Many on reddit and twitter hate it and refer to it as art theft which is obvious nonsense. I personally think it's great for generating hentai instead of waiting for some faggot to draw it
It's ugly as shit.
It’s whatever but the only reason there’s such a fuss is cus it takes away from a trannies self delusion of talent lol
Soulless slop that should be banned in most cases
M
leftist normies hate it because "IT ROBS MUH ARTIST OF JOBS ANS MONEY" and they morally grand stand as if they aren't using phones with minerals gathered by slave labor in africa
personally i have no issues with it and acknowledge its the way of the future
personally i have no issues with it and acknowledge its the way of the future
M
M
exactly
M
the reality we live in is far more soulless than AI art
It’s gay
retarded troons hate it but it's also ugly and very overused
complicated shit tbh, outright intractable conundrum
complicated shit tbh, outright intractable conundrum
Some of it has gotten really good. But its not as good that it can be used for commercial use - Lego tried it and it backfired.
It's okay
most of it looks like slop
theres this ai chicken billboard i drive by everyday and it drives me nuts
theres this ai chicken billboard i drive by everyday and it drives me nuts
Most of it is ugly or reeks of being fake as shit. There are just a few that have managed to catch my attention and they overflood majority of pornsites now.
K
Well obviously its hard to make it realistic but the anime style is pretty good
I am extremely positive about AI. The more AI takes jobs away from the normies, the fewer betabuxers there will be - former normies will become incels and join our ranks - the number of incels will become huge and the chance that the state will solve our problems will be higher.
Ai porn is better
The art created by AI is simply like eating chocolate with the taste of poop: it simply appears something innovative, unique and beautiful, but if investigated properly it will be obvious and superficial. Let me explain better, the images created by AI are copies of other artists that have been assembled differently (a bit like if the Lego pieces were of the same object, but colored differently, even if in this case they are "drawn" differently), if I understand correctly The AI mixes a certain number of images and based on those it creates an algorithm that resembles those of other artists, namely OTHER ARTISTS. Does this seem normal to you? Did someone fucking ask permission to copy the style of these artists? Because of this AI, the artists will see their style copied and pasted over another drawing mostly done by non-human machines. The funny thing is that from what I understand companies don't give a damn about the artists who have worked hard to become such, they only care about selling their product, ignoring the ethics of people. Here I basically have a negative opinion when it comes to cases like these, I'm not completely negative I think there are also good uses (maybe in the case where a person could not afford to pay an artist), but it should be done under specific rules, exactly like today before buying a food product it is regulated by (in my case that I am in Europe it is this) EFSA (European Food Safety Agency) I mean that everything must be organized, thought out, processed, in a unique and singular way for each individual case.
Not a big fan but some of it can be ok
Soulless garbage
In my humble opinion, AI is not necesarily bad, but it should be severely regulated, it is an incredibly dangerous technology.
Damn she has nice feet
i'd want to side with artists in a general sense because i wouldnt want my job taken by AI but i just dont see the logical argument of why AI art is stealing
Can someone recommend some AI though?
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
