Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious There would be riots if we could blackpill most men on the dual mating strategy

gylo

gylo

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Posts
784
Scientists have proved the extent to which a woman's behavior is mediated by a strategic motivation to seek the best genes, no matter what. They've verfied that women will seek uglier, more reliable men while they aren't fertile, and wait until peak conception chance to fuck a Chad.

There's no getting around this fact. Even without the studies, it makes enough sense that one would be able to determine this via common sense. It's just that most men deliberately shied themselves from the truth as a protective instict. They really don't want to know.

There was this one study where women were asked to rank men on their expected personal qualities based on evaluation of a headshot. After going through hundreds of men, they found that attractive men are rated as being better in EVERY SINGLE TRAIT, from generosity, kindness, intelligence, etc. All except one. The attractive men were rated as likely being WORSE PARENTS.

Alpha fucks beta bucks is hard wired into every woman's brain. It is the greatest fantasy for any woman to be ravaged by Chad's big cock, then let a beta male pick up the pieces and raise his wife's son.

Here's the source for a reference to the study:
https://www.nytimes.com/1981/09/01/...nd-to-run-surprisingly-deep.html?pagewanted=1
 
Civilization can only exist as long as there is a slave class (what we now call the working/middle class). That class needs to accept and believe in society, and have faith that it is ultimately good.

A blackpilled society can't exist.
 
Low value men are meek by nature. Tell them all and they won't do anything. There's a reason all the black TFL and incel Youtubers are autistic manlets and don't put out any thug vibe
 
A blackpilled society can't exist.
Patriarchies had foids under control because they knew they weren't to be trusted. A blackpilled patriarchy is what we need.
Low value men are meek by nature. Tell them all and they won't do anything. There's a reason all the black TFL and incel Youtubers are autistic manlets and don't put out any thug vibe
Those aren't all incels. Lots of gymcels would roid out if they got blackpilled and beat the shit out some random whores.
 
Civilization can only exist as long as there is a slave class (what we now call the working/middle class). That class needs to accept and believe in society, and have faith that it is ultimately good.

A blackpilled society can't exist.
 
If men manage to wrest control of civilisation from women before they collapse it, one of the things we will introduce is mandatory DNA testing for every child alive.
 
If men manage to wrest control of civilisation from women before they collapse it, one of the things we will introduce is mandatory DNA testing for every child alive.

I´m also convinced they will test them also in order to exclude telegony, assuming that exists the technology to make it possible.
 
Civilization can only exist as long as there is a slave class (what we now call the working/middle class). That class needs to accept and believe in society, and have faith that it is ultimately good.

A blackpilled society can't exist.
 
Dual mating strategy may just be the most potent blackpill there is.
 
The problem is that the average male human IQ is probably more like 80-90 instead of 100 so this is not currently possible unless it becomes so big and popular that there can be no denying it
 
I´m also convinced they will test them also in order to exclude telegony, assuming that exists the technology to make it possible.
How fascinating, it is not often that I learn a new word. Thank you.
 
Most men will deny it exists or ignore us.
 
Female nature disgusts me.
 
There was a study that took a picture of Chad and normie and showed them to women. The profiles stated the Chad work in retail making 25k a year and the normie had a high professional career making $$$.
All the women rates the Chad lower than the normie.
Scientists stated women think like that cause on a genetic level they want the best provider for their children. A man could afford a $5 date but a women couldn't. If she got pregnant she was tied down for at least nine months (pregnancy) and so many years after raising a child while a man could walk away at almost anytime.
 
How fascinating, it is not often that I learn a new word. Thank you.

Thanks. :) I bet that if the betabuxes who managed to get offspring somehow realize their progeny is tainted, probably they would go ER.
 
Thanks. :) I bet that if the betabuxes who managed to get offspring somehow realize their progeny is tainted, probably they would go ER.
Its actually a really creepy and unsettling idea this could happen. I’m not sure why. The tainting I mean.
 
Civilization can only exist as long as there is a slave class (what we now call the working/middle class). That class needs to accept and believe in society, and have faith that it is ultimately good.

A blackpilled society can't exist.

High IQ
 
Unfortunatley the white armor of the cucks have very high blackpill resistance
 
Honestly, I think the dual mating strategy has been known about for a long time. Fuck, there are romance novels about the distinction between the dashing but unreliable Alpha and the dependable but unappealing Beta from at least the 19th century and probably before that (probably since the end of feudalism or something...) These are not new ideas. But what is different is, perhaps:

1) Men have lost or given up their moral and social authority over women such that women's thirst for Chad is unconstrained. Its social corrosiveness is either denied, or the very premise that social corrosion is bad is rejected because social cohesiveness is regarded as undermining the "supreme" value of individual liberty. You can break this down into many different sub-factors if you want: male desire for a virginal or at least relatively chaste partner is derided as controlling; women's sexual appetite is regarded as something to be nurtured rather than constrained; familial bonds have been eroded such that the role of father as protector from predatory males is undermined; women's acquisitiveness and status obsession is magnified in a materialistic and spiritually bereft society, etc, etc..
2) People are more narcissistic and less likely to accept an unsatisfying lot in life -- this includes both the reluctance of women to settle for an unremarkable provider and the diminished desire of men to be unremarkable providers. I get the sense that in the past men who "manned up" and married slutty or wayward women or who "kept" women who got their dick elsewhere recognised that this was a somewhat demeaning fate but accepted it because i) they had a social role to play and ii) they regarded the alternative -- LDAR -- as significantly less appealing.
3) People put a lot more freight on their romantic relationships now, with the result that they are less satisfied with them. Various kinds of social institutions and relationships are fraying and disappearing -- families are becoming smaller and more dispersed; people have fewer friends; people change jobs more and so are less likely to build nurturing relationships through workplaces; the church is in decline; and other, secular, form of civic institutions are disappearing. When people have fewer meaningful social connections they need more different kinds of benefits and satisfactions within each connection they do have. This is difficult in a romantic relationship because the innate and cultural differences between men and women make aspects of most relationships between them difficult or unfulfilling. In general, the decline in cultural sexual dimorphism has made the purpose of romantic relationships less obvious.
4) Tinder and hypergamy. Honestly you all know the score with this one and it is admittedly a late-comer but I honestly think it could be a game-changer or at least a major game-change-accentuater. Even if it just enables the realisation of desires that were present anyway.
 
Honestly, I think the dual mating strategy has been known about for a long time. Fuck, there are romance novels about the distinction between the dashing but unreliable Alpha and the dependable but unappealing Beta from at least the 19th century and probably before that (probably since the end of feudalism or something...) These are not new ideas. But what is different is, perhaps:

1) Men have lost or given up their moral and social authority over women such that women's thirst for Chad is unconstrained. Its social corrosiveness is either denied, or the very premise that social corrosion is bad is rejected because social cohesiveness is regarded as undermining the "supreme" value of individual liberty. You can break this down into many different sub-factors if you want: male desire for a virginal or at least relatively chaste partner is derided as controlling; women's sexual appetite is regarded as something to be nurtured rather than constrained; familial bonds have been eroded such that the role of father as protector from predatory males is undermined; women's acquisitiveness and status obsession is magnified in a materialistic and spiritually bereft society, etc, etc..
2) People are more narcissistic and less likely to accept an unsatisfying lot in life -- this includes both the reluctance of women to settle for an unremarkable provider and the diminished desire of men to be unremarkable providers. I get the sense that in the past men who "manned up" and married slutty or wayward women or who "kept" women who got their dick elsewhere recognised that this was a somewhat demeaning fate but accepted it because i) they had a social role to play and ii) they regarded the alternative -- LDAR -- as significantly less appealing.
3) People put a lot more freight on their romantic relationships now, with the result that they are less satisfied with them. Various kinds of social institutions and relationships are fraying and disappearing -- families are becoming smaller and more dispersed; people have fewer friends; people change jobs more and so are less likely to build nurturing relationships through workplaces; the church is in decline; and other, secular, form of civic institutions are disappearing. When people have fewer meaningful social connections they need more different kinds of benefits and satisfactions within each connection they do have. This is difficult in a romantic relationship because the innate and cultural differences between men and women make aspects of most relationships between them difficult or unfulfilling. In general, the decline in cultural sexual dimorphism has made the purpose of romantic relationships less obvious.
4) Tinder and hypergamy. Honestly you all know the score with this one and it is admittedly a late-comer but I honestly think it could be a game-changer or at least a major game-change-accentuater. Even if it just enables the realisation of desires that were present anyway.

didn't read tbh ngl
 
Its actually a really creepy and unsettling idea this could happen. I’m not sure why. The tainting I mean.

Well, from a mechanistic standpoint this happens because the sperm of previous males exerts an epigenetic conditioning on the bystander female eggs, at least this appears to be accurately backed up by animal models. I would call it a form of "soft" cucking, while paternity fraud is "hard" cucking. I agree, it's fucking unsettling to realize how many repercussions the dualistic mating strategy of femoids can have.
 
The elites will never allow this to happen. They profit off the current sociopolitical climate.
 
Being angry at foids for alpha fuxx beta buxx is the same as being angry at your dog for licking his balls.

We are in a no-win situation. We are ugly and we'll never receive a woman's admiration.
 
Civilization can only exist as long as there is a slave class (what we now call the working/middle class). That class needs to accept and believe in society, and have faith that it is ultimately good.

A blackpilled society can't exist.
This is 100% truth. And when you're forced to wageslave WHILE knowking about it and about the blackpill, it just feels atrociously unbearable.

WE MUST come up with a guide to NEETdom or at least semi-NEETdom or gaining money through other means for wageslave cels. No incel deserves to be a working-class wageslave, if there's ONE THING we can and should do about our inceldom is dropping from society as much as possible. "OK, you don't want to be my friend and give me what I need, than you're also ostracized by me" - that's the only real weapon we have and it's way more effective than ERs tbh.
 
Being angry at foids for alpha fuxx beta buxx is the same as being angry at your dog for licking his balls.

We are in a no-win situation. We are ugly and we'll never receive a woman's admiration.
Cope, if your dog is misbehaving then you don't have to support him.
WE MUST come up with a guide to NEETdom or at least semi-NEETdom or gaining money through other means for wageslave cels. No incel deserves to be a working-class wageslave, if there's ONE THING we can and should do about our inceldom is dropping from society as much as possible. "OK, you don't want to be my friend and give me what I need, than you're also ostracized by me" - that's the only real weapon we have and it's way more effective than ERs tbh.
High iq. We need to stop being taken advantage of from the government cucks.
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
20
Views
536
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
The Scarlet Prince
Replies
13
Views
744
pedrolopezwasright
pedrolopezwasright

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top