Deleted member 40785
/calm/
-
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2022
- Posts
- 877
@Made in Heaven is a delusional MENAcel who argues like an IT tranny, muh dating apps arent real life the sample size isnt big enough muh white women love middle eastern men
View: https://imgur.com/A50EPtl
94% of white women excluded middle eastern men and this low IQ sandnigger actually said that middle easterners were considered white when they clear diffrentiated between white european and MENA
Middle eastern women also rated whites as the most attractive. This was taken from a very large proportion of users, 79% of MIDDLE EASTERN women rated white men the most attractive.
Turkish and morrocon and surinamese had half the SMV of equivalent white man! White women want NOTHING to do with menas. The average height in iraq is 5'5, and iran is 5'8. The average swedish foid is taller then an iraqi man, and the average nordic man is 180 cm. This guy was coping so hard, he couldnt accept the fact that middle eastern women want european men and from extensive research found that middle eastern men were excluded by white women at 94% rate
Blacks, asians and latinos had a lower exclusion rate from white women then menas JFL. Menas also have lower IQs then whites, so ofc white women want genetically superior males but he cant accept that he thinks that white women really want inbred Low IQ niggas This nigga cherry picks betabuxx marriages between MENA males and white women, but thinks data saying most relationships are formed online is useless, apparently according to his low iq retard, a couple of pic of cherry picked marriages is more valuable then dating data that includes 10,000 + parcipitants, what a fucking brainlet White women want literally nothing to do with MENA men, latinos have higher smv but this guy is on ultra copium
According to data from the How Couples Meet and Stay Together survey (2017), a comprehensive national survey on romantic relationships in the US, 39% of couples met and started relationships online in 2017. The category "met online" includes online dating, but also social media and online games. At the same time, the categories "meeting through friends" or "at school" have declined, thus, meeting online has now become the leading way relationship to form. Online dating in particular is probably on a par with "Bars & Restaurants". The share of couples meeting online has almost doubled since 2009, and is currently exponentially increasing. Between 1995 to 2017, meeting through friends saw the largest decline, with 40% fewer people meeting this way. 23% of all couples met on online dating services, but the category is experiencing an exponential (logistical) increase.
This is likely the most transformative change that has occurred in the dating sphere in the past 20 years. The change coincides clearly with many of the other trends discussed on this page, such as the overall increase in male celibacy during this time frame and greater amount of sex being consolidated to the top 5-20% of men.
The only two methods of starting relationships that are on the rise are online dating and meeting in bars/restaurants, both of which favor the most physically attractive (and possibly physically dominant) men heavily and are generally oriented around "hook-up" type relationships and therefore offer minimal opportunities for demonstrating one's personal values and compatibility over time. All other methods of meeting partners are on the decline.
Froom the most popular online dating web site in 2004/2005 these were the racial preferences of the women on there.Yahoo Personals Dating Preferences Study sought to examine the dating preferences of online daters in four major metropolitan areas: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Atlanta. Internet daters' profiles of self-identified Asian, Black, Latino, and White men and women seeking opposite-sex dates were collected and coded from Yahoo Personals, which was the most popular national online dating web site in 2004 and 2005.
Women were considerably more likely than men to state they had a "racial preference". 74% of the 2735 women voiced a "racial preference", while 58% of the 2872 men voiced a "racial preference".
View: https://imgur.com/A50EPtl
94% of white women excluded middle eastern men and this low IQ sandnigger actually said that middle easterners were considered white when they clear diffrentiated between white european and MENA
Middle eastern women also rated whites as the most attractive. This was taken from a very large proportion of users, 79% of MIDDLE EASTERN women rated white men the most attractive.
- Kirkegaard EOW, Bjerrekær JD. 2016. The OKCupid dataset: A very large public dataset of dating site users. Open Differential Psychology. [FullText]
- Jelveh Z. 2009. Online Dating Mysteries Revealed. Sphere.
Turkish and morrocon and surinamese had half the SMV of equivalent white man! White women want NOTHING to do with menas. The average height in iraq is 5'5, and iran is 5'8. The average swedish foid is taller then an iraqi man, and the average nordic man is 180 cm. This guy was coping so hard, he couldnt accept the fact that middle eastern women want european men and from extensive research found that middle eastern men were excluded by white women at 94% rate
Blacks, asians and latinos had a lower exclusion rate from white women then menas JFL. Menas also have lower IQs then whites, so ofc white women want genetically superior males but he cant accept that he thinks that white women really want inbred Low IQ niggas This nigga cherry picks betabuxx marriages between MENA males and white women, but thinks data saying most relationships are formed online is useless, apparently according to his low iq retard, a couple of pic of cherry picked marriages is more valuable then dating data that includes 10,000 + parcipitants, what a fucking brainlet White women want literally nothing to do with MENA men, latinos have higher smv but this guy is on ultra copium