Often, a lot of females say that it would be better to seek a woman with sexual experience rather than a virgin, because you'd have to teach a virgin how to have sex (which makes no sense, considering women literally just have to lay on their backs, bend over, or just move their hips), but they never stop to consider the possibility of the man being a virgin. In my opinion, this notion of it being a chore to teach sex to a virgin is just projection of the way they view virgin males and the task of having sex with them. Most women look for men with prior sexual experience, however, if you have no sexual experience, a woman is much less likely to want to sleep with you due to you apparently being undesirable to other women, thus making it harder to gain any sexual experience, thus making it EVEN LESS likely for a woman to sleep with you (etc and so on..) This is multiplied year after year if you are still a virgin past the average ages of initial sexual exploration (16, 17, 18, 19). Past these ages, unless you are legitimately an 8 or above, your chances of finding a willing female to have sex with are probably 5% at most, if even that. I have no driver's license and do not live near any prostitutes, which i imagine is the same for many other incels. This means there is quite literally little to no chance at all of me ever having sex, which is something i've come to accept. I just find it strange that for all the criticisms the psychopaths on incel tears enjoy hurling our way, this fact seems to conveniently escape them.
