response you retard, I didn't give him a work out routine stating which exercises, how many sets and reps per exercise, if any dietary changes are involved, etc.

Do you get what vague is now idiot, I have to insult you because you've proven yourself to be a complete imbecile and illogical.

Looks like you also need to google "contradiction"

Replace "Nazism" with "Violation of Women's Rights"... What was that about it if I may ask other than Marital Rape in which you will get your balls broken in & dick broken in half.
high iq

Dont be an edgy faggot shouting to OP to GO ER or GO PADDOCK in every thread if you're too much of a pussy to do it yourself.

Thank you mate.
:feelsautistic: @Zod
Don't ruin his strawman argument for him, he has to create moral ultimatums to attempt to make a point, because his arguments revolve around morals (emotions) and not logic.

Bad form Mr not saying how you would violate women's rights.
Black Pilled Realists vs Blue Pilled Idealists

Still no results from your debating with anyone regarding implementing your ideas?

At least @Robtical has the balls to converse with Foids & Chads on his forum he helps run or what I'm told.

Cat still got your tongue Black Pill Ridiculous or you still going to come back with another misnoymer Red Herring fallacy?
 
Last edited:
high iq

Dont be an edgy faggot shouting to OP to GO ER or GO PADDOCK in every thread if you're too much of a pussy to do it yourself.

Translation:
Don't ask people who are already willing to kill themselves, to kill themselves in a manner that allows them to get revenge on the society that made suicidal, unless you are willing to also kill yourself even though you aren't suicidal to that extent.

Your logic is spot on mate (I think you need to rethink this argument, it may have sounded like it made sense when you said it in your head, when you break down this line of reasoning to its core and observe what its actually saying, it isn't logical at all.

The reason why we dial 911 during a criminal act is because we expect that there are people willing to do things that we aren't, your logic doesn't make any sense at all, there are so many jobs that exist that if we applied your logic the workers would say what you are saying to the people who called them

Fireman - "What you want me to risk my life and put out this fire, are you willing to run into this burning build, no, well stop being a faggot and shouting rescue my family members"
 
I'm ceasing now. Good Night & all the best.
 
Translation:
Don't ask people who are already willing to kill themselves, to kill themselves in a manner that allows them to get revenge on the society that made them want to kill themselves, unless you are willing to also kill yourself even though you aren't suicidal to that extent.

Your logic is spot on mate (I think you need to rethink this argument, it may have sounded like it made sense when you said it in your head, when you break down this line of reasoning to its core and observe what its actually saying, it isn't logical at all.
No. Its about the people who encourage OP to do something they would themselves never do.
 
No. Its about the people who encourage OP to do something they would themselves never do.

So you don't mean in general, you just mean for specifically and only @LittleBoy ?
 
So you don't mean in general, you just mean for specifically and only @LittleBoy ?

I think he means in general. The wikiquote is there for everyone to read. Plus I think this "Go ER" was brought up as solicitation to commit illegal activities. I think that was dealt with by 1 of the Mods. @SergeantIncel ?

Tag me out as I don't want to wake up to a fuck load of Alerts. Enjoy the rest of your day & take care.
 
1. People staring at you is not the same as being PHYSICALLY INCAPABLE OF ACCESSING AN AREA, you fucking retard

If you cant tell the difference between someone making you feel uncomfortable, and someone PHYSICALLY stopping you from being somewhere then you are too fucking stupid for me to bother arguing with.

2. Idiot you do realize that the only way to stop what you're talking about here IS TO FORCE OTHER PEOPLE FROM THINKING AND ACTING A CERTAIN WAY (VIOLATING OTHER PEOPLES RIGHTS)

I'n done, you are clearly trolling, or too fucking stupid to see that at the end of the day you are literally advocating for peoples rights to be restricted, and you can't even see that, you can't stop people from staring and treating you like a leper without FORCING THEM, its WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS to do so, how can you not get something that simple smh, were arguing in circles, I'm done, enjoy being a hopeless idiot.

He is being vague on purpose so that if you answer one way he switches the meaning after you answer to what he wants. When you asked him upfront what he means by "come & go" you cornered him because he didn't expect that, so he had to come up with something like freedom to enter clubs and shit (jfl).

Basically, you try to make very clear statements while he just blurbs out a random string, a word salad, so you waste more time trying to decipher it. After you take your time to reply, again, with a very clear answer, he responds with another vague incomprehensible word salad (which takes no effort at all btw).

Any moron can write such vague replies, eg:

"The state of our course is not on stable grounds if the relevant discourse doesn't meet the course it's meant to meet to begin with."

That is called trolling btw

He is a capital traitor and a troll deserving an immediate permaban, you completely blew his cover
 
He is being vague on purpose so that if you answer one way he switches the meaning after you answer to what he wants. When you asked him upfront what he means by "come & go" you cornered him because he didn't expect that, so he had to come up with something like freedom to enter clubs and shit (jfl).

That whole freedom to go places argument didn't even make any sense and sounded like he pulled something out of his ass last minute, also ironically his examples still lead to us having to restrict the rights of people to get what we want, the guy literally wants to get people to stop staring at incels and making them feel uncomfortable, JFL how are you going to get that done without restricting someones ability to act and restricting their free speech.

At this point I also have to assume he is a troll, might not even be a "he", I'm seeing a lot of larps popping up these days.
 
That whole freedom to go places argument didn't even make any sense and sounded like he pulled something out of his ass last minute, also ironically his examples still lead to us having to restrict the rights of people to get what we want, the guy literally wants to get people to stop staring at incels and making them feel uncomfortable, JFL how are you going to get that done without restricting someones ability to act and restricting their free speech.

At this point I also have to assume he is a troll, might not even be a "he", I'm seeing a lot of larps popping up these days.
I have a theory that some CuckTears activists are willing to pay good money to buy an account on this site that has many posts/early join date/respected to do some high level infiltration. That's why you can see some members who were blackpilled turn into blupilled traitors - they're not the same person
 
Translation:
Don't ask people who are already willing to kill themselves, to kill themselves in a manner that allows them to get revenge on the society that made suicidal, unless you are willing to also kill yourself even though you aren't suicidal to that extent.

Your logic is spot on mate (I think you need to rethink this argument, it may have sounded like it made sense when you said it in your head, when you break down this line of reasoning to its core and observe what its actually saying, it isn't logical at all.

The reason why we dial 911 during a criminal act is because we expect that there are people willing to do things that we aren't, your logic doesn't make any sense at all, there are so many jobs that exist that if we applied your logic the workers would say what you are saying to the people who called them

Fireman - "What you want me to risk my life and put out this fire, are you willing to run into this burning build, no, well stop being a faggot and shouting rescue my family members"

Assuming a fireman or Police can be put on the same job spec as "Elliot Rodger"?

Real stupid.

He is being vague on purpose so that if you answer one way he switches the meaning after you answer to what he wants. When you asked him upfront what he means by "come & go" you cornered him because he didn't expect that, so he had to come up with something like freedom to enter clubs and shit (jfl).

Basically, you try to make very clear statements while he just blurbs out a random string, a word salad, so you waste more time trying to decipher it. After you take your time to reply, again, with a very clear answer, he responds with another vague incomprehensible word salad (which takes no effort at all btw).

Any moron can write such vague replies, eg:

"The state of our course is not on stable grounds if the relevant discourse doesn't meet the course it's meant to meet to begin with."

That is called trolling btw

He is a capital traitor and a troll deserving an immediate permaban, you completely blew his cover

Point out to me where I'm being vague? If you can't comprehend then I suggest you get a thesaurus. Words have multiple meanings. Keep up with me. You cannot provide anything specific just like Black Pill Ridiculous because you're waffling & just bluffing.

Me trolling you. I suggest you're just too stupid to comprehend anything.

I suggest you are the IT Larper mr.
That whole freedom to go places argument didn't even make any sense and sounded like he pulled something out of his ass last minute, also ironically his examples still lead to us having to restrict the rights of people to get what we want, the guy literally wants to get people to stop staring at incels and making them feel uncomfortable, JFL how are you going to get that done without restricting someones ability to act and restricting their free speech.

At this point I also have to assume he is a troll, might not even be a "he", I'm seeing a lot of larps popping up these days.

You're making it a false dichotomy again. I presented to you, your own words & you couldn't come back even when I linked it here. That's your problem.
I have a theory that some CuckTears activists are willing to pay good money to buy an account on this site that has many posts/early join date/respected to do some high level infiltration. That's why you can see some members who were blackpilled turn into blupilled traitors - they're not the same person

Would that be you?
If I keep on replying to @BlkPillPres & @Zod I think these 2 cowards would report me to the Mods for hurting their feelings under the false claim of harassment.

Gentlemen if you keep persisting. Keep on expecting a reply. That simple.
 
Assuming a fireman or Police can be put on the same job spec as "Elliot Rodger"?

Real stupid.



Point out to me where I'm being vague? If you can't comprehend then I suggest you get a thesaurus. Words have multiple meanings. Keep up with me. You cannot provide anything specific just like Black Pill Ridiculous because you're waffling & just bluffing.

Me trolling you. I suggest you're just too stupid to comprehend anything.

I suggest you are the IT Larper mr.


You're making it a false dichotomy again. I presented to you, your own words & you couldn't come back even when I linked it here. That's your problem.


Would that be you?
If I keep on replying to @BlkPillPres & @Zod I think these 2 cowards would report me to the Mods for hurting their feelings under the false claim of harassment.

Gentlemen if you keep persisting. Keep on expecting a reply. That simple.
You lost all credibility on this forum at this point, you're out!
 
Put your money where your mouth is:

1. You say violence is the only answer & that threats work. I say assertiveness & forcefullness & warnings/ultimatums based on cause & effect contingencies work as it forces so & so to sit up & take notice. Not your LARPing faghotry Elliott Rodgers who couldn't do shit & did fuck all.
2. For those advocating violence & violent revolution. Put your money where your mouth is. Coward. You lead first. You're not even brave enough to interact with others on social media where the battles & skirmishes take place daily. You're all a flatter full of hot air at the end of the day.
3. Denying people their rights. Slavery/Concubinage? Have the guts to come out & say it. Too useless to implement it or even attempt it so you only shit post & fame whore in the hopes some mainstream media outlet picks up your nonsense. If you can't advocate it man to man with anyone either face to face or over social media than grow some balls, take your hand out of holding your cock & actually get to work. That simple. If you can't even interact with others how the fuck do you think you're going to reinstate your mythical nostalgic "patriarchy".
4. To all the pseudo intellectualism & other such nonsense from the self appointed intelligentsia. You're no better than Fontaine just reverse the message or theme. Only good thing is you respond.
5. Put your suggestions to people outside this forum to see if you can defend it. If you can't than you're useless & do sweet fuck all. That simple. Getting validation from your circle jerking buddies isn't validation. It's gay ass circle jerking.
6. Want to respond feel free to.

Waiting Mofos.
I agree too many people are edgy on the internet and don’t do any real shit. For me though I’m working on my cult but for others here I have no idea what their game is
 
I agree too many people are edgy on the internet and don’t do any real shit. For me though I’m working on my cult but for others here I have no idea what their game is

I just think they're edgy fuck wits. That's all I've said. Cringe Coper wanted to write how to "Violate or Restrict Foid rights"? Showed me no example other than Marital Rape. When questioned. Went into melt down. Bizarre. Has somebody hacked his account.
That whole freedom to go places argument didn't even make any sense and sounded like he pulled something out of his ass last minute, also ironically his examples still lead to us having to restrict the rights of people to get what we want, the guy literally wants to get people to stop staring at incels and making them feel uncomfortable, JFL how are you going to get that done without restricting someones ability to act and restricting their free speech.

At this point I also have to assume he is a troll, might not even be a "he", I'm seeing a lot of larps popping up these days.

Still no examples? Specifics? Gutless & Balless at the same time? Come on Amigo. You can do better than waste our time with your incomprehensible & inconsistent drivel which you've bluffed as "High IQ" for sometime now it would seem.
 
Last edited:
Still no examples? Specifics? Gutless & Balless at the same time? Come on Amigo. You can do better than waste our time with your incomprehensible & inconsistent drivel which you've bluffed as "High IQ" for sometime now it would seem.
There is no doubt anymore that this is a cuckTears poster
 
There is no doubt anymore that this is a cuckTears poster

Cucktears poster all because I handed you 2 your arses with some derogatory insults thrown in?

K. Den. I would say you're a saboteur & LARPer as you want to mischaracterise us ALL as something Cucktears would like us to appear as.
 
Cucktears poster all because I handed you 2 your arses with some derogatory insults thrown in?

K. Den. I would say you're a saboteur & LARPer as you want to mischaracterise us ALL as something Cucktears would like us to appear as.
You didn't hand over anything, you lost every single argument to the point of replying nonsense just to appear of having the last word. You're out
 
You didn't hand over anything, you lost every single argument to the point of replying nonsense just to appear of having the last word. You're out

Vanity. Losing every single argument. A pidgeon knocks over chess pieces & then claims victory. Nice try Bird Brain.
PS you never replied to me in my last thread at around 1 am this morning. Care to reply?
 
Gentlemen if you keep persisting. Keep on expecting a reply. That simple.

JFL why would we want you to not reply, I would not message someone if that was my goal, I'd just stop messaging you.

Cucktears poster all because I handed you 2 your arses with some derogatory insults thrown in?

JFL dude are you having memory problems, you literally said this:
Triggered much? Being physically intimidated to prevent you from entering a certain area is as good as physically blocking them from entering it.

People giving you "weird looks" and making you feel "uncomfortable" being at a place IS NOT "PHYSICAL INTIMIDATION", you are being disingenuous and you know it, you are grasping for straws with these BS arguments. Physical intimidation IS PHYSICAL INTIMIDATION, being threatened in a physical manner, not people making you "feel bad" with "weird looks"

You are only handing your own ass over to yourself, all you've made are purposefully vague arguments and/or disingenuous arguments. You know for a fact nobody is going to read your example of "physical intimidation" and not call BS. That's without a doubt not what physical intimidation is and you can't deny that.

You could say its social intimidation, emotional intimidation, but physical no.
 
JFL why would we want you to not reply, I would not message someone if that was my goal, I'd just stop messaging you.



JFL dude are you having memory problems, you literally said this:


People giving you "weird looks" and making you feel "uncomfortable" being at a place IS NOT "PHYSICAL INTIMIDATION", you are being disingenuous and you know it, you are grasping for straws with these BS arguments. Physical intimidation IS PHYSICAL INTIMIDATION, being threatened in a physical manner, not people making you "feel bad" with "weird looks"

You are only handing your own ass over to yourself, all you've made are purposefully vague arguments and/or disingenuous arguments. You know for a fact nobody is going to read your example of "physical intimidation" and not call BS. That's without a doubt not what physical intimidation is and you can't deny that.

You could say its social intimidation, emotional intimidation, but physical no.

Fair enough. Carry on replying. I'll do likewise.

I said that & I meant it. How do you know what physical examples of intimidation there are? Have you experienced them all yourself? Why are you so quick to discount others life experiences?

I'm not handing my ass over to anyone. You've just been outed today as a Bluff Merchant & Shyster Scammer with your pseudo intellectualism & E Fame Whoring writing incomprehensible incoherent edgy shit crap. That's all.
@BlkPillPres your stupidity is really showing.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/...ss/201601/15-control-tactics-difficult-people
http://www.ladybugbooks.com/harass.htm

2 articles. Read & weep.
 
Vanity. Losing every single argument. A pidgeon knocks over chess pieces & then claims victory. Nice try Bird Brain.
PS you never replied to me in my last thread at around 1 am this morning. Care to reply?
That's exactly why I didn't reply, because for every clear reply I gave you, you facerolled the keyboard/touchpad with nonsense. You're afraid to come out as a full blown feminist so your investment of 200 bucks that you paid for this account doesn't go to waste too early
 
That's exactly why I didn't reply, because for every clear reply I gave you, you facerolled the keyboard/touchpad with nonsense. You're afraid to come out as a full blown feminist so you investment of 200 bucks that you paid for this account doesn't go to waste to early

You gave no clear reply which I wasn't able to easily destroy. You type that I write nonsense forgetting that the IQ graph shows that women appear to be overall smarter than Men without any footnotes attached? Are you really this stupid?

A full blown feminist my arse. I'd say you're a full blown EEEJJJJIIIITTT more like. 200 bucks. Making slanderous & unproven at all accusations. Oh Mr you are really are way out of your league here.
 
2 articles. Read & weep.

The first one didn't even really relate to physical intimidation

The 2nd one ironically says I'm right about what physical intimidation is

PhysInt


Did you even read the things you posted, seems like your main strategy is really just to pull things out of your ass and hope they stick.
 
The first one didn't even relate to physical intimidation

The 2nd one ironically says I'm right about what physical intimidation is

View attachment 76191

Did you even read the things you posted, seems like your main strategy is really just to pull things out of your ass and hope they stick.

Yes I do.

Do you?

Point 7

1546201195915


Again are you denying that those Incels who I said experienced that, including myself did not experience that? Can you say where I wrongfully stated what Physical Intimidation was in this whole thread?
1546201338756


Just so you don't try & edit out to conceal your idiocy.
 
Yes I do.

Do you?

Point 7

View attachment 76192

Intimidation in the way you described it, as in a malicious way, IMPLIES INTENT, a man height mogging you isn't his fault JFL, people looking at something they think is weird, with a "weird look" is not not intentional intimidation, that's why your argument that you are going to ask people to give you "basic human rights (decency)" is retarded, because they are giving you that, they aren't doing these things on purpose smh, stop grasping for straws, your arguments are absolute shit JFL.

View attachment 76196

Just so you don't try & edit out to conceal your idiocy.

JFL the only person here who should delete anything is you, you are literally claiming that someone giving you a weird look is physical intimidation, other than the obvious thing - "THEY THINK YOU LOOK WEIRD". You are trying to stretch the definition of physical intimidation and failing.

Do you see the irony that you are doing to "physical intimidation" what feminists have done to "sexual assault".

Men are getting arrested for "cat calling" in some countries, you are seeming more and more like larping female bit by bit.

Don't say you didn't imply intent when you made posts like this:
I haven't forced them to do anything other than show us basic human rights what I stated in those tweets.

Unless you are seriously asking them to stop doing something you think they don involuntarily JFL
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

F
Replies
29
Views
636
Saigon Depression
S
NIKOCADO AVOCADO
Replies
6
Views
173
chudjak
chudjak
RealSchizo
Replies
5
Views
111
InsidiousKoala
InsidiousKoala
Third Eye
Replies
27
Views
795
sexualeconomist
sexualeconomist
Nordicel94
Replies
11
Views
265
Friezacel
Friezacel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top