Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

There is not blackpill.

Abyayala

Abyayala

Waiting for info.
-
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Posts
50
Request for Information
The black pill tells a thousand real facts, and I respect that, but it commits a BIG, BIG, HUGE unforgivable mistake.
1) It is true that many men are now being segregated by their biotype.
segregated by such things as jaw and chin type, height, and facial features. YES. It's true. (From now on we will call this: discrimination by biotype). But the black pill theory, (from now on called the biotypes theory), states that it happens due to BIOLOGICAL CAUSES. Women involuntarily seek some particular physical types by virtue of unavoidable biological and evolutionary reasons. Those who do not match that biotype are dead for sexual life. it would be better fot them to commit suicide because Nature has condemned them. It is their biological doom.
2) That is a BIG mistake, for not to say a lie. There are endless anthropological reserches that demonstrate that in every different culture throughout human history, women have preferred very different masculine biotypes contrary to the current canon that we have today, which some you Incels call «The Chad», and which is promoted by western media.
(I do not call it chad but the PMB , that is, the paradigm of current male beauty, PMB).
This paradigm has been promoted by DC Comics and the entertainment industry. The male with strong jaw and angular chin, squared face, ears in a straight line, height greater than a meter seventy five centimeters, etc. In several and different nations, women, led by different cultures have preferred small men, with short jaws, with round faces, with protruding ears, men with big teeth, etc. Otherwise humanity would not have biological variety and all males since the beginning of history would have been a boring copy of Clark Kent or The Rock. Like the elite described in the book «Brave New World».

3) The result would be the death of the species due to lack of genetic variety. The fact is this: crowded teeth, round faces, and short heights add genetic variety. It is biased to believe in the black pill. Natural Selection is not the cause of the problem.
The real reason of the current masculine beauty prototype is our culture. The culture created it in the USA and California since the 80s. It's the media and the entertainment industry that made that selection.
4) The indu-porn is the main problem.
5) In short, it is true, there is a sexual apartheid that discriminates millions of men. They are going to be left alone without inimacy because of their physical appearance or biotype. YES. We do not deny it.
But it is a big mistake to state dogmatically that this hideous discrimination is caused by any biological cause.
With all due respect, that is WRONG.

6) If tomorrow Western civilization ends by a nuclear war and India becomes the only society left standing, the "model of male beauty" will be an Indian male prototype, with crowded teeth, less than six feet, and dark skin. That will be the new "chad".

7) So do something ABOUT THIS, mobilize, denounce and fight back the culture that is nullifying you.
ONE WAY OR ANOTHER the hemegony of what you call the chad has expiration date. Just fight back.
This is not unavoidable. Throw away the black pill, it is scientist, it lacks anthropological and ethnographic knowledge.
I respect your insights, your incel theory will change the sociology of the next decades, you are telling the true, but you are wrong about the real cause of the problem, I must let you know your mistake.

With all due respect,

Thanks a lot.

Please look at the "chad" of the Zoe nation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5oxWayvyYI
 
Last edited:
1664016157380
 
The internet has ruined my attention span. I cannot even commit to reading this. Please forgive me.
don't worry my friend. The only thing you have to know is that this is not the end. The black pill does not exist. Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
The internet has ruined my attention span. I cannot even commit to reading this. Please forgive me.
I can read BPP's posts just fine, because he's coherent and clear. This post is not.
 
Otherwise humanity would not have biological variety and all men since the beginning of history woul be a boring copy of Clark Kent or The Rock. Like the elite described in the book «Brave New World». Please read it.
JFL. You think a son will always be a 100% copy of his father? Or that men don't have very different tastes in women/aren't ready to fuck almost any foid?
 
I agree with your theory, muh biology is flawed, first like you said not everyone had the same picture of the male beauty troughout the history, second average woman doesnt even wants kids anymore. They fight to have the unlimited options of abortions.

Media plays huge role in what is considered attractive and what is not. Just compare what was considered attractive 20-30 years ago and what is now.
 
hmm i think reasons why bad genes continue to live are not different tastes in men, but:
1) lack of standards in men, so genetically inferior women get to reproduce
2) forced monogamy that happened for centuries in many parts of the world

I think traits like strong masculine jaw, big height and hunter eyes are very universally attractive to almost all females.
Holywood and comics industry did not create this standard, they just used it to their advantage to create even more popular content.
You think that it is a belief, but with all due respect, antropology denies your belief. Please could you check this anthropological document?
In the Zoe nation the handsome men, the real hunters of the jungle have all the opposite features of what you guys call the chad. Round faces, short height, want more evidence?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5oxWayvyYI
 
Last edited:
I've read it now. From what I understood, are you putting forth the notion that incels/blackpillers argue that women are biologically attracted to certain phenotypes due to uncontrollable bio-evolutionary reasons, but in fact that is not the case, as throughout history we can observe different preferences in various communities outside of the standard "Chad" archetype - the expansive genetic variance we can observe today shows that women are not biologically attracted to a certain phenotype, and that undesirable men are now being culled mainly due to women's brainwashing through mediums like films and books? I'm not super invested in this side of the blackpill, but it is interesting to discuss nonetheless.
That is exactly what we say. Brainwash.
 
I agree with your theory, muh biology is flawed, first like you said not everyone had the same picture of the male beauty troughout the history, second average woman doesnt even wants kids anymore. They fight to have the unlimited options of abortions.

Media plays huge role in what is considered attractive and what is not. Just compare what was considered attractive 20-30 years ago and what is now.
exactly.
 
JFL. You think a son will always be a 100% copy of his father? Or that men don't have very different tastes in women/aren't ready to fuck almost any foid?
As a matter of fact, in some nations of melanesia all women of the community had sexual intercourses with all men doing a circle during the year. The goal of the culture was everyone to get sexual gratification. Women were not selective as they are in western society. Have you read anthropological studies of these nations?. With all due respect to your beliefs, No, women do not reject men for biological reasons but only for cultural indoctrination and I can prove it . Please research. Humanity has had almost unlimited sexual practices and preferences all over the world wich include a totally diffrent standard of masculine beauty. Your so called chad is creation of the last decades of the 20Th century.
For example, the Comanches, they were traditionally polyamorous, with both women and men free to take more than one spouse. in the end none was celibate. When a woman married a man she also married his brothers, they were round faced people with short chin, short height, small eyes. And they killed many british "chads" with their hands during the wars.
Please, do not reduce the whole humanity likes ans tastes to "strong chin an hunters eyes" that is reductionist, it is phantasy.


Look at what they call the chads in the amazon:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5oxWayvyYI
 
Last edited:
Do a tldr I can’t read it cause low iq
 
Guess we have to agree to disagree on this one :feelsaww:
 
The blackpill is law
 
Short men have always been hated, bullshit thread
 
i think this is a poorly written post & is incoherent in some parts. do you agree/disagree with my thoughts?

The black pill does not exist. Thanks a lot.
you claim blackpill does not exist, why don't you try and debunk one of the many claims on the scientific blackpill wiki page?

you also fail to acknowledge how female hypergamy has skyrocketed due to the globalisation of the sexual dating market with dating apps coupled with the sexual revolution & feminism. the liberation of females is something that's only happened in the last few decades or so. i believe these factors are the leading cause for the large inequality in dating we see today (80/20 distribution).

it's inaccurate to bring up third world countries like india & tribal societies and compare them with the situation that the majority of men are in today. it's simply a meaningless comparison. the privileges & access women have in these societies will undoubtedly mean that they will date uglier men. they will still date the best they can get in their pool of options, hypergamy still exists. also in such societies, arranged marriages & monogamies are commonplace, which explains why unattractive people keep reproducing.

5) In short, it is true, there is a sexual apartheid that discriminates millions of men. They are going to be left alone without inimacy because of their physical appearance or biotype. YES. We do not deny it.
But it is a big mistake to state dogmatically that this hideous discrimination is caused by any biological cause.
With all due respect, that is WRONG.
so you accept blackpill in the first two lines, then you deny blackpill in the last two lines. which is it? you contradict yourself.

7) So do something ABOUT THIS, mobilize, denounce and fight back the culture that is nullifying you.
ONE WAY OR ANOTHER the hemegony of what you call the chad has expiration date. Just fight back.
This is not unavoidable. Throw away the black pill, it is scientist, it lacks anthropological and ethnographic knowledge.
wtf advice is this? mobilize denounce fight back? are you fucking retarded? "just fight back" theory lol
yeah just throw away blackpill and you'll end up as another bluepill betabux soycuck. if anything, more men need to be blackpilled
 
Last edited:
The condensed version anyone ?
 
Stopped reading at "you incels" infiltrator told on himself :feelstastyman:
 
The black pill tells a thousand real facts, and I respect that, but it commits a BIG, BIG, HUGE unforgivable mistake.
1) It is true that many men are now being segregated by their biotype.
segregated by such things as jaw and chin type, height, and facial features. YES. It's true. (From now on we will call this: discrimination by biotype). But the black pill theory, (from now on called the biotypes theory), states that it happens due to BIOLOGICAL CAUSES. Women involuntarily seek some particular physical types by virtue of unavoidable biological and evolutionary reasons. Those who do not match that biotype are dead for sexual life. it would be better fot them to commit suicide because Nature has condemned them. It is their biological doom.
2) That is a BIG mistake, for not to say a lie. There are endless anthropological reserches that demonstrate that in every different culture throughout human history, women have preferred very different masculine biotypes contrary to the current canon that we have today, which some you Incels call «The Chad», and which is promoted by western media.
(I do not call it chad but the PMB , that is, the paradigm of current male beauty, PMB).
This paradigm has been promoted by DC Comics and the entertainment industry. The male with strong jaw and angular chin, squared face, ears in a straight line, height greater than a meter seventy five centimeters, etc. In several and different nations, women, led by different cultures have preferred small men, with short jaws, with round faces, with protruding ears, men with big teeth, etc. Otherwise humanity would not have biological variety and all males since the beginning of history would have been a boring copy of Clark Kent or The Rock. Like the elite described in the book «Brave New World».

3) The result would be the death of the species due to lack of genetic variety. The fact is this: crowded teeth, round faces, and short heights add genetic variety. It is biased to believe in the black pill. Natural Selection is not the cause of the problem.
The real reason of the current masculine beauty prototype is our culture. The culture created it in the USA and California since the 80s. It's the media and the entertainment industry that made that selection.
4) The indu-porn is the main problem.
5) In short, it is true, there is a sexual apartheid that discriminates millions of men. They are going to be left alone without inimacy because of their physical appearance or biotype. YES. We do not deny it.
But it is a big mistake to state dogmatically that this hideous discrimination is caused by any biological cause.
With all due respect, that is WRONG.

6) If tomorrow Western civilization ends by a nuclear war and India becomes the only society left standing, the "model of male beauty" will be an Indian male prototype, with crowded teeth, less than six feet, and dark skin. That will be the new "chad".

7) So do something ABOUT THIS, mobilize, denounce and fight back the culture that is nullifying you.
ONE WAY OR ANOTHER the hemegony of what you call the chad has expiration date. Just fight back.
This is not unavoidable. Throw away the black pill, it is scientist, it lacks anthropological and ethnographic knowledge.
I respect your insights, your incel theory will change the sociology of the next decades, you are telling the true, but you are wrong about the real cause of the problem, I must let you know your mistake.

With all due respect,

Thanks a lot.

Please look at the "chad" of the Zoe nation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5oxWayvyYI
This is not a repudiation of the blackpill

This is an investigation into the origin of the black pill and the lookism it is founded upon, and a repudiation of the muh natural selection that females offer as a reason for choosing chad EVERY SINGLE TIME NO MATTER WHAT THE CIRCUMSTANCE.

It has a lot of merit and i completely agree that the chad, is a myth propogated by the west i would say since the birth of HOLLYWOOD SEE JAMES DEAN FOR DETAILS AS CHAD IS PUSHED AS THE ONLY WAY A MAN SHOULD LOOK AND EVERYONE ELSE IS A SECONDARY CHARACTER.

You have also made a giga iq observation IT IS CHANGEABLE, CHANGE THE MEDIA AND THE NARRATIVE OF THE MEDIA AND CHANGE THE ARCHETYPE OF CHAD AND THE LEADING MAN, because the herd is so dumb they will follow what they are told to follow (by the media, hollywood , magazines etc).

People need to wake up to the facts you have spat out
 
So these are the "academic intellectual" investigating us? They're not sending their best :feelskek::feelskek: This faggot probably believes in the out of Africa theory as well :bluepill:
 
So blackpill isn't real because we could just change the beauty standard of the whole world :feelsseriously::feelsseriously:

yeah lmfao just like the sun isn't real because we could just blow it up
 
In several and different nations, women, led by different cultures have preferred small men, with short jaws, with round faces, with protruding ears, men with big teeth, etc.
Give proof. Which cultures in particular? I will research and see if you are right.
 
No one ever liked ugly deformed or mentally I'll people. In some less civilized parts of the world it's acceptable to murder children who are mentally and physically defective. It's even a duty.
Standards for looks are universal.

They don't look like uggos for me.

0189870bc113eb92167d714cbba3334b
 
Are you a journalist??
 
research my arse. Put a todays chad in your post apocaliptic India and see what happens
 
Based post thank god im telling seriously 99.999% of this forum are fucking idiots god be my witness
 
Possibly correct OP. The :blackpill: is mostly biological. But can be altered or manipulated to a small degree, by influential people who wield control over the media narratives and can encourage people to adjust their preferences a little bit differently (in video games). Hence shit like the apparently increasing interest for black men due to "BBC" in pornographic world, or the increasing interest for Koreans due to "Kpopmaxxing" on YT and IG.
 
Possibly correct OP. The :blackpill: is mostly biological. But can be altered or manipulated to a small degree, by influential people who wield control over the media narratives and can encourage people to adjust their preferences a little bit differently (in video games). Hence shit like the apparently increasing interest for black men due to "BBC" in pornographic world, or the increasing interest for Koreans due to "Kpopmaxxing" on YT and IG.
Exactly.
 
This is just repackaged bluepilled claims masquerading as "rebuttals" of the blackpill.
Kill yourself, you psued faggot.
 
Very sorry to feel your sadness and frustration. We do understand and also support your feelings. Feel free to spill your hate because you are justified. Yes, million of men are being sexually rejected due to their height, facial aspect, age, status and race. YES. a THOUSAND TIMES YES. And you are part of them. We have here men who were born in 1980 for example, while they have had only 5 or 6 sexual intercourse with ugly women all along their life whereas there are women born in 1999 who have had 300 sexual intercourse so far with the most beautiful women ever dreamed (many of them are part of the porn industry and others are not) . Women enjoying more sex with women then what men do! Women who were toddlers ten years ago whereas many men here were already Incels at that time and now those toddlers are women who have more sex with gorgeous women than what all this forum will ever had! Yes. A thousand times yes. it is an injustice! yes Tarquinius you must be really angry and we justify all kinds of actions you take to mend this aggravation. We understand your anger. Go ahead and show us your hate, we support it.
But you are wrong in one thing. NO, a thousand times NO. NO. Hello No. The reason for the Incels existence is NOT biological AND WE HAVE THE scientific EVIDENCE to support this rebuttal.
There is no black-pill ok? like it or not, there is no black fucking pill and you have to face the evidence.
Stop believing in it, the ONLY reason by virtue of which Incels exist is THE MODERN CULTURE. Period. We have hundreds of empirical pieces of evidence that can demonstrate that there is no biological reason. The only cause of this inhuman and aggravating sexual segregation is ideological. The porno-industry ideology is part of it. The racial segregation of the modern white civilization and the mass media is part of it. Stop blaming your DNA. Stop blaming EVOLUTION. Fight the culture, hate porn and if you can take violent action against it DO IT. But do not blame biology. The alpha male does not exist. 200 years ago in the territory of what is now called United States there were 500 nations, cherokees, Navajos, Comanches, Cheyennes. No one of their total male population did never ever suffered any kind of sexual discrimination INCELS did not exist at that time. If biology was the real reason Incels must have always existed and that is not the case.
The same wise happened in all civilizations of the planet. Greeks included. Hate me and hate our theory if you want , call us fagots, go ahead, WE UNDERSTAND YOUR RAGE, but you are using it towards the wrong target. Use your hate to fight the real enemy. Hate is a gift if you know how to use it.
Sorry to contradict the black pill that serves as a refugee to you, but we have scientific evidence: INCELS are a product of the western modern civilization you are product of MODERNITY. Jew Capitalism. Leave biology out of this.
We hope you do not consume porn because that is the creator of your condemnation. Porn made this to the incels. The real enemy is here in our society not in your fucking DNA. And one more thing: Celibate is an improper term, it is catholic and religious, the adequate term is Non voluntary sexual abstinence. or FORCED ABSTINENCE. NVSA or FORAB.
INCEL problem is pandemic, and it is a politic matter, maybe a military war could end this. Maybe you guys can start that war. Maybe the one who will start that war has not even born yet. Next 100 year will be decisive.
And I need someone who speaks Spanish because my English sucks I know. And Writing in this language is so impersonal.

Thanks a lot.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/20/the-geopolitics-of-sexual-frustration/
 
Last edited:
It is not your blame brother, my English sucks.
As a matter of fact all English in general sucks. It is a really poor impersonal language. Very primitive. Is there any possible way to have a forum in Spanish? does anyone speak Spanish here ? is it allowed?
 
Wtf you joined in 2018 and only have Posts34Online5h 57m
U hum. No time for this forum. We are busy making a scientific investigation at the University trying to prove that Incels are fundamentally right but there is no black pill therefore Incels are victims of cultural and economical oppression that creates sexual segregation. We are researchers and we are fighting for you on the academical field. 7 books written already.
 
This is not a repudiation of the blackpill

This is an investigation into the origin of the black pill and the lookism it is founded upon, and a repudiation of the muh natural selection that females offer as a reason for choosing chad EVERY SINGLE TIME NO MATTER WHAT THE CIRCUMSTANCE.

It has a lot of merit and i completely agree that the chad, is a myth propogated by the west i would say since the birth of HOLLYWOOD SEE JAMES DEAN FOR DETAILS AS CHAD IS PUSHED AS THE ONLY WAY A MAN SHOULD LOOK AND EVERYONE ELSE IS A SECONDARY CHARACTER.

You have also made a giga iq observation IT IS CHANGEABLE, CHANGE THE MEDIA AND THE NARRATIVE OF THE MEDIA AND CHANGE THE ARCHETYPE OF CHAD AND THE LEADING MAN, because the herd is so dumb they will follow what they are told to follow (by the media, hollywood , magazines etc).

People need to wake up to the facts you have spat out
Thanks for summarizing and supporting our thesis. Yes based on evidence we deny the biological basis of the Black Pill Ideology.
 
Last edited:
This is just repackaged bluepilled claims masquerading as "rebuttals" of the blackpill.
Kill yourself, you psued faggot.
This is not a repudiation of the blackpill

This is an investigation into the origin of the black pill and the lookism it is founded upon, and a repudiation of the muh natural selection that females offer as a reason for choosing chad EVERY SINGLE TIME NO MATTER WHAT THE CIRCUMSTANCE.

It has a lot of merit and i completely agree that the chad, is a myth propogated by the west i would say since the birth of HOLLYWOOD SEE JAMES DEAN FOR DETAILS AS CHAD IS PUSHED AS THE ONLY WAY A MAN SHOULD LOOK AND EVERYONE ELSE IS A SECONDARY CHARACTER.

You have also made a giga iq observation IT IS CHANGEABLE, CHANGE THE MEDIA AND THE NARRATIVE OF THE MEDIA AND CHANGE THE ARCHETYPE OF CHAD AND THE LEADING MAN, because the herd is so dumb they will follow what they are told to follow (by the media, hollywood , magazines etc).

People need to wake up to the facts you have spat out
 
No one ever liked ugly deformed or mentally I'll people. In some less civilized parts of the world it's acceptable to murder children who are mentally and physically defective. It's even a duty.
Standards for looks are universal.

They don't look like uggos for me.

View attachment 660476
No, we do not deny that every culture has standards for looks but we deny that those standards are always the same for every single culture. The guy of the picture belongs to one of the sudamerican nations and for example he does not have the squared chin that is the standard for the so called Chad of modern times. His height is less than 1 meter and 65. Culture creates the standard not biology. Extreme cases of deformity like absense of eyes are not ugliness but mutations. Even feaf people were considered attractive in ancient Egypt as well as epileptics.
 
Give proof. Which cultures in particular? I will research and see if you are right.
Please research the sexual preferences of the australoids, polynesians , melanesions, mongoloids, eskimos and over 2000 american indian nations before the european invasions. They all have short jaws, round faces and no squared chins. Absolutely none of those nations in the 19th century, NO ONE liked tall european looks at the first sight, women rejected europeans guys for being tall during the 1800's, it was ugly for them having strong chins and having dolichocephalic head, they prefered mongoloid round faced small men, with short jaws, with no Chad's features, with protruding ears, men with big teeth are typical from those nations and were considered handsome. Even during the Vietnam war women from the Vietcong rejected usanian soldiers for being tall and stayed with small vietnamese guys. Every single sexual preference is ideological. Margareth Mead in 1929 also gave proof of no hierarchy amongst short polynesians men, all of them received sexual contact with the same easyness in the community they wre 1,56cm in average. The current preference for tall men is created by hollywood. Even the british pilgrims were almost midgets when coming to New England they were small and feared the "ugly" taller indians. Tall indian nations like the patagons who were in average 1,92cm in argentina were percieved by europen women as ugly because of being tall. Chinese women during the Marco Polo journeys rejected the looks of the european guys for being too white and too tall. Wake up. Being tall is not per se attractive, culture made it attractive. Just brainwash.
Let me show you the very Chad of the Zoe Nation. Looks like Brad Pitt, don't you think?
Black pill biologicism is bullshit, women all around of the world have sexually prefered small men during thousand of years. The model of look and beauty we have now is a creation of the mass media and can be changed.

bra-zoe-fw-201-v2_940.jpg
 
Last edited:
i think this is a poorly written post & is incoherent in some parts. do you agree/disagree with my thoughts?


you claim blackpill does not exist, why don't you try and debunk one of the many claims on the scientific blackpill wiki page?

you also fail to acknowledge how female hypergamy has skyrocketed due to the globalisation of the sexual dating market with dating apps coupled with the sexual revolution & feminism. the liberation of females is something that's only happened in the last few decades or so. i believe these factors are the leading cause for the large inequality in dating we see today (80/20 distribution).

it's inaccurate to bring up third world countries like india & tribal societies and compare them with the situation that the majority of men are in today. it's simply a meaningless comparison. the privileges & access women have in these societies will undoubtedly mean that they will date uglier men. they will still date the best they can get in their pool of options, hypergamy still exists. also in such societies, arranged marriages & monogamies are commonplace, which explains why unattractive people keep reproducing.


so you accept blackpill in the first two lines, then you deny blackpill in the last two lines. which is it? you contradict yourself.


wtf advice is this? mobilize denounce fight back? are you fucking retarded? "just fight back" theory lol
yeah just throw away blackpill and you'll end up as another bluepill betabux soycuck. if anything, more men need to be blackpilled

Well, let me quote the summary of one of the members of the Forum, so you will understand that there is not contradiction in my thesis and that the samples taken from sexual preferences in women in ancient cultures are decisive to debunk and improve the biologicist Black Pill theory and transform it into a historical theory that offers the possibility of change, please read the statements below:


"This is not a repudiation of the blackpill

This is an investigation into the origin of the black pill and the lookism it is founded upon, and a repudiation of the muh natural selection that females offer as a reason for choosing chad EVERY SINGLE TIME NO MATTER WHAT THE CIRCUMSTANCE.

It has a lot of merit and i completely agree that the chad, is a myth propogated by the west i would say since the birth of HOLLYWOOD SEE JAMES DEAN FOR DETAILS AS CHAD IS PUSHED AS THE ONLY WAY A MAN SHOULD LOOK AND EVERYONE ELSE IS A SECONDARY CHARACTER.

You have also made a giga iq observation IT IS CHANGEABLE, CHANGE THE MEDIA AND THE NARRATIVE OF THE MEDIA AND CHANGE THE ARCHETYPE OF CHAD AND THE LEADING MAN, because the herd is so dumb they will follow what they are told to follow (by the media, hollywood , magazines etc).

People need to wake up to these facts".


So, yes, fight back!!!
 
Last edited:
Short men have always been hated, bullshit thread
No sir, that statement is wrong and I can prove it with empirical evidence. Short men were sexually prefered by far during thousands of years in many civlizations in several regions of the planet , for example, in wich today is Vietnam and Cambodia amongs other places. Research on sexual preferences for short men among australoids, polynesians , melanesions, mongoloids, muisca people, eskimos and over 2000 american indian nations before the european invasions. They all were short, compact men, they have or had short jaws, round faces and no squared chins, they did not look like any stupid Brad Pitt but they were the Chads of their tribe though. Absolutely none of those nations during the 19th century liked tall european looks at the first sight, women of those nations rejected europeans guys for being tall during the 1800's, it was ugly for them having strong chins and having dolichocephalic long heads, women of those nations prefered mongoloid round faced short men, with short jaws, with no Chad's features, with protruding ears, men with big teeth are typical from those nations and were considered very handsome. Even during the Vietnam war in recent times women from the Vietcong rejected usanian soldiers for being tall, yes, again: for being tall and stayed with small vietnamese guys. The sexual preference for tall men is a cultural recent creation of hollywood. Please get out of your mind the biologicism, this is not about evolution, this is a historical process created by the development of capitalism. he current preference for tall men is more related to Marx then Darwin. As historical phenomena we have the chance to make a change.
 
Infilthtraitor
 
No sir, Black Pill is a biologicist Theory not law, just a theory that can be debunked. The very basis of sexual rejection is not biological at all but merely cultural and historical performed within the process of capitalist production. Mass media is the responsible not the DNA.
 

Similar threads

FrenchSandNigger
Replies
4
Views
176
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
sociology blackpill
Replies
18
Views
445
themang
T
lonelysince2006
Replies
12
Views
241
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
sociology blackpill
Replies
5
Views
200
AngryUbermensch
AngryUbermensch

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top