Atavistic Autist
Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Posts
- 9,556
Inceldom is not some label that you choose to adopt willingly. This nonsense is precisely what cucktears believes: "you can be a virgin but not an inkel, sweaty!"
Inceldom is a visible affliction that can be identified in a person -- a person like Patrick Crusius! He was ugly, and thus an incel. Normalfags intuitively know it, and so do we, just by looking at his picture (below) and contextualizing his actions based upon the social deprivation he must have experienced in life due to his ugliness.
It doesn't matter how he defined himself personally, because he was deluded. He had not achieved enlightenment through the Blackpill -- an objective analysis of his oppression -- but instead funneled his feelings of disaffection through ideological White Nationalist coping. Can he really be blamed for this, though?
We should welcome the fact that society is becoming increasingly aware of low-status men as agents of radicalization, whether they self-define as incels or attach themselves to subjective ideological movements which don't really care about them.
Inceldom is a visible affliction that can be identified in a person -- a person like Patrick Crusius! He was ugly, and thus an incel. Normalfags intuitively know it, and so do we, just by looking at his picture (below) and contextualizing his actions based upon the social deprivation he must have experienced in life due to his ugliness.
It doesn't matter how he defined himself personally, because he was deluded. He had not achieved enlightenment through the Blackpill -- an objective analysis of his oppression -- but instead funneled his feelings of disaffection through ideological White Nationalist coping. Can he really be blamed for this, though?
We should welcome the fact that society is becoming increasingly aware of low-status men as agents of radicalization, whether they self-define as incels or attach themselves to subjective ideological movements which don't really care about them.
But it also serves our purposes to maximize our feelings of being oppressed, and claiming that we are falsely blamed for events such as these has utility in this respect. In one sense, this is absolutely correct, in that we are not even a movement, but a spontaneous collection of individuals, and so to blame us for violence is akin to what antifa says about blaming it for violence: that you cannot blame a spontaneous collection of individuals for violence, you can only blame the aggravating forces which lead to it forming for violence (in antifa's case, Nazis and fascists; in our case, Chads, roasties, normalfags, etc.)
Last edited: