It doesn't even matter if I'm an incel and it doesn't affect me, but it's completely absurd that the state thinks it has the right to prohibit men to have consensual relationships with women if they are not like 18, in some countries and probably in the future
Any woman over the age of 18 has already been completely used, has had multiple partners, has done all kinds of sexual practices
Why does the state and society think that man should be forced to eat the leftovers of other chads?
Why does the state and society think that a man should not have the right to have a young, virgin woman at the peak of her beauty?
They are not innocent, they are not children at any time in history
To the 25 argument (which is a myth):
"Despite its prevalence, there’s no actual data set or specific study that can be invoked or pointed at as the obvious source of the claim that ‘the human brain stops developing at age 25’.
It could be a misunderstanding, stemming from brain scanning studies which looked at subjects up to the age of 25. But that’s like saying sprinters can only run 100 metres at most after watching the 100m final at the Olympics. The limit is imposed by the context, not biology.
Stranger myths have spread this way – looking at you, ‘we only use 10 per cent of our brains’.
‘Developing’ does not mean ‘non-functioning’
Just because age 25 isn’t some firm endpoint for development, it doesn’t mean the brain isn’t developing before then. Because it is. It’s developing after that age too, in many cases.
Exactly when ‘developing’ and ‘maturation’ ends is tricky to pin down. The human is essentially an assemblage of many different regions, of varying degrees of complexity, maturing at different rates.
But even if we focus on the frontal lobe, where all the reasoning and thinking occurs (mostly), it’s still very important to remember that brain development isn’t like the building of a house. You don't have to wait until all the walls and floors are done, the plumbing is sorted out and the electrics are installed before it can be used. Before you can actually live in it."
Any woman over the age of 18 has already been completely used, has had multiple partners, has done all kinds of sexual practices
Why does the state and society think that man should be forced to eat the leftovers of other chads?
Why does the state and society think that a man should not have the right to have a young, virgin woman at the peak of her beauty?
They are not innocent, they are not children at any time in history
To the 25 argument (which is a myth):
"Despite its prevalence, there’s no actual data set or specific study that can be invoked or pointed at as the obvious source of the claim that ‘the human brain stops developing at age 25’.
It could be a misunderstanding, stemming from brain scanning studies which looked at subjects up to the age of 25. But that’s like saying sprinters can only run 100 metres at most after watching the 100m final at the Olympics. The limit is imposed by the context, not biology.
Stranger myths have spread this way – looking at you, ‘we only use 10 per cent of our brains’.
‘Developing’ does not mean ‘non-functioning’
Just because age 25 isn’t some firm endpoint for development, it doesn’t mean the brain isn’t developing before then. Because it is. It’s developing after that age too, in many cases.
Exactly when ‘developing’ and ‘maturation’ ends is tricky to pin down. The human is essentially an assemblage of many different regions, of varying degrees of complexity, maturing at different rates.
But even if we focus on the frontal lobe, where all the reasoning and thinking occurs (mostly), it’s still very important to remember that brain development isn’t like the building of a house. You don't have to wait until all the walls and floors are done, the plumbing is sorted out and the electrics are installed before it can be used. Before you can actually live in it."
Last edited:
