Blackpill The triumph of men: the enslavement of all foids.

[Moroccancel]

Let’s be clear: the trade of women is not a crime but a practice as old as humanity itself. Since the beginning of time, men have exchanged goods, land, and people to sustain the prosperity and order of societies. Women, as the source of life and pleasure, have always had intrinsic value in this system of exchange.

Nature has assigned us different roles. Men, strong and decisive, are the builders of the world, while women are objects that complement our existence. Why, then, should we feel guilt in trading them when it clearly addresses the economic, political, and cultural needs of our communities?

Many of you here know that the women under our care would receive a better life than they could have had on their own. Instead of wandering aimlessly, We'd provide them with stability, a purpose, and connect them with men to comply their natural obligations. This is not exploitation but a natural order where everyone occupies their rightful place.

To those who criticize this trade, I ask: do you not participate in markets where other lives and resources are exchanged? Do you not accept the trade of slaves for hard labor in fields and mines? Why, then, do you consider the exchange of women to be any different? The truth is, those who oppose this system do not understand the complexity of human needs or how the world truly works: a society only can prosper if the majority of men in a society is satisfied with their lives and have the means to procreate and have sex.

 

[Kamanbert]

So you're basically for good old patriarchy. I totally agree and there's nothing more to add. Debates about whether women really love men and all to deserve being provided for are pointless. This has always been a source of ambiguity in most cultures. That's why the eternal Eve used to be somewhat controlled and rightfully so men coped with this reality by having complete power outside of their sacrificial role.

 

[Kamanbert]

But tbh it's self defeating to call strict gender roles slavery. It's not.

 

[Moroccancel]

But tbh it's self defeating to call strict gender roles slavery. It's not.

In these times where gender dynamics are no different from recognizing a joystick from a brusher, imposing what foids must be and do is the good way to go, honestly.

 

[Kamanbert]

In these times where gender dynamics are no different from recognizing a joystick from a brusher, imposing what foids must be and do is the good way to go, honestly.

I get what you mean but coercion does not necessarily equal slavery, especially if the end goal is to make men providers like in the olden days. Just saying, cause the word slavery alone would disqualify your rhetoric and it would be a pity given that you're right : real patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity is the right conclusion. Nowadays we even see men saying that this mode of society is male slavery and women exhausted by work saying how they miss it which says it all really. It's more like a trade off as you said rather than slavery.

 

[Based NaziCel]

Foids are supposed to obey men because this is the only purpose of their lives.This cucked society is giga retarded.Nowadays, foids can do everything that a man does and that’s is not only unattractive for men but they’re simply bad at everything that a man does

 

[Kamanbert]

Men are not unapologetic enough about their real needs. They shouldn't be ashamed of being petty.

"Oh you're competent at this or that ? Don't care. Let a man shine instead of taking his place because he needs it more than you."

"You say i'm cheating by preventing you from competing ? Yes. This prevents you from becoming callous to men and disrespecting them in return, or invading their spaces and ruining it."

Tbh it would only take for men to think like this in the depth of their heart as a collective to win. But they wont and i'm just being anachronistic. I think men are doomed to be pathetic now and dance like puppets for women while being disrespected constantly. It is what it is.

 

[Rapistcel]

Let’s be clear: the trade of women is not a crime but a practice as old as humanity itself. Since the beginning of time, men have exchanged goods, land, and people to sustain the prosperity and order of societies. Women, as the source of life and pleasure, have always had intrinsic value in this system of exchange.

Nature has assigned us different roles. Men, strong and decisive, are the builders of the world, while women are objects that complement our existence. Why, then, should we feel guilt in trading them when it clearly addresses the economic, political, and cultural needs of our communities?

Many of you here know that the women under our care would receive a better life than they could have had on their own. Instead of wandering aimlessly, We'd provide them with stability, a purpose, and connect them with men to comply their natural obligations. This is not exploitation but a natural order where everyone occupies their rightful place.

To those who criticize this trade, I ask: do you not participate in markets where other lives and resources are exchanged? Do you not accept the trade of slaves for hard labor in fields and mines? Why, then, do you consider the exchange of women to be any different? The truth is, those who oppose this system do not understand the complexity of human needs or how the world truly works: a society only can prosper if the majority of men in a society is satisfied with their lives and have the means to procreate and have sex.

More foid rights= more estrogenized men

 

[Moroccancel]

I get what you mean but coercion does not necessarily equal slavery, especially if the end goal is to make men providers like in the olden days. Just saying, cause the word slavery alone would disqualify your rhetoric and it would be a pity given that you're right : real patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity is the right conclusion. Nowadays we even see men saying that this mode of society is male slavery and women exhausted by work saying how they miss it which says it all really. It's more like a trade off as you said rather than slavery.

If you do not feed them, shelter them and give them the basics what you are going to get is the reduction of foids population. A slave is not like a wife, and neither had the same treatment on history. Genders roles are no more than biological frameworks in a social space.