Theory Theory on why women are natural sociopaths

[Stupid Clown]

In nature if all men were as narcissist and self centered as women society would never have been created. Men would've been too jealous and bitter to even cooperate with each other. Men have adapted an inner sense of morality and selflessness because it increases the survival of the human species through creations of society. Women on the other hand have evolved to do two things. Find a mate with the best genes possible, and carrying attractive children. Because of this they do not have the same sense of morality. They don't view the average man as a human, much less a tool to use. For the woman she only truly cares about attractive men and children (as long as they're not ugly.)

 

[NirvanaFan1988]

 

[EnglishCel]

Sounds about right.

 

[Emba]

View attachment 977356

Confirmed

 

[CantEscapeYourFate]

Those things shouldn't have rights

 

[BornToLose]

Sounds about right.

 

[Stupid Clown]

I think men are more prone to envy and bitterness than women. Men are naturally competitive and diverse while women are bound together by innate sentiments of motherhood and sisterhood (etc).





It depends on the man.


Even the ugly might be coddled by their mothers.

You generalize everything as if everything is confined to some latent, immutable essence that determines the character and existence of all things.

Sisterhood is a myth. Women are far more envious than men.

 

[SubZER0]

disgusting gender tbh

 

[Stupid Clown]

Women get along fairly well. Two women could resent each other and still behave like lifelong friends. All animosity and envy are usually suppressed. Women quarrel indirectly and furtively, only the keen eye can see it.

You don't understand women if you think they get along well. They're constantly plotting against each other.

 

[coping_manlet]

In nature if all men were as narcissist and self centered as women society would never have been created. Men would've been too jealous and bitter to even cooperate with each other. Men have adapted an inner sense of morality and selflessness because it increases the survival of the human species through creations of society. Women on the other hand have evolved to do two things. Find a mate with the best genes possible, and carrying attractive children. Because of this they do not have the same sense of morality. They don't view the average man as a human, much less a tool to use. For the woman she only truly cares about attractive men and children (as long as they're not ugly.)

The social cooperativeness of humans and other great apes is only apparent in males since they are the only ones actually accomplishing any real world tasks.

The males of any primate species are always the ones hunting, foraging, warding off predators, preparing nesting/bedding/shelter, and crafting tools to use. And typically these tasks could be accomplished much easier in groups, so the social male apes completed work more easily, survived longer more frequently, and thus took over the gene pool.

On the other hand, female primates literally have never offered anything significant to survival of their own species, and just sit around getting raped, giving birth, and raising babies.
These are not social activities. Nor do these activities become easier when working in groups.

For millions upon millions of years foids evolved to just sit sedentary on a jungle floor, waiting to either be raped, give birth, or breastfeed a baby.

 

[Balding Subhuman]

They can't care about men because it would be an evolutionary disadvantage for them. Men are so much likely to die at younger age. Its the female imperative to move from one man to the next if the last one dies.

They truly can't love men. They're not equipped for it.

 

[Stupid Clown]

The social cooperativeness of humans and other great apes is only apparent in males since they are the only ones actually accomplishing any real world tasks.

The males of any primate species are always the ones hunting, foraging, warding off predators, preparing nesting/bedding/shelter, and crafting tools to use. And typically these tasks could be accomplished much easier in groups, so the social male apes completed work more easily, survived longer more frequently, and thus took over the gene pool.

On the other hand, female primates literally have never offered anything significant to survival of their own species, and just sit around getting raped, giving birth, and raising babies.
These are not social activities. Nor do these activities become easier when working in groups.

For millions upon millions of years foids evolved to just sit sedentary on a jungle floor, waiting to either be raped, give birth, or breastfeed a baby.

You put it better than I did. You should make this its own Individual post.

 

[Stupid Clown]

They can't care about men because it would be an evolutionary disadvantage for them. Men are so much likely to die at younger age. Its the female imperative to move from one man to the next if the last one dies.

They truly can't love men. They're not equipped for it.

That's true. They're just machines for reproduction.

 

[faded]

They can't care about men because it would be an evolutionary disadvantage for them. Men are so much likely to die at younger age. Its the female imperative to move from one man to the next if the last one dies.

They truly can't love men. They're not equipped for it.

 

[Darkday]

In nature if all men were as narcissist and self centered as women society would never have been created. Men would've been too jealous and bitter to even cooperate with each other. Men have adapted an inner sense of morality and selflessness because it increases the survival of the human species through creations of society. Women on the other hand have evolved to do two things. Find a mate with the best genes possible, and carrying attractive children. Because of this they do not have the same sense of morality. They don't view the average man as a human, much less a tool to use. For the woman she only truly cares about attractive men and children (as long as they're not ugly.)

Love and morality are men traits. If there is evil in the world, it's thanks to foids. Evil men should have died out long ago, but foids kept compensating bad behavior and sociopathic traits.

 

[Norville Wood]

In nature if all men were as narcissist and self centered as women society would never have been created. Men would've been too jealous and bitter to even cooperate with each other. Men have adapted an inner sense of morality and selflessness because it increases the survival of the human species through creations of society. Women on the other hand have evolved to do two things. Find a mate with the best genes possible, and carrying attractive children. Because of this they do not have the same sense of morality. They don't view the average man as a human, much less a tool to use. For the woman she only truly cares about attractive men and children (as long as they're not ugly.)

Generally, I've noticed, women can justify any behavior in the pursuit of male procreation.

And two, they never feel guilty over dumping people in that pursuit.

 

[bus27jihad]

Because women never need to be in the wild and because they were always protected by husbands and soyciety they never knew what the real world is like.

 

[Fifita]

Foids represent the worse of animal nature. Animals hunt to feed . Foids don't need to hunt they are just spiteful .

 

[Stupid Clown]

Foids represent the worse of animal nature. Animals hunt to feed . Foids don't need to hunt they are just spiteful .

 

[Stupid Clown]

Because women never need to be in the wild and because they were always protected by husbands and soyciety they never knew what the real world is like.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Generally, I've noticed, women can justify any behavior in the pursuit of male procreation.

And two, they never feel guilty over dumping people in that pursuit.

They're robots.