Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Venting There is no such thing as a "true involuntary celibate"

goydivision

goydivision

jedem das seine
★★★★★
Joined
May 11, 2020
Posts
2,480
The definition of the term "involuntary celibate" differs widely from user to user, as does the term "ascension".

It looks kind of like this.

Does fucking a hooker count? No, that's escortcelling.

Does "unconsensual sex" count? No, knajjd is still a mod, so I'll assume he's still involuntary celibate.

Does doing it with someone you're married to count? @Personalityinkwell argues that it is escortcelling.

In addition to that, some argue that of you're a standardscel, your a volcel. But here's the thing. Aren't we all standardscels, to some extent? While some posters here would say that they would do it with a 300 pound deformed mentally retarded landwhale (a 1/10), I doubt they'd actually be willing to do it in real life. And if they are, they wouldn't be able to get it up.

All of this is just infuriating, and I think we should not be too strict on our interpretation of the term "involuntary celibate".

I propose we have a fixed definition: Any unattractive male (sub 6/10 overall) who has not have had sex, or who has had sex only with a hooker.

This way, we can clear up any misunderstandings about "fakecels" and "volcels".
 
This makes good sense.

but faggots on this forum won't agree, they like to gatekeep over stupid shit. the only real gatekeeping should be over if you are actually fucking non hookers for free
 
Virginity resets every 6 months according tp the rules of that forum.
 
This makes good sense.

but faggots on this forum won't agree, they like to gatekeep over stupid shit. the only real gatekeeping should be over if you are actually fucking non hookers for free
tbh. But didn’t you argue that betabuxxing isn’t ascension because it’s escortmaxxing?
 
Ascending, having sex and being happy are 3 different things
 
Ascending, having sex and being happy are 3 different things
care to elaborate the difference between the first two? The way I see it, ascension is sex that isn’t with a hooker.
 
care to elaborate the difference between the first two? The way I see it, ascension is sex that isn’t with a hooker.
Yes exactly that. You can fuck a hooker, be a betabuxx or have an arranged marriage, but I don't see that as an ascention since the woman is not upright attracted to you. Yet becomming a betabux still means to leave inceldom, but you did not ascend.
 
I propose we have a fixed definition: Any unattractive male (sub 6/10 overall) who has not have had sex
Nope, that is too lenient on the fakecels here. You have to be sub 4.5/10 to be considered an incel. NOT sub 6.
 
Nope, that is too lenient on the fakecels here. You have to be sub 4.5/10 to be considered an incel. NOT sub 6.
you need to fuck off with your stupid definitions. you act like a 4.5 dude gets pussy for just existing? have you ever heard of tinder and instagram?
 
you need to fuck off with your stupid definitions. you act like a 4.5 dude gets pussy for just existing? have you ever heard of tinder and instagram?
Yeah you are just another fakecel LARPing as subhuman when you're just average.
 
Yeah you are just another fakecel LARPing as subhuman when you're just average.
cope i have acne scars. the average dude doesn't have acne scars

answer my question, have you ever heard of tinder and instagram and snapchat?
 
cope i have acne scars. the average dude doesn't have acne scars

answer my question, have you ever heard of tinder and instagram and snapchat?
Of course I have heard of them. And well if you have acne scars then you are a 4/10 so why are you getting so defensive?
 
Of course I have heard of them. And well if you have acne scars then you are a 4/10 so why are you getting so defensive?
because i've been rated a 4.5 or even 5 by some

see, you say 10s don't exist. well do 0s exist?

if it's a scale of 1-9 then the average is 5.
 
because i've been rated a 4.5 or even 5 by some

see, you say 10s don't exist. well do 0s exist?

if it's a scale of 1-9 then the average is 5.
Nope, 5 is above average. So you have acne scars and you are still considered above average? Fakecel out!!
 
Nope, 5 is above average. So you have acne scars and you are still considered above average? Fakecel out!!
well, the people who rate me think "average" and then say 5/10

let me elaborate:

most peole think "5" is average

you think 4.5 is "average"

do you understand?
Yes exactly that. You can fuck a hooker, be a betabuxx or have an arranged marriage, but I don't see that as an ascention since the woman is not upright attracted to you. Yet becomming a betabux still means to leave inceldom, but you did not ascend.
disagree. if you betabuxx you're still an incel
 
well, the people who rate me think "average" and then say 5/10

let me elaborate:

most peole think "5" is average

you think 4.5 is "average"

do you understand?

disagree. if you betabuxx you're still an incel
You said "if the rating scale goes from 1 to 9 then 5 is average" and I was basing my answer off of that.
 
You said "if the rating scale goes from 1 to 9 then 5 is average" and I was basing my answer off of that.
whatever. i'm average AT best. realistically i'm below average because women are hypergaous as fuck and see you at your worst angle.

anyway, if the scale goes from 1 to 9, you do realize that the middle is 5? 1 + 9 = 10. 10/2=5
 
whatever. i'm average AT best. realistically i'm below average because women are hypergaous as fuck and see you at your worst angle.

anyway, if the scale goes from 1 to 9, you do realize that the middle is 5? 1 + 9 = 10. 10/2=5
If you are average then you fare much better than me. And no, 1s are reserved for deformed people, so 9/2 = 4.5 as the average.
 
If you are average then you fare much better than me. And no, 1s are reserved for deformed people, so 9/2 = 4.5 as the average.
i'm not average, i'm a little below, i'm only average in good lighting

but your rating system is still flawed. 1 to 9, the middle is 5. this is basic mathematics. it's not 0 to 9, it's 1 to 9
 
i'm not average, i'm a little below, i'm only average in good lighting

but your rating system is still flawed. 1 to 9, the middle is 5. this is basic mathematics. it's not 0 to 9, it's 1 to 9
Nope it's not flawed. If 5 is average in 1-10 because 10/2=5 then with 1-9 it's 9/2=4.5 so if you don't understand simple math then you're pretty low IQ.
 
Nope it's not flawed. If 5 is average in 1-10 because 10/2=5 then with 1-9 it's 9/2=4.5 so if you don't understand simple math then you're pretty low IQ.
you are still ignoring my point like a pussy

average=the middle

1 to 9, the middle is 5

address that point plz
 
you are still ignoring my point like a pussy

average=the middle

1 to 9, the middle is 5

address that point plz
You can't do basic math, there, I addressed your point. Now don't be low IQ. I am seeing you as a joke now.
 
You can't do basic math, there, I addressed your point. Now don't be low IQ. I am seeing you as a joke now.
what is the middle of 1 and 3?
 
I propose we have a fixed definition: Any unattractive male (sub 6/10 overall) who has not had sex, or who has had sex only with a hooker.
see this definition sounds ok on paper but I think that if women have done intimate/sexual activities with you (dating, hand holding, kissing etc) then you're at least "in the game" and able to compete with the rest of the male population. you're not totally condemned to involuntarily celibacy. and tbh I just don't feel comfortable around those people and can't relate to them at all
 
see this definition sounds ok on paper but I think that if women have done intimate/sexual activities with you (dating, hand holding, kissing etc) then you're at least "in the game" and able to compete with the rest of the male population. you're not totally condemned to involuntarily celibacy. and tbh I just don't feel comfortable around those people and can't relate to them at all
Fair and reasonable concern, personally I sort of disagree but I totally see your point
 

Similar threads

Grodd
Replies
5
Views
270
Acorn
Acorn
B33troot
Replies
10
Views
241
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
RealSchizo
Replies
11
Views
184
Runt171
Runt171
PunishedNEETcel
Replies
5
Views
84
IncelsNeverCry
IncelsNeverCry
anotherwastedlife
Replies
2
Views
62
anotherwastedlife
anotherwastedlife

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top