![SchrodingersDick](/data/avatars/m/11/11951.jpg?1550254206)
SchrodingersDick
Better incel than jestermaxxing for scraps
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2018
- Posts
- 8,478
Translation: “I’d never have sex with you free. You’re not hot or fun and I do not lust for you. You must provide and invest in me to get a fraction of the reward that other men got for free. Sex with you is transactional.”
The guys seem to understand that this is a stake in the heart, but the girls are absolutely lost. Throwing around lots of “shoulds” where none belong. Add this to the list of things girls don’t understand.
1: POV
2: averages
3: paternal uncertainty
4: this
a good number 5 would be that they don’t consciously understand the source of their value. Instinctively, they know that they are holes to fuck (betrayed by their intrasexual competition for a mate, which is to make themselves look as fertile/enjoyable to fuck), but they pretend that female value has more than one source. Perhaps they project this appraisal of women onto men, like a male version of strategic plurality. “One category of women for x, another for y.”
The guys seem to understand that this is a stake in the heart, but the girls are absolutely lost. Throwing around lots of “shoulds” where none belong. Add this to the list of things girls don’t understand.
1: POV
2: averages
3: paternal uncertainty
4: this
a good number 5 would be that they don’t consciously understand the source of their value. Instinctively, they know that they are holes to fuck (betrayed by their intrasexual competition for a mate, which is to make themselves look as fertile/enjoyable to fuck), but they pretend that female value has more than one source. Perhaps they project this appraisal of women onto men, like a male version of strategic plurality. “One category of women for x, another for y.”