The hypothesis:
The capacity for real (self-less) love finds its origination in the Y chromosome and is not an inherent nature of women and the X chromosome at all and any capacity for (self-less) love by a woman is an inherited and transferred trait by the survival selection process experienced by males, particularly the Y chromosome.
This means that in the Y chromosome, love is hardcoded to exist, whereas for the X chromosome, it is rudimentary and vestigial at best.
Why?
Because women don't and never feel the same evolutionary pressure as males do in order to procreate. Better known as: Tutorial Mode (for women only).
I present the following fields in which this is true in my understanding and the following Legend to understand the perspectives.
Legend:
(Titel) (This icon indicates: The perspective field discussed)
> (This icon indicates; The general idea in which a phenomenon takes place)
= (This icon indicates; The presupposed resulting cause-effect relationship between the phenomenon and the field)
! (This icon indicates: The corresponding female behavior and/or the female equivalent of what women consider love in our society as a result of our different evolutionary pressures)
~ (This icon indicates: The (other) male possible realizations that can be further summarized from this knowledge)
(#1 Biological Validation)
> Males are forced to go through the whole personal meat grinder of survival of the fittest male in order to even be able to procreate and continue their legacy. Either get lucky genes, or betabux your way into survival.
= Men must provide value in either resources, accomplishments or genetic favor-ability in order to survive. For a woman she is successful if she gets pregnant. There is no pressure for a woman to succeed in other means, all she needs to do is sustain herself and manage the procreation of her own genetics (preferably) with chad.
! Women don't care about your personal life story, it does not benefit them unless it somehow relates to money, looks, power or something tangible that she can manipulate and use to her own advantage to further her genetic pool and accumulate material wealth. Your personal life story is only interesting if it means $$$ or genetics at the end for her. So men obtain validation (love for the self) from doing things for others while women obtain validation by possessing things from others. Thus the nature of women is not to do, but to obtain.
~ Men can be happy for what they do and who they are inherently. Men are thus inherently spiritual in contrast to the material nature of women.
(#2 Group Validation)
> We (Men) are expected to sacrifice our livelihoods (provide protection against natures nastiest creatures and events, war, risky jobs, etc) and our best interests in favor of the group for the ability to procreate and maintain society.
= Thus men only survive and get to procreate if they are willing to sacrifice their own existence for the group and other non directly blood related individuals. Females have no such pressure, they can sit back, relax drink a smoothie and watch a bunch of cucks die for them and procreate with who ever is left, preferably ethnic chad. The only time they will fight is to protect THEIR OWN children because it directly correlates to their own gene pool. Thus women do not have the same pressure to save other human beings from suffering as other men do.
! Women don't inherently care if you sacrifice yourself for them yet they expect you to do so anyway because vagina. They only care about their own progeny and are quite willing to see other human beings die if it benefits them or as long as it does not effect them negatively directly. This explains why 80%+ of women who marry or date soldiers cheat and treat their husbands like cucks especially if they are overseas and dying for their homeland. They honestly don't give a fuck about you doing ''good things'' for the group. Men only exist only within the group, females exist only from the perspective of being outside the group.
~ This explains why men will commit suicide much faster if they are socially isolated and do not produce enough validation. A woman can still simply get pregnant and she will find validation in taking care of her own genetic progeny. A man has no such option for he is not guaranteed to procreate. A man has no inherent self-existence value, it is only derived from his service to society and women. It also explains why sex is such an important thing for males because it directly correlates with their validation for existence.
(#2 Social Validation)
> Male cooperation and mutual validation is a necessity in tribal society and survival. Males need to support each other to guarantee good ties and a strong group identity that is lasting to survive in the harsh natural world.Female cooperation is a luxury in comparison because they do not gain anything from creating a strong group bond. Men fight nature yet thus women fight society.
= Men must have some inherent capacity to cooperate and care for each other in order to survive as a group in nature. Thus men have a loving bond for each other, especially old war buddies or when groups experience tribulations. For women this is not a necessity and every other woman in the group is actually a competitor in her goal to accumulate as much resources from the males in the group for her own genetic offspring. Thus men are inherently cooperative, but women are inherently competitive socially.
! While men are quite capable of working together and sacrificing personal grudges for the sake of the group, women will bitch about every little thing and kill each other socially over the smallest of things in order to gain a superior social standing. Men are inherently egalitarian and merit based because they recognize that they require the cooperation of every other male but females are inherently hierarchical because they believe they need to eek out a personal advantage in the social circle against other women and males. This has the nasty side effect that women are actually the origin of the aristocratic nobility and most resource based wars. They are the ones passively encouraging other males to kill more males so they can accumulate the wealth that is gained and goad them with the reward of hot dripping pussy. I call this the ''Princess Syndrome'' for women or the ''Blood-Prince Effect'' for males, for a woman is quit willing to marry and procreate with a mass murderer if that makes sure she and her children get all the resources produced by other males in order to further her own gene-pool even if it is at the expense of other human beings (males and females alike) and society in general.
~ Men are quite capable of working together and sacrificing personal grudges for the sake of the group but women are actively sowing discontent and malice in order to benefit personally. Perhaps many of you will remember in your younger years during your school or your work career how important it was for you or other men to ''show off'' how cool they were by dissing and being cruel to other males in front of the women in order to gain status and popularity so they could hopefully get the attention of the girl and prove that you as a male are of higher quality than others? Yes that is the rudimentary Blood Prince genes taking its toll on your conscience. Being cruel to other men is beneficial for women and it works in tangent with the Princess Syndrome of women.
Especially this last perspective made me realize that women actively undermine society by promoting the behavior of asocial men who kill other men in favor of their ego. They are actively procreating and promoting the most vile and antisocial behavior in favor of their own egotistical satisfaction. This perfectly explains why women get the hots for men who are in prison for murder. Women love murderers because she knows he is willing to kill other men and humans in order to further her progeny and accumulate resources for her at the expense of other human beings.
As you can see from this hypothesis. Females have very little incentive to actually truly love another human being. Any genetic inference of self-less love is entirely a side-effect from males rubbing off the selection pressure of survival in the X chromosome that they inherited from their mother. Thus good self-less men ''might'' produce ''good'' women but it is not guaranteed. While bad women have nothing to gain from producing ''good women'' to begin with. Thus the inference of good behavior is entirely responsible and sourced from the actions of the Y chromosome having an effect on the X chromosome.
ULTIMATE THEORY:
This explains why men ''dream'' about ''good and loving women'' because these are the very traits that we men are selected for in nature and the very traits that we select other men for to befriend and to further society and humanity with. Women have no such ''dreams'', other than chad and $$$.
Thus ultimately, a man ''dreams'' of what the best man could be if they were a woman.
Women ''dream'' about what ''the worst'' of their ego's could get away with in society while still getting praised for it.
Alright that's all I got for now. I'm sure there are other fields I have not yet discussed or gone into proper depth with but for nowI am quite willing to hear the input of other posters here on this board.
Blindcell Out!
Peace
TL : DR:
Evolution makes women inherently evil and forces males to be good little cucks. bla bla bla
[EDIT] Corrected some grammar/spelling mistakes.
The capacity for real (self-less) love finds its origination in the Y chromosome and is not an inherent nature of women and the X chromosome at all and any capacity for (self-less) love by a woman is an inherited and transferred trait by the survival selection process experienced by males, particularly the Y chromosome.
This means that in the Y chromosome, love is hardcoded to exist, whereas for the X chromosome, it is rudimentary and vestigial at best.
Why?
Because women don't and never feel the same evolutionary pressure as males do in order to procreate. Better known as: Tutorial Mode (for women only).
I present the following fields in which this is true in my understanding and the following Legend to understand the perspectives.
Legend:
(Titel) (This icon indicates: The perspective field discussed)
> (This icon indicates; The general idea in which a phenomenon takes place)
= (This icon indicates; The presupposed resulting cause-effect relationship between the phenomenon and the field)
! (This icon indicates: The corresponding female behavior and/or the female equivalent of what women consider love in our society as a result of our different evolutionary pressures)
~ (This icon indicates: The (other) male possible realizations that can be further summarized from this knowledge)
(#1 Biological Validation)
> Males are forced to go through the whole personal meat grinder of survival of the fittest male in order to even be able to procreate and continue their legacy. Either get lucky genes, or betabux your way into survival.
= Men must provide value in either resources, accomplishments or genetic favor-ability in order to survive. For a woman she is successful if she gets pregnant. There is no pressure for a woman to succeed in other means, all she needs to do is sustain herself and manage the procreation of her own genetics (preferably) with chad.
! Women don't care about your personal life story, it does not benefit them unless it somehow relates to money, looks, power or something tangible that she can manipulate and use to her own advantage to further her genetic pool and accumulate material wealth. Your personal life story is only interesting if it means $$$ or genetics at the end for her. So men obtain validation (love for the self) from doing things for others while women obtain validation by possessing things from others. Thus the nature of women is not to do, but to obtain.
~ Men can be happy for what they do and who they are inherently. Men are thus inherently spiritual in contrast to the material nature of women.
(#2 Group Validation)
> We (Men) are expected to sacrifice our livelihoods (provide protection against natures nastiest creatures and events, war, risky jobs, etc) and our best interests in favor of the group for the ability to procreate and maintain society.
= Thus men only survive and get to procreate if they are willing to sacrifice their own existence for the group and other non directly blood related individuals. Females have no such pressure, they can sit back, relax drink a smoothie and watch a bunch of cucks die for them and procreate with who ever is left, preferably ethnic chad. The only time they will fight is to protect THEIR OWN children because it directly correlates to their own gene pool. Thus women do not have the same pressure to save other human beings from suffering as other men do.
! Women don't inherently care if you sacrifice yourself for them yet they expect you to do so anyway because vagina. They only care about their own progeny and are quite willing to see other human beings die if it benefits them or as long as it does not effect them negatively directly. This explains why 80%+ of women who marry or date soldiers cheat and treat their husbands like cucks especially if they are overseas and dying for their homeland. They honestly don't give a fuck about you doing ''good things'' for the group. Men only exist only within the group, females exist only from the perspective of being outside the group.
~ This explains why men will commit suicide much faster if they are socially isolated and do not produce enough validation. A woman can still simply get pregnant and she will find validation in taking care of her own genetic progeny. A man has no such option for he is not guaranteed to procreate. A man has no inherent self-existence value, it is only derived from his service to society and women. It also explains why sex is such an important thing for males because it directly correlates with their validation for existence.
(#2 Social Validation)
> Male cooperation and mutual validation is a necessity in tribal society and survival. Males need to support each other to guarantee good ties and a strong group identity that is lasting to survive in the harsh natural world.Female cooperation is a luxury in comparison because they do not gain anything from creating a strong group bond. Men fight nature yet thus women fight society.
= Men must have some inherent capacity to cooperate and care for each other in order to survive as a group in nature. Thus men have a loving bond for each other, especially old war buddies or when groups experience tribulations. For women this is not a necessity and every other woman in the group is actually a competitor in her goal to accumulate as much resources from the males in the group for her own genetic offspring. Thus men are inherently cooperative, but women are inherently competitive socially.
! While men are quite capable of working together and sacrificing personal grudges for the sake of the group, women will bitch about every little thing and kill each other socially over the smallest of things in order to gain a superior social standing. Men are inherently egalitarian and merit based because they recognize that they require the cooperation of every other male but females are inherently hierarchical because they believe they need to eek out a personal advantage in the social circle against other women and males. This has the nasty side effect that women are actually the origin of the aristocratic nobility and most resource based wars. They are the ones passively encouraging other males to kill more males so they can accumulate the wealth that is gained and goad them with the reward of hot dripping pussy. I call this the ''Princess Syndrome'' for women or the ''Blood-Prince Effect'' for males, for a woman is quit willing to marry and procreate with a mass murderer if that makes sure she and her children get all the resources produced by other males in order to further her own gene-pool even if it is at the expense of other human beings (males and females alike) and society in general.
~ Men are quite capable of working together and sacrificing personal grudges for the sake of the group but women are actively sowing discontent and malice in order to benefit personally. Perhaps many of you will remember in your younger years during your school or your work career how important it was for you or other men to ''show off'' how cool they were by dissing and being cruel to other males in front of the women in order to gain status and popularity so they could hopefully get the attention of the girl and prove that you as a male are of higher quality than others? Yes that is the rudimentary Blood Prince genes taking its toll on your conscience. Being cruel to other men is beneficial for women and it works in tangent with the Princess Syndrome of women.
Especially this last perspective made me realize that women actively undermine society by promoting the behavior of asocial men who kill other men in favor of their ego. They are actively procreating and promoting the most vile and antisocial behavior in favor of their own egotistical satisfaction. This perfectly explains why women get the hots for men who are in prison for murder. Women love murderers because she knows he is willing to kill other men and humans in order to further her progeny and accumulate resources for her at the expense of other human beings.
As you can see from this hypothesis. Females have very little incentive to actually truly love another human being. Any genetic inference of self-less love is entirely a side-effect from males rubbing off the selection pressure of survival in the X chromosome that they inherited from their mother. Thus good self-less men ''might'' produce ''good'' women but it is not guaranteed. While bad women have nothing to gain from producing ''good women'' to begin with. Thus the inference of good behavior is entirely responsible and sourced from the actions of the Y chromosome having an effect on the X chromosome.
ULTIMATE THEORY:
This explains why men ''dream'' about ''good and loving women'' because these are the very traits that we men are selected for in nature and the very traits that we select other men for to befriend and to further society and humanity with. Women have no such ''dreams'', other than chad and $$$.
Thus ultimately, a man ''dreams'' of what the best man could be if they were a woman.
Women ''dream'' about what ''the worst'' of their ego's could get away with in society while still getting praised for it.
Alright that's all I got for now. I'm sure there are other fields I have not yet discussed or gone into proper depth with but for nowI am quite willing to hear the input of other posters here on this board.
Blindcell Out!
Peace
TL : DR:
Evolution makes women inherently evil and forces males to be good little cucks. bla bla bla
[EDIT] Corrected some grammar/spelling mistakes.
Last edited:
