Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious [Theorem] It is in the interests of autistic celibates to be inclined towards over-sexualization; prudishness is neurotypical mendacity

Atavistic Autist

Atavistic Autist

Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
9,556
I was reading le Reddit, and came across this commenterino about explicit sex culture:

1590069144147


It is clearly written from a neurotypical perspective, which places high emphasis on the merits of manipulation and mendacity as they concern socio-sexual relationships, rather than honesty and consistency.

And it is all the more mendacious for the fact that the neurotypicals who have this view aren't actually interested in restricting sexuality, but just playing mind games where they can turn each other on through a sort of neurotic eroticism, in which teasing and the "sight of an ankle" excites them and releases a stream of dopamine in their brains.

Perhaps the more sexual experiences you have, the less sex itself excites you, and the more the "romantic" lead-up to sex excites you, in line with the mechanisms of dopamine generally:

When you become more certain, your brain uses dopamine differently. Instead of firing when you eat food or spot danger, for example, dopamine fires in anticipation of those events. Dopamine is far from a “pleasure molecule” as it has been characterized by popular literature. Once a behavior is learned, it has been most consistently associated with cravings and urges to act.
 
Last edited:
This is exaclty why I don't browse reddit no more nowadays
 
Tfw your brain never got to know the feeling of dopamine in the first place. :feelsbadman:
 
Reddit is cringe. Anyone who would have a legitimate reason for wanting women to be modest and men to have self control would be permabanned for being a sex negative sexist white supremacist.
 
No. We need to ban non-marital sex. This will (one) force an even distribution of love to everyone except volcels, (two) protect girls from harm (make fornication statutory and send chad to jail), and (three) increase human intellect, accomplishment, and charity towards one's fellows.
 
He isnt being prude but disgusted at a degenerate whore and her disgusting behavior.
 
This is some fucked up shit and the r*dditor is correct here ngl.
 
This is some fucked up shit and the r*dditor is correct here ngl.
The Redditor's argument against sex positivism echoes the complaints of giga homosexual degenerates against gay rights:

"What makes sodomy so titillating is precisely the stigma surrounding it, and if homosexuality is to be socially accepted, then it will lose much of its allure."

This is a perspective that nobody here can possibly sympathize with, given that it is fundamentally perverted and makes sexual restrictionism into a neurotic fetish, rather than taking it seriously.

Much more sympathetic is the autistic desire, reflected among autistic sodomites, to both "stand out and yet fit in." Although they are no less misguided, I can respect ritualizing, autistic profligates over the more neurotic types who get off on implicit rather than explicit corruptions and paraphilias, because the former are, at least, honest, whereas the latter are mendacious.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

AshamedVirgin34
Replies
48
Views
1K
erenyeager
erenyeager
Stupid Clown
Replies
39
Views
614
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
Nordicel94
Replies
13
Views
279
ItsOver4cel
ItsOver4cel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top