Blackpill The Structure Of Modern Age Of Consent Laws Is About Keeping Low Tier Males As Perpetual Losers And Opposing "Patriarchal Norms"

[BlkPillPres]

I've been thinking about how modern age of consent works and its completely illogical, and the only reason I can see for its current structure is to prevent men who "failed" in their teens from ever experiencing "teen love"

1. How age of consent laws make no sense logically

Think about it, the way the law works is completely illogical, its first asserted that a teen is unable to consent to sex with an adult, but conveniently when another teen is involved their ability to consent is now valid and should be acknowledged

The law would make complete sense if it were illegal for teens to have sex period, but its strictly only illegal for them to have sex with adults, which means there's a clear intent to bar off certain age groups from access to teens, and this is obviously targeted at men and not women, as men are the ones with an inclination towards neoteny

Notice the same logic is never applied to alcohol, if an adult gives a teen alcohol the adult is punished in some legal way, if a teen gives another teen alcohol or drinks alcohol by themselves they will also face some kind of minor legal punishment, if we applied the logic of age of consent laws to alcohol teens should be able to drink all the alcohol they want and face no punishment as long as no adult is involved

Its ridiculous to argue that teens should know better when it comes to alcohol, but when it comes to sex we label them as invalids and affirm that they shouldn't know any better

Do you know what is the most ridiculous example of how age of consent laws make no sense:
If a TEEN has sex with an ADULT its illegal just for the ADULT
If a TEEN has sex with a TEEN its completely legal for both TEENS
However if both TEENS filmed themselves having sex and released the video they can both be charged as ADULTS for distribution of child pornography



Make that make sense, try your best

If releasing a video of an act, now renders the act "bad enough" to arrest someone for the act, then shouldn't it be illegal for them to engage in the act to begin with?

Two teens having sex, goes from "legal safe consensual fun" to "despicable and heinous sex crime" just like that, these age of consent laws are completely illogical


2. Why I think the law is targeted towards low tier males

We all know society hates low tier males, but I think we underestimate just how much, society in a way seems to have conspired to keep low tier males "in our place" as perpetual losers based on my observations of how laws are structured

A good example is Canada's prostitution laws (France's is similar) where its LEGAL to sell sex but ILLEGAL to purchase it, its clearly structured in such a way as to only punish males and males only, the same logic would never be applied to something more "unisex" like drugs, imagine if drug laws were about punishing only the person that buys them, but drug dealers never got charged?

When it comes to punishing low tier males society craves this so much logic goes out the window

Low tier males are usually the type to fail at having dating lives in their teens, so they will work hard and gather wealth, and try to make up for it in their later years, the purpose of how age of consent laws are structured, is about keeping young beautiful women these men have wanted their entire lives forever out of their reach, its about keeping them perpetual losers, they'll never have their chance to enjoy youth of that level, they are forever being barred off from that experience

So a 16 year old girl can get gangbanged by the entire high school football team and that's perfectly healthy, normal, and acceptable, but a man in his 20's (or older) trying to court that same 16 year old for marriage and children, now that's completely detestable and he's a fucking evil degenerate JFL

We all know this makes no sense at all, how can we treat teen girls getting passed around like trinkets as them being "competent" and giving consent, but they magically lose that competence and ability to consent the moment the male trying to court them is an "adult", and ironically that adult's intentions may actually be "purer", he might be looking for a wife rather than just his "next fuck" on some list to boast about with his friends (which is the guys usually have sex with teens in their schools because they are the same age)

It has nothing to do with logic, or morality, its about securing women as a resource, and keeping certain men from having access to certain women, because if these men can gain access, THEY WILL NO LONGER BE A PART OF THE RAT RACE, they'd no longer tolerate all the things that adult women are doing, women don't want men to "marry young", because that leaves them with no betas to snatch them up after they get off the cock carousel, and age of consent laws (whether intentional or not) help to keep old and used up women "in fashion" as they are pretty much the only options low tier males have, as they can't pursue young women

Society doesn't want low tier males having access to young, beautiful and virile women because that upsets the current balance, society's needs a healthy stock of betas to pass off onto all the women that get off of the cock carousel and are old and used up

If were all busy chasing younger women when they are younger and have less options, then we'd more likely be married to them and have control over them in their later years

Also keeping young women away from older men keeps society from becoming more patriarchal, which again threatens the status quo, society needs women to remain "liberated" and hypergamous else things will begin to become orderly again

 

[Personalityinkwell]

High IQ.

Also important is setting the age of consent to 18 so every girl will lose her virginity before she gets married, so any girl who isn't a virgin is no longer stigamitized because 99 PERCENT of girls aren't virgin wives anymore.

 

[Deleted member 20811]

Very well-written, based, blackilled & High IQ post

 

[guaucel]

Muh status quo is fine

 

[Deleted member 19236]

That way, you just proved that society has conspired against us lowtier males.

 

[Kashayam]

What can we do about it ?

 

[Deleted member 19546]

I disagree with the idea of men dating much younger women, that would only exacerbate inceldom,

if 16 year old girls are being taken by men in their 20s, then 16 year old guys will have no one, until they themselves become older and grow taller, get money, car, apartment and shit.

The more young teenage girls date up agewise, the more male teen incels who don’t experience teen love.

As a teencel, I don’t wanna get cucked by older dudes.

Age of consent should be a limit of no more than 2 years difference between partners if one of them is below the age of 22.

 

[littlemanhikicel]

This western society is broken. We need traditional values like marry teen people at 12 or 13 yo , that's the only way each man can get a virgin wife even incel men. But we live in a fucking jungle with no broterhood. Here in spain the gypsis marry their ppl at that age and they are so proud of their women.

 

[NEETard]

Its to stop teenage girls from being whores who fuck older men. Has nothing to do with the older men being ugly. Normies and chads (19-25) fuck 14-17 year old girls all the time. Thats because the girls are attracted to them.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I disagree with the idea of men dating much younger women, that would only exacerbate inceldom,

if 16 year old girls are being taken by men in their 20s, then 16 year old guys will have no one, until they themselves become older and grow taller, get money, car, apartment and shit.

The more young teenage girls date up agewise, the more male teen incels who don’t experience teen love.

As a teencel, I don’t wanna get cucked by older dudes.

Age of consent should be a limit of no more than 2 years difference between partners if one of them is below the age of 22.

I can get behind this tbh. As an incel in my 20's, even if a teenage girl was attracted to me over a high school chadlite, I can't get her now.

However, if I could have legal access, well then the Chadlites and Chads would outcompete me since and I would still be an incel.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

I can get behind this tbh. As an incel in my 20's, even if a teenage girl was attracted to me over a high school chadlite, I can't get her now.

However, if I could have legal access, well then the Chadlites and Chads would outcompete me since and I would still be an incel.

if you're in your 20s, it takes a lot of balls to date a 16 year old

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Read every word

 

[Personalityinkwell]

if you're in your 20s, it takes a lot of balls to date a 16 year old

In today's society yes. However I would be willing to date a 16 year old if society wasn't fighting against that arrangement.

 

[failmaxxed]

well said, raising AOC laws was one of the first things the feminists did. Downfall of society. You ised to be able to marry young and stay yogether for life. Its all been taken away from us.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

In today's society yes. However I would be willing to date a 16 year old if society wasn't fighting against that arrangement.

i think it's insane how some people want you executed for dating a 16 year old. seriously go to articles about a man who had sex with a 16 year old and everyone wants his balls cut off and him hung in public. it's crazy

 

[BlkPillPres]

if 16 year old girls are being taken by men in their 20s, then 16 year old guys will have no one, until they themselves become older and grow taller, get money, car, apartment and shit.

1. No, low tier males aren't getting teen girls anyways, so only high tier males would lose out, and that would create a resource based meritocracy of acquiring women rather than a looks based one, so we'd all have to compete for resources, which is more meritocratic than someone just being born better looking than you and you remaining a virgin into your late 30's

2. We'd all atleast get our turn, we wouldn't get the teens of our era, but we'd get the teens produced by the very men who "took" our teens, so they actually serve a purpose in keeping the whole thing going, everybody gets a turn at dating teens

The more young teenage girls date up agewise, the more male teen incels who don’t experience teen love.

I don't think you even read over that sentence, please read over that sentence and you'd immediately see how it makes no sense, you said "the more male teen incels who don't experience love", attractive men are going to get laid regardless, if you are an incel teen, an older man dating a teen girl who wouldn't fuck you to begin with makes no difference, you can't lose that which you never had to begin with, this system doesn't affect incel males at all, it only affects normie males and chads (and barely chads, they'd still get laid)

As a teencel, I don’t wanna get cucked by older dudes.

Again you need to read over these sentences because they don't make sense, you can only get cucked IF YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A CHANCE, and if you have a chance THEN YOU AREN'T INCEL

So which is it, are you incel or not, if older men not being there means you get laid, THEN YOU AREN'T INCEL

Age of consent should be a limit of no more than 2 years difference between partners if one of them is below the age of 22.

Completely arbitrary, age of consent I believe should be determined by the average age teens engage in sex (based on a survey)

In other words if teens are fucking other teens at X starting age (on average), then they can fuck adults when they are that age too, that's the only logical rule set, and that way the moral structure of society determines the age of consent, if women start to become more chaste and less women are having sex before marriage, the age of consent increases, if its the reverse it decreases

Its to stop teenage girls from being whores who fuck older men. Has nothing to do with the older men being ugly. Normies and chads (19-25) fuck 14-17 year old girls all the time. Thats because the girls are attracted to them.

I never said its because older men are ugly, my point is the men who are more likely to pursue teens are men who never got to experience "teen love", teen Chad has had his fill and is now busy dating "full bodied women" (well more likely than not)

The law is targeted towards preventing low tier males from having access to women society knows they will pursue, because if you can "get them while they're young" you're more likely to marry them, escape the "beta trap" society has in store for you, and spread patriarchal values

 

[Deleted member 19546]

you can only get cucked IF YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A CHANCE, and if you have a chance THEN YOU AREN'T INCEL

By that logic then age of consent laws don’t target incels in their 20s because without them those 20scels wouldn’t get laid anyways because they never had a chance.

teen Chad has had his fill and is now busy dating "full bodied women" (well more likely than not)

Gigacope, look at Leonardo DiChadprio. ALL men will date younger women if they have the chance because younger women are ALWAYS the best option.

Teen girls have MASSIVE SMV in no world would they date oldcels even if it was legal.

 

[BlkPillPres]

By that logic then age of consent laws don’t target incels in their 20s because without them those 20scels wouldn’t get laid anyways because they never had a chance.

Wrong, because women pursue men primarily for looks, but also for resources, hence the existence of "sugar daddies", once you have that "hook" in a young girl you can probably get her to marry you, and since she's young she doesn't know what its like to work and have her own money which allows her to exclusively fund her life of chasing Chad cock

Better yet if she's young and from a religious community you can capitalize on the values instilled upon her to keep her from straying and looking for Chad after marriage

Its not definite, but its possible, there's a chance, but if you can only date older women as an incel THEN YOU HAVE NO CHANCE, because older women are "hip to the game", they know they want Chad cock, they have all the money and resources to pursue him, and they know all the laws favor them and their choices

Getting women while they are young teens, is about "locking them down" before they realize the potential choices they have, as bad as that sounds, its a valid strategy, a patriarchal strategy that was the norm of the past, forever lost to those of us in the modern era

Gigacope, look at Leonardo DiChadprio. ALL men will date younger women if they have the chance because younger women are ALWAYS the best option

I said "more likely than not" as in Chads do date teens but more of them are dating women their age, that's a fact

The average Chad isn't dating young teens (they are blue pilled and completely believe in modern concepts of age and sex), ironically you would be arguing something even more aggregious than I am at that point, that the laws are being geared towards giving adult Chad only access to teens, rather than my less extreme argument that the law is merely prevent low tier males from having access to teens

Teen girls have MASSIVE SMV in no world would they date oldcels even if it was legal.

JFL SMV doesn't matter when it comes to drastic differences in resources, that's why claiming women before they get into the working world is important, the worst thing feminism did wasn't giving women the right to vote, or the sexual revolution, it was giving women the right to work and own property, it doesn't matter how much you want to do something if you can't afford to do it, and women being able to work is what affords them the ability to chase Chad, that's why in the past women married beta's and married young, those were their best options since they couldn't work

The most important aspect of the patriarchy is women lacking resources, SMV only matters when were all on an equal playing field for resources, women would have no choice but to settle for their looks matches if they couldn't work and own property, in fact that's how things worked in the past

Or are you forgetting?

 

[NEETard]

I never said its because older men are ugly, my point is the men who are more likely to pursue teens are men who never got to experience "teen love", teen Chad has had his fill and is now busy dating "full bodied women" (well more likely than not)

The law is targeted towards preventing low tier males from having access to women society knows they will pursue, because if you can "get them while they're young" you're more likely to marry them, escape the "beta trap" society has in store for you, and spread patriarchal values

I dont think there is any link between 'not experiencing teen love' and 'being attracted to teen girls when youre 20+"

Confirmation bias. Most guys who date teen girls are chads or normies. You really think the age of consent laws were to protect women from ugly virgins who obsess over missing out on teen love? Or was the law made to stop the normie sex havers who are fucking their daughters?

 

[Emba]

High IQ.

Also important is setting the age of consent to 18 so every girl will lose her virginity before she gets married, so any girl who isn't a virgin is no longer stigamitized because 99 PERCENT of girls aren't virgin wives anymore.

Good point! No more pairbonding!
Or at least, damaged pairbonding...

I can get behind this tbh. As an incel in my 20's, even if a teenage girl was attracted to me over a high school chadlite, I can't get her now.

However, if I could have legal access, well then the Chadlites and Chads would outcompete me since and I would still be an incel.

Still over for me though...

 

[BlkPillPres]

I dont think there is any link between 'not experiencing teen love' and 'being attracted to teen girls when youre 20+"

I don't think its a coincidence that most hebephiles and pedohpiles are usually unattractive many, there's a reason the stereotype of the balding guy in his 30's with glasses became the stereotypical "look" for a pedophile or hebephile, its because that's the kind of guys they were catching a lot

Seriously ask yourself if you were about to open a door that had a pedophile on the other side, would you actually be expecting it to be a guy that looks like Dolph Lundgren, no you'd be expecting some Steve Buscemi looking fucker (google those two guys if you don't already know how they look)

I'm pretty sure there is a link between pedophilia, hebephilia, and lack of sexual development in your younger years, there are certain "milestones" you need to hit at certain age ranges so that you can become attracted to women at later stages, and a lot of us haven't moved past the youth phase, were still mentally stuck as teens mentally with regards to sex

Not in some innate biological sense, but in a psychological sense, I'm not arguing that being attracted to "full bodied" women is "more natural", I'm arguing that it is socially enforced, and is only normalized in society by force, but one can only fall into that normalization and accept it "peacefully" if they've "had their fill" of neoteny in their younger years

Low tier males always feel like they are "missing out", so youth is always more alluring, always more enchanting to us

I seriously believe that have I had significant romantic experiences during my teen years, I would not be a hebephile as I am now, and all of my hebephilia is due to my past yearnings, which have not stopped because they are yet to be satisfied, until I get to fuck some jail bait I'm always going to want it, crave it

Think I'll make this post a thread

Confirmation bias. Most guys who date teen girls are chads or normies. You really think the age of consent laws were to protect women from ugly virgins who obsess over missing out on teen love? Or was the law made to stop the normie sex havers who are fucking their daughters?

That's kind of a weird argument, pretty much contradictory

First you say - "Most guys who date teen girls are chads or normies"
Then you assert age of consent laws are primarily about stopping normie sex havers from fucking their daughters

That doesn't make sense, if its already indisputable that its mainly chads and normies already fucking these girls, then its indisputable that the law doesn't matter because it doesn't make a difference, as chads and normies aren't age restrictive terms, so the law doesn't prevent anything, like I asserted, the law only prevents those who don't have access to them when they are "the right age", which is "low tier males", losers

 

[BITG]

High IQ.

Also important is setting the age of consent to 18 so every girl will lose her virginity before she gets married, so any girl who isn't a virgin is no longer stigamitized because 99 PERCENT of girls aren't virgin wives anymore.

 

[NEETard]

I don't think its a coincidence that most hebephiles and pedohpiles are usually unattractive many, there's a reason the stereotype of the balding guy in his 30's with glasses became the stereotypical "look" for a pedophile or hebephile, its because that's the kind of guys they were catching a lot

Seriously ask yourself if you were about to open a door that had a pedophile on the other side, would you actually be expecting it to be a guy that looks like Dolph Lundgren, no you'd be expecting some Steve Buscemi looking fucker (google those two guys if you don't already know how they look)

I'm pretty sure there is a link between pedophilia, hebephilia, and lack of sexual development in your younger years, there are certain "milestones" you need to hit at certain age ranges so that you can become attracted to women at later stages, and a lot of us haven't moved past the youth phase, were still mentally stuck as teens mentally with regards to sex

Not in some innate biological sense, but in a psychological sense, I'm not arguing that being attracted to "full bodied" women is "more natural", I'm arguing that it is socially enforced, and is only normalized in society by force, but one can only fall into that normalization and accept it "peacefully" if they've "had their fill" of neoteny in their younger years

Low tier males always feel like they are "missing out", so youth is always more alluring, always more enchanting to us

I seriously believe that have I had significant romantic experiences during my teen years, I would not be a hebephile as I am now, and all of my hebephilia is due to my past yearnings, which have not stopped because they are yet to be satisfied, until I get to fuck some jail bait I'm always going to want it, crave it

Think I'll make this post a thread



That's kind of a weird argument, pretty much contradictory

First you say - "Most guys who date teen girls are chads or normies"
Then you assert age of consent laws are primarily about stopping normie sex havers from fucking their daughters

That doesn't make sense, if its already indisputable that its mainly chads and normies already fucking these girls, then its indisputable that the law doesn't matter because it doesn't make a difference, as chads and normies aren't age restrictive terms, so the law doesn't prevent anything, like I asserted, the law only prevents those who don't have access to them when they are "the right age", which is "low tier males", losers

 

[Napoleon de Jizzbal]

nuke "society"

 

[Fat Link]

 

[Deleted member 22907]

High IQ.

 

[BlkPillPres]

What does this have to do with anything?, please explain

 

[tulasdanslos]

virile women

You'd fuck this?

I'm not judging but wtf man...

 

[BlkPillPres]

You'd fuck this?

I'm not judging but wtf man...

Didn't know there was a female equivalent of virile (Muliebrity), only just googled it because of your post lol

 

[Deleted member 4159]

I completely agree, it's all about increasing gynocentrism. Also consider that an adult female having sex with a teenage male will receive far less punishment (if at all) than if the roles are reversed.

 

[mänline]

So a 16 year old girl can get gangbanged by the entire high school football team and that's perfectly healthy, normal, and acceptable, but a man in his 20's (or older) trying to court that same 16 year old for marriage and children, now that's completely detestable and he's a fucking evil degenerate JFL

I agree in theory, but are there teenage girls who want marry a beta provider in his 20s? At least it would probably not the same girl, who likes to get gangbanged by the football team.

 

[happiless]

I disagree with the idea of men dating much younger women, that would only exacerbate inceldom,

if 16 year old girls are being taken by men in their 20s, then 16 year old guys will have no one, until they themselves become older and grow taller, get money, car, apartment and shit.

The more young teenage girls date up agewise, the more male teen incels who don’t experience teen love.

As a teencel, I don’t wanna get cucked by older dudes.

Age of consent should be a limit of no more than 2 years difference between partners if one of them is below the age of 22.

Fuck your ageism. Teen bitches should be selling themselves so no man has to miss out on teen pussy. Your solution would just distribute more foids to Chads 2 years above their age.

 

[Speedloader]

Large iq

 

[Angry_runt]

If age of consent laws affect you, then you're not an incel.

 

[Mainländer]

Da Vinci IQ.

Those laws are 100% based on cheap emotionality and 0% on logic and reason. Just try to apply the same logic of those laws to other things and you see how retarded it is:

"You're considered old enough to drive, but wait, you can only drive near other drivers around your age, or else it's a crime!"

"You're considered old enough to work, but wait, you can only work with other workers around your age, or else it's a crime!"

"Hey, did you just download a picture/video for free from the internet depicting someone stealing a car? You're under arrest for possession of media containing car theft!".

 

[BlkPillPres]

At least it would probably not the same girl, who likes to get gangbanged by the football team.

All girls are THAT GIRL, they BECOME that girl because we no longer live in a society that controls women and prevents then from acting out on their whorish desires

That's why the phrase - "get em while they're young" is a thing, this video is good advice


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvM-N90dIjM

You got to marry these girls when they are about 15 or 16. They’ll pick your ducks.

Mainly because these boys are waiting until they get to be about 20 years old before they marry ‘em. Look, you wait until they get to be 20 years old, the only picking that’s going to take place is your pocket.

If you married a 15 or 16 year old and you treated her "like a princess", and you were her first everything, its very unlikely that she'd ever cheat on you or leave you, especially if you lived in a community where other such relationships were a norm

When it comes to humans, nurture trumps nature, but women are no longer being guided towards certain mindsets, so nature is free to function as it always does

 

[mänline]

All girls are THAT GIRL, they BECOME that girl because we no longer live in a society that controls women and prevents then from acting out on their whorish desires

But society cannot control thoughts. But I agree that society plays a role to give women guidelines and recommendations which don't spoil their spirit negatively.
Being her first and living in a more traditional society, where holiness is a value, would be good circumstances that she seek and loves you or at least is not repelled by you in the first place and grows in love to you with time.
Both will not be a guarantee, even when you live your marriage daily under Gods word, that she will be faithful and keeps loving and subjecting to you because it is a fallen world nonetheless, but the chances are very high.

I think we can both agree to: It would not be enough to change the modern age of consent laws. It can only be a piece of the puzzle so that (slightly) older men have access to young women.

 

[BlkPillPres]

But society cannot control thoughts

Yes and thoughts don't affect the world, actions do

 

[Made in Heaven]

Yes and thoughts don't affect the world, actions do

Thoughts influence actions

 

[BlkPillPres]

Thoughts influence actions

Which doesn't matter if one is too afraid to act, the the purpose of laws, social norms, cultural values, etc, to control the actions of a people, doesn't matter what they think of believe if they are still restricted by these things

Also actions influence thoughts more than thoughts influence actions

If I just think about killing someone I may or may not kill that person

If that someone beat me to a pulp last week I'm more likely to kill them

 

[Sheogorath]

High IQ.

yes but few will appreciate it

 

[bignose]

this is the truth

 

[Emba]

Yes and thoughts don't affect the world, actions do

Acta non verba

 

[Lux]

In the country i live, age of consent is 14, girls that are 14-16 here have a lot of sexual experience in their teens both with guys their age and older; however, the girls here seem to despise older guys that dont have experience and virgins, AKA incels, since the archetype of the "older man" they crave here is the older womanizer with experience on grabbing them in a "hot" way, a older guy that "knows how to fuck well" and since these girls already have experience with guys their age (who fuck a lot here, usually the "thug-looking" ones that sing a trash version of funk) and older also with sexual experience, they only want older guys that are sexhavers, they publicly shame a virgin guy once he makes 18, from 18 to older the guy is already seen as more and more disgusting and repulsive just for being a virgin. So, this country where i live is a interesting case worth to be examined for analysis.

 

[nystagmuscel]

What can we do about it ?

not really any CHOice we can make, it will most likely nevER be fixed

 

[BlkPillPres]

not really any CHOice we can make, it will most likely nevER be fixed

 

[InMinecraft]

OP ignore list's me