That thread was talking about rape as some objectively enjoyable thing for all women.
You didn't read the thread (or for some reason you just can't understand what I kept saying over and over), all you did was make assertions, the point of the thread is that you can't "mutilate" yourself and its fine, but if someone mutilates you the same way by force (to a lesser extent) its now this traumatic event you can't get over
If a woman can get gangbanged for an hour in all holes by 10 guys with 10 inches, its ridiculous for her to claim to be mentally and physically traumatized by a single 5 incher forcing himself on her vaginally for like 15 mins
That's my point, women can't claim that the act of rape is more traumatic than a lot of the stuff they put themselves through, and magically because they consented those things weren't as bad, that makes no logical sense
If you eat shit by choice, and then someone comes across and shoves shit down your throat, you can't act as if that shit is not disgusting because it was forced, the act was disgusting to begin with
Are you getting the point yet?
This is why I said -
CONSENT DOES NOT CHANGE THE IMPACT OR NATURE OF AN ACT
Someone consenting to something, doesn't magically change whether its an extreme/degrading thing or not, you sound like a woman, a gangbang doesn't becoming "empowering" just because a woman consented, its still a violent and degrading thing regardless of consent
I don't know how many ways I can explain something this simple