lifefuel
Anti-White Propagandist
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Posts
- 9,607
The wall is not so much about foid physical desirability over the years. Obviously foids become less attractive with age, but any hole at any age will be have access to countless men. The wall is more about the mental changes in the hole and the changes in options that these holes will likely see. Femoids peak sexually around 16-21 and they never stop depreciating.
This is why /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen is a thing; and AFBB and the carousel and apex fallacy.
A female's best chances at the highest Chad she can get peaks at the same time her sexual desirability peaks. Of course there are always outliers but this generally seems to be the case. Even the Chads that get saddled up with a depreciating hole often end up cheating (because younger women are available), or the hole herself yearns to get back on the carousel. Despite the objective fact that her value has gone down, she often thinks it's actually gone UP over the years, because "muh college" degree and other feminist lies. So she questions why she's not having as much fun as when she was 20 if she's so much more mature and a better person. It's ironic really. The very things that made her "better" and allowed her to develop slightly are the same things that have stifled the young princess lifestyle that so many women have when young.
Most men don't matter to women, so her "best years" are the years where she has the most and best access to Chads. A true Chad a long the lines of Leo Dicaprio is either taken already or will almost certainly opt for a fresher hole, easily. Women are also spoiled bitches, so anything less than this is utterly devastating to them. If she ends up with a 7/10 BB when she was fucking 9s and 10s in college, it's crippling depression. It fucks with the hole's ego bigtime.
This is why forced virginal monogamy from young in a non-jewed degenerate culture is the only hope for "real" love.
This is why /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen is a thing; and AFBB and the carousel and apex fallacy.
A female's best chances at the highest Chad she can get peaks at the same time her sexual desirability peaks. Of course there are always outliers but this generally seems to be the case. Even the Chads that get saddled up with a depreciating hole often end up cheating (because younger women are available), or the hole herself yearns to get back on the carousel. Despite the objective fact that her value has gone down, she often thinks it's actually gone UP over the years, because "muh college" degree and other feminist lies. So she questions why she's not having as much fun as when she was 20 if she's so much more mature and a better person. It's ironic really. The very things that made her "better" and allowed her to develop slightly are the same things that have stifled the young princess lifestyle that so many women have when young.
Most men don't matter to women, so her "best years" are the years where she has the most and best access to Chads. A true Chad a long the lines of Leo Dicaprio is either taken already or will almost certainly opt for a fresher hole, easily. Women are also spoiled bitches, so anything less than this is utterly devastating to them. If she ends up with a 7/10 BB when she was fucking 9s and 10s in college, it's crippling depression. It fucks with the hole's ego bigtime.
This is why forced virginal monogamy from young in a non-jewed degenerate culture is the only hope for "real" love.
Last edited: