Problem is women are still gold digging and now since they have the ability to work and make money too, their standards for digging gold are higher.
You said "betabuxxers brutally competing with one-another" - That is still the norm today anyways, but like I said above, since women have the ability to work and make money for themselves, and they can own property, now they can judge men even more harshly.
I kinda get your point, but it if you look at it rationally it doesn't really make sense, traditionalism is always the better deal, because all the negatives you claim would have happened due to it,
STILL HAPPENED AND ARE IRONICALLY MORE PRONOUNCED BECAUSE WOMEN HAVE RIGHTS AND INCOME STREAMS OF THEIR OWN.
If only men could work, earn money and property, then women would have no choice but to date and mate within their league.
Your argument basically summarizes into - "If not for feminism women would have been
dependent whores"
Good, that sounds like a better deal, it keeps the sexes honest, men want women for sex and reproduction, women want men for shelter, security and material resources. That is a fair deal, that is a less chaotic system, it keeps people honest and logical.
But since feminism took place
WOMEN ARE INDEPENDENT WHORES, THEY STILL GET TO BE WHORES AND BE EVEN MORE PICKY THAN THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN IF THEY WERE FORCED INTO A TRADITIONAL MODEL.
I'll take a model that creates dependent whores over one that creates independent whores any day, women have too much leverage these days and that's whats screwing up society and the dynamics of romantic relationships between males and females.
I don't think you are actually putting thought into this. Your argument doesn't even make sense upon a surface level analysis, men would actually have more control in your proposed traditional outcome despite the negatives, in the Scandinavian model
MEN HAVE NO FUCKING CONTROL AT ALL.
Just to make all my points clear and put the nail in the coffin for this thing.
1. "women would be socialized into gold-digging" - Women don't have to be socialized into being gold diggers, its in their nature, they do this shit as children even.
Also, women are still gold digging whores under the current model, so your point is a non-point.
2. "my country would either become mail-orde-bride central, with rich foerigners cucking local men" - That is happening anyways, and if you are an ethnic (like myself) you see this shit happening in your own country anyways, white men just come to our countries and become God's, especially if they have money, so no, feminism did not stop women from doing this,
IT MADE IT EASIER (my body, my rules, no social ostracism)
3. "betabuxxers brutally competing with one-another since gold-digging would be completely normalized, even expected and encouraged." - Again I'm starting to wonder which reality you exist in, are you posting this message from an alternate reality, because this is the reality the average man faces
DUE TO FEMINISM. This should be common sense - "The more money women have, the higher the standard of income they'll expect from a betabuxxer"
If a woman makes 5 figures she isn't going to bother getting a betabux who makes 4 figures, get the point, giving women the opportunity to earn for themselves and have rights is what ruined society, they don't have to date fairly, they don't have to fuck or date within their league.
