Blackpill There's so little research into female-perpetrated sexual assaults that we still aren't sure what traits predict it.

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Everybody knows that there's tons more research into male-perpetrated sexual assaults than female ones, nothing else could be expected in our gynocentric society where "women are wonderful" is the motto everyone lives and thinks by, but it's this kind of stuff that really opens your eyes into how lopsided the research is. On the one hand, male-perpetrated sexual assault and female victimization has been studied from all possible and impossible angles by now.

Just look at this couple of studies I quickly found, for example, to get a sense of what I mean (spoilered because of space):

Spoiler: Studies

Prospective predictors of technology-based sexual coercion by college males.

Men's heterosocial skill and attitudes toward women as predictors of verbal sexual coercion and forceful rape

“You would if you loved me”: Toward an improved conceptual and etiological understanding of nonphysical male sexual coercion

Coercive-sexting: Predicting adolescent initial exposure to electronic coercive sexual dating violence

French validation of the Tactics First-Sexual Experiences Survey–Perpetrator in heterosexual men.

Minority stress and intimate partner violence among sexual and gender minorities assigned female at birth.

The opposite (female perpetration and male victimization), however, is so understudied that we still lack so much as a relatively-clear idea of what the predictors and correlates of it are.

Take a look at those four recent studies into the phenomena:

Sexual Coercion Perpetration and Victimization: Gender Similarities and Differences in Adolescence

The Dark Triad and Sexual Assertiveness Predict Sexual Coercion Differently in Men and Women

Gender Differences in Sexual Coercion Perpetration: Investigating the Role of Alcohol-use and Cognitive Risk Factors

Understanding Sexual Harassment Through an Individual and Relational Lens: Are Risk Factors the Same for Female and Male Perpetrators?

The first one finds just about no differences between the personality profiles of rapists of both genders and the reasons why they do it, with both groups being highly similar and only victimization seeing some gender differences:

1,242 Spanish adolescents (15-19 years old) were surveyed... It was also concluded that need for control and power, normative beliefs about sexual coercion, hostile sexism, negative alcohol expectancies, and sociosexual orientation were significant predictors of perpetration for both genders. Concerning victimization, need for control and power and normative beliefs were found to be significant predictors for males and females, as were negative alcohol expectancies and sexual esteem, though only for males.

The second one goes strongly against the first one and finds significant differences among male and female rapists:

We found that the Dark Triad was a stronger predictor of sexual coercion in men than in women. In men, all the Dark Triad components were significantly, positively correlated with sexual coercion, and narcissism and Machiavellianism had significant, negative correlations with sexual assertiveness. In women, only narcissism had a significant, positive correlation with sexual coercion, and the Dark Triad traits were not correlated with sexual assertiveness. In regression analyses, controlling for shared variance between the predictor variables, high secondary psychopathy, and low sexual assertiveness emerged as significant predictors of coercion in men. Only narcissism was a significant positive predictor in women.

The third one, once again and much like the first one, finds almost no differences in the area it was focused on:

Results revealed that (1) for both men and women, alcohol-use as well as cognitive variables allowed to discriminate perpetrators from non-perpetrators, (2) perpetrators, whether male or female, did not differ significantly on any of the risk factors, except for alcohol-related RMA, (3) a prediction model that considered cognitive variables, as well as alcohol-use significantly contributed to the explanation of both male and female sexual coercion, and (4) the prediction model explained three times the amount of variance in sexual coercion perpetrated by men compared to women.

Then, there comes the fourth one, which once again flips the script and finds a lot of differences between male and female teens who rape:

A national sample of youth, ages 14 and 15, were recruited via social media and surveyed online (N = 1,981). At the individual level, girls who sexually harassed others, were more likely to have a propensity to respond to stimuli with anger compared to boys who sexually harassed. At the relational level, girls who sexually harassed were more likely to be victims of sexual harassment compared to boys, and having a negative peer environment (have delinquent peers, seen someone get attacked, and know someone who has been sexually assaulted) was of particular importance in understanding why girls harass others. For boys who harass, family relations, having seen or heard about peer physical or sexual assault and bullying perpetration were important for contextualizing boys’ sexual harassment. As empathy increased, the relative odds of sexually harassing decreased for girls.

Of course, there's even the typical stuff about females raping because they themselves were raped and some stuff about how females rape less the more empathetic they are while levels of empathy are apparently meaningless for boys, but there are some funny gems, such as the mentions of female rapists being more likely to respond angrily to outside stimuli and male bullies being more likely to rape than non-bullies, which is hilarious since we know that bullies have more sexual partners than non-bullies and this shows us that even teen females have shit personality detectors .

Still, the point stands. We have four recent studies which maybe aren't mutually incompatible, but it's hard to think of how they could fit together. The first one finds basically no differences in the personalities of male and female rapists, which contrasts heavily with the second and especially the fourth one, which is a major problem since while the fourth one was done on 14-15-year-olds, the first one was on 15-19-year-olds. The second one also clearly doesn't fit with the first one, since narcissism alone can't explain such similarity between personalities and motives between the two groups of rapists.

Meanwhile, as I've said at the beginning, there's so much research into male-perpetrated rape that at this point, lots of such research is really niche and looks at stuff such as how the online communities those guys frequent correlate with their likelihood of doing so.

Thoughts?

 

[Moroccancel]

Women can only abuse vulnerable subjects such as children or people in their power, such as students. The woman uses persuasion and indirect coercion to reach her goals.

Preventing the foid from using a strapon, I can't think of another way a woman could rape a man. What's more, the penis, as a separate and male sexual object in situations of authentic disgust, I doubt that it maintains a stable erection.

 

[PLA1092]

Because they're sociopathic and selfish whores who can't stop themselves from doing it even if they have a perfectly legal avenue to have sex with whoever they could possibly want. They know no one's about to stop them or report it, so why not?

 

[Newton the 2nd]

Soyciety will never address that