Serious The true meaning of liberalism: The expanded battle zone

[Lebensmüder]

They genuinely hate you when you don't dedicate your life to the rat's race that is the competition in the liberal so(y)ciety. If you watch TV or just LDAR after work without breaking your body in the gym or acquiring new skills like languages/programming/etc. they hate you, they see you as the worthless detritus of so(y)ciety unworthy of having relationships or even basal human rights - look at their disdain for NEETs, "uneducated" workers, people that cannot work due to mental/physical problems or those who see no sense in it due to the improvements of life quality associated with working nowadays being too small. They unironically seem to want an Aktion T4 (=euthanasia in the 3rd Reich) for those that they deem as "lazy parasites"/dregs of society (as long as they don't belong to the groups they deem as worth protecting like certain sexual/ethnic minorities and women because then suddenly the inexcusable becomes excusable and failure is acceptable).

Unironically: Liberalism (in its modern form) is nothing more than applied social darwinism (with lenience for some groups) - but on the level of the individual (and not on the level of groups like nations/races/religions/etc. which they would deem as archaic), prior to this humans had a group identity (like a nation/ideology/religion/etc.) and competed mostly in a group-speficic manner (to enable the victory of their social ideas/nations and the higher goals associated with it), as long as you belonged to the in-group you had some lenience and a certain worth automatically, but nowadays we have the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life due to social disintegration and the lack of group identities/higher goals, people nowadays live like rats and eat each other with no form of social cohesion and all people openly being natural enemies (but as long as it isn't on a group level it's fine in the eyes of liberalism) - the human is worthless nowadays (unless he belongs to the physical/mental/financial A-class as an extraordinary specimen).

If you said anything they literally say to individuals with lacking capabilities to a group that is on average not as capable as other groups (like blacks in the USA due to IQ or women everywhere due to physical strength) they would accuse you of being a monster, but on the individual level everything should be allowed due to total darwinism on the individual scale.
This modern/open/welcoming so(y)ciety is the coldest and most inhumane so(y)ciety with nothing more than battles/fights for the most basal things in life, look at how they talk about people and then you realize that there is absolutely no difference between the social views of a stereotypical Hollywood movie Nazi/Social Darwinist and a liberal - only that one person uses group-based criteria and the other wants the same fight for existence, but on the level of the individual. Then you can suddenly remove everyone you deem as unfit (e.g. everyone that is average or even below average in mental and physical terms) with no moral conflict. Liberalism meant nothing more than the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life - thanks to it we have no war among nations/ideas, but rather the total war among individuals.

@IslaVista2014, @Mentally lost cel, @your personality, @MarquisDeSade

 

[Deleted member 27204]

They genuinely hate you when you don't dedicate your life to the rat's race that is the competition in the liberal so(y)ciety. If you watch TV or just LDAR after work without breaking your body in the gym or acquiring new skills like languages/programming/etc. they hate you, they see you as the worthless detritus of so(y)ciety unworthy of having relationships or even basal human rights - look at their disdain for NEETs, "uneducated" workers, people that cannot work due to mental/physical problems or those who see no sense in it due to the improvements of life quality associated with working nowadays being too small. They unironically seem to want an Aktion T4 (=euthanasia in the 3rd Reich) for those that they deem as "lazy parasites"/dregs of society (as long as they don't belong to the groups they deem as worth protecting like certain sexual/ethnic minorities and women because then suddenly the inexcusable becomes excusable and failure is acceptable).

Unironically: Liberalism (in its modern form) is nothing more than applied social darwinism (with lenience for some groups) - but on the level of the individual (and not on the level of groups like nations/races/religions/etc. which they would deem as archaic), prior to this humans had a group identity (like a nation/ideology/religion/etc.) and competed mostly in a group-speficic manner (to enable the victory of their social ideas/nations and the higher goals associated with it), as long as you belonged to the in-group you had some lenience and a certain worth automatically, but nowadays we have the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life due to social disintegration and the lack of group identities/higher goals, people nowadays live like rats and eat each other with no form of social cohesion and all people openly being natural enemies (but as long as it isn't on a group level it's fine in the eyes of liberalism) - the human is worthless nowadays (unless he belongs to the physical/mental/financial A-class).

If you said anything they literally say to individuals with lacking capabilities to a group that is on average not as capable as other groups (like blacks in the USA due to IQ or women everywhere due to physical strength) they would accuse you of being a monster, but on the individual level everything should be allowed due to total darwinism on the individual scale.
This modern/open/welcoming so(y)ciety is the coldest and most inhumane so(y)ciety with nothing more than battles/fights for the most basal things in life, look at how they talk about people and then you realize that there is absolutely no difference between the social views of a stereotypical Hollywood movie Nazi/Social Darwinist and a liberal - only that one person uses group-based criteria and the other wants the same fight for existence, but on the level of the individual. Then you can suddenly remove everyone you deem as unfit (e.g. everyone that is average or even below average in mental and physical terms) with no moral conflict. Liberalism meant nothing more than the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life - thanks to it we have no war among nations/ideas, but rather the total war among individuals.

@IslaVista2014, @Mentally lost cel, @your personality, @MarquisDeSade

tbh but they lose most of their power if you don't really care about their shaming. Which is why they then use character assassination tactics and cherrypick what you say while putting words in your mouth in between to try and further their narrative about how you are defective. If shaming you won't work then lying about and ascribing bad motives to you for not going along with what they say is the next best thing.

 

[MarquisDeSade]

They genuinely hate you when you don't dedicate your life to the rat's race that is the competition in the liberal so(y)ciety. If you watch TV or just LDAR after work without breaking your body in the gym or acquiring new skills like languages/programming/etc. they hate you, they see you as the worthless detritus of so(y)ciety unworthy of having relationships or even basal human rights - look at their disdain for NEETs, "uneducated" workers, people that cannot work due to mental/physical problems or those who see no sense in it due to the improvements of life quality associated with working nowadays being too small. They unironically seem to want an Aktion T4 (=euthanasia in the 3rd Reich) for those that they deem as "lazy parasites"/dregs of society (as long as they don't belong to the groups they deem as worth protecting like certain sexual/ethnic minorities and women because then suddenly the inexcusable becomes excusable and failure is acceptable).

Unironically: Liberalism (in its modern form) is nothing more than applied social darwinism (with lenience for some groups) - but on the level of the individual (and not on the level of groups like nations/races/religions/etc. which they would deem as archaic), prior to this humans had a group identity (like a nation/ideology/religion/etc.) and competed mostly in a group-speficic manner (to enable the victory of their social ideas/nations and the higher goals associated with it), as long as you belonged to the in-group you had some lenience and a certain worth automatically, but nowadays we have the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life due to social disintegration and the lack of group identities/higher goals, people nowadays live like rats and eat each other with no form of social cohesion and all people openly being natural enemies (but as long as it isn't on a group level it's fine in the eyes of liberalism) - the human is worthless nowadays (unless he belongs to the physical/mental/financial A-class as an extraordinary specimen).

If you said anything they literally say to individuals with lacking capabilities to a group that is on average not as capable as other groups (like blacks in the USA due to IQ or women everywhere due to physical strength) they would accuse you of being a monster, but on the individual level everything should be allowed due to total darwinism on the individual scale.
This modern/open/welcoming so(y)ciety is the coldest and most inhumane so(y)ciety with nothing more than battles/fights for the most basal things in life, look at how they talk about people and then you realize that there is absolutely no difference between the social views of a stereotypical Hollywood movie Nazi/Social Darwinist and a liberal - only that one person uses group-based criteria and the other wants the same fight for existence, but on the level of the individual. Then you can suddenly remove everyone you deem as unfit (e.g. everyone that is average or even below average in mental and physical terms) with no moral conflict. Liberalism meant nothing more than the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life - thanks to it we have no war among nations/ideas, but rather the total war among individuals.

@IslaVista2014, @Mentally lost cel, @your personality, @MarquisDeSade

Social egalitarianism is non-existent in this world and the neo-liberal elite knows this, of course they don't have any particular allegiance to any ideology as their ideology is purely power only, but they'll gladly give lip service to any particular popular ideology of the day if it means that it helps them keep their own power.

Going back to social egalitarianism again, they know social egalitarianism doesn't exist and cannot but they must give the appearances or facade that it does to distract the dumb idiotic masses and camouflage their own activities, a monetary completely oligarchic totalitarian eugenics based society just sounds so much better when you call it democracy, egalitarianism, and a free society for public outward appearances when the dumb downed population within it is too stupefied to know any better to even distinguish the difference.

As for individualism it's a trick you see, by putting all the burden on the individual level it absolves all externalizations and therefore renders the individual powerless to blame their problems on the prevailing authority, society, or the environment they're in, this is how inverted totalitarianism works especially when individualism is center.

"It's your fault individually for your own problems, not society's or the government and the elite that controls it, it's all you the individual you see!"

 

[Deleted member 32725]

Skimmed through but just want to say that Soygon of Applebee's still hasn't brought me my BLT and fuck "Neoliberal" youtubers

 

[mentally lost cel 1]

They genuinely hate you when you don't dedicate your life to the rat's race that is the competition in the liberal so(y)ciety. If you watch TV or just LDAR after work without breaking your body in the gym or acquiring new skills like languages/programming/etc. they hate you, they see you as the worthless detritus of so(y)ciety unworthy of having relationships or even basal human rights - look at their disdain for NEETs, "uneducated" workers, people that cannot work due to mental/physical problems or those who see no sense in it due to the improvements of life quality associated with working nowadays being too small. They unironically seem to want an Aktion T4 (=euthanasia in the 3rd Reich) for those that they deem as "lazy parasites"/dregs of society (as long as they don't belong to the groups they deem as worth protecting like certain sexual/ethnic minorities and women because then suddenly the inexcusable becomes excusable and failure is acceptable).

Unironically: Liberalism (in its modern form) is nothing more than applied social darwinism (with lenience for some groups) - but on the level of the individual (and not on the level of groups like nations/races/religions/etc. which they would deem as archaic), prior to this humans had a group identity (like a nation/ideology/religion/etc.) and competed mostly in a group-speficic manner (to enable the victory of their social ideas/nations and the higher goals associated with it), as long as you belonged to the in-group you had some lenience and a certain worth automatically, but nowadays we have the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life due to social disintegration and the lack of group identities/higher goals, people nowadays live like rats and eat each other with no form of social cohesion and all people openly being natural enemies (but as long as it isn't on a group level it's fine in the eyes of liberalism) - the human is worthless nowadays (unless he belongs to the physical/mental/financial A-class as an extraordinary specimen).

If you said anything they literally say to individuals with lacking capabilities to a group that is on average not as capable as other groups (like blacks in the USA due to IQ or women everywhere due to physical strength) they would accuse you of being a monster, but on the individual level everything should be allowed due to total darwinism on the individual scale.
This modern/open/welcoming so(y)ciety is the coldest and most inhumane so(y)ciety with nothing more than battles/fights for the most basal things in life, look at how they talk about people and then you realize that there is absolutely no difference between the social views of a stereotypical Hollywood movie Nazi/Social Darwinist and a liberal - only that one person uses group-based criteria and the other wants the same fight for existence, but on the level of the individual. Then you can suddenly remove everyone you deem as unfit (e.g. everyone that is average or even below average in mental and physical terms) with no moral conflict. Liberalism meant nothing more than the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life - thanks to it we have no war among nations/ideas, but rather the total war among individuals.

@IslaVista2014, @Mentally lost cel, @your personality, @MarquisDeSade

High iq and based,I wish things could’ve been different

 

[Saigon Depression]

Very high IQ observation

 

[Deleted member 24297]

Modern liberalism (blm, feminism, gender and lgbtqjidf and other nonsense) is the result of a succesfull psyops from the elite in order to

A) Distract from the real important stuff

B) Diminish masculinity for a weak estrsoygen population that posses no threat

C) A nice snowball effect of controlled opposition

D) the most important one:
Remove humans from their true nature - tranny and snowflake gender politics is a great example. As is the promotion of sexual hypergamous degeneracy and the feminist ideal of a female. But also a thugmaxxed murderer influenced by gangsterrap. Satan is creative. - the further a human is detached from his true self the easier the soul is harvested.

Once a persons mind is so detached the path to return to his true self is too painful to walk thus the person decides to freefall forever in Satans bottomless pit.

Atleast that way the person doesnt feel the pain from hitting the bottom - meaning: forceing oneself to do honest reflection - a human can decide himself when he decides on setting a bottom as Satan will allow freefall ones entire life on earth. Furthermore one decides to freefall forever not only to avoid the pain from hitting a bottom but also to avoid climbing up from the fall - the painful , arduous, long return back.

Once one has fallen so deep it is easier to freefall ones entire life. Imagine a tranny with a cut off dick with the face of a ghoul. Or a foid with a bodycount above 100. They will never decide to look at themself and reflect on their lives in a brutally honest matter. They have fallen so far they want to avoid the pain of hitting the bottom and the great effort to climb back; thus they comfort themselves by deluding, spreading lies and ideology that justifies and glorifies their lifestyle and filthy mind. So they can feel better about themselves falling as others are jumping into the pit aswell. By their own selfdefense mechanisms of promoting satanic lies they voluntarily become agents and pawns doing the work of the master of the scheme all by themself.


The further a mind is detached from ones trueself the more easily that soul is harvasted. Once a mind has fallen too far and the ardant cowardice towards facing reality is too great... that soul is in your possession.

 

[Lebensmüder]

Modern liberalism (blm, feminism, gender and lgbtqjidf and other nonsense) is the result of a succesfull psyops from the elite in order to

A) Distract from the real important stuff

B) Diminish masculinity for a weak estrsoygen population that posses no threat

C) A nice snowball effect of controlled opposition

D) the most important one:
Remove humans from their true nature (tranny and snowflake gender politics is a great example. As is the promotion of sexual hypergamous degeneracy and the feminist ideal of a female. But also a thugmaxxed murderer influenced by gangsterrap. Satan is creative. ) . The further a human is detached from his true self. The easier the soul is harvested. Once a person is so detached the path to return is to his true self is too painful to walk thus the person decides to freefall forever in Satans bottomless pit. Atleast that way the person doesnt feel the pain from hitting the bottom - meaning - forceing oneself to do honest reflection , a human can decide himself when he decides on setting a bottom as Satan will allow freefall ones entire life on earth. And to avoid climbing up from the fall - the painful long return.

Once one has fallen so deep it is easier to freefall ones entire life. Imagine a tranny with a cut off dick with the face of a ghoul. Or a foid with a bodycount above 100. They will never decide to look at themself in an brutally honest matter. They have fallen so far they want to avoid the pain of hitting the bottom and the great effort to climb back by spreading lies and ideology that justifies and glorifies their lifestyle and filthy mind. So they can feel better about themselves falling as others are jumping into the pit aswell. By their selfdefense mechanisms of promoting satanic lies they voluntarily become agents and pawns doing the work of the master of the scheme all by themself.


The further a mind is detached from ones trueself the more easily that soul is harvasted. Once a mind has fallen too far and the ardant cowardice towards facing reality is too great. That soul is in your possession.

Very brutal. And true.

 

[mentally lost cel 1]

They genuinely hate you when you don't dedicate your life to the rat's race that is the competition in the liberal so(y)ciety. If you watch TV or just LDAR after work without breaking your body in the gym or acquiring new skills like languages/programming/etc. they hate you, they see you as the worthless detritus of so(y)ciety unworthy of having relationships or even basal human rights - look at their disdain for NEETs, "uneducated" workers, people that cannot work due to mental/physical problems or those who see no sense in it due to the improvements of life quality associated with working nowadays being too small. They unironically seem to want an Aktion T4 (=euthanasia in the 3rd Reich) for those that they deem as "lazy parasites"/dregs of society (as long as they don't belong to the groups they deem as worth protecting like certain sexual/ethnic minorities and women because then suddenly the inexcusable becomes excusable and failure is acceptable).

Unironically: Liberalism (in its modern form) is nothing more than applied social darwinism (with lenience for some groups) - but on the level of the individual (and not on the level of groups like nations/races/religions/etc. which they would deem as archaic), prior to this humans had a group identity (like a nation/ideology/religion/etc.) and competed mostly in a group-speficic manner (to enable the victory of their social ideas/nations and the higher goals associated with it), as long as you belonged to the in-group you had some lenience and a certain worth automatically, but nowadays we have the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life due to social disintegration and the lack of group identities/higher goals, people nowadays live like rats and eat each other with no form of social cohesion and all people openly being natural enemies (but as long as it isn't on a group level it's fine in the eyes of liberalism) - the human is worthless nowadays (unless he belongs to the physical/mental/financial A-class as an extraordinary specimen).

If you said anything they literally say to individuals with lacking capabilities to a group that is on average not as capable as other groups (like blacks in the USA due to IQ or women everywhere due to physical strength) they would accuse you of being a monster, but on the individual level everything should be allowed due to total darwinism on the individual scale.
This modern/open/welcoming so(y)ciety is the coldest and most inhumane so(y)ciety with nothing more than battles/fights for the most basal things in life, look at how they talk about people and then you realize that there is absolutely no difference between the social views of a stereotypical Hollywood movie Nazi/Social Darwinist and a liberal - only that one person uses group-based criteria and the other wants the same fight for existence, but on the level of the individual. Then you can suddenly remove everyone you deem as unfit (e.g. everyone that is average or even below average in mental and physical terms) with no moral conflict. Liberalism meant nothing more than the expansion of the battle zone into every aspect of life - thanks to it we have no war among nations/ideas, but rather the total war among individuals.

@IslaVista2014, @Mentally lost cel, @your personality, @MarquisDeSade

Best thread of all time man,fucking awesome

 

[Lebensmüder]

Best thread of all time man,fucking awesome

Very high IQ observation

Thanks again tbh.

 

[osman27]

Bump

Great thread

 

[Izayacel]

Loosers want to be winners too so they struggle selflessly like rats

While the winners already passed their finishline and are in another echolon , enjoying themselfs



Its Everyone for themselfs