I like to put on movies I've already watched in the background while I work, because it's less distracting than watching a new movie, and I can't help but notice that the social network has a ton of problematic 
ideas you simply can't put into films anymore. When I watched it the first time, I was bluepilled, and what stood out to me when watching it was more the power dynamics and the distinctive Trent Reznor score. On this second time, I can't help but notice that this movie is basically about the inner struggle all men face with inceldom: from gigaChad Winklevii, to pretty boy Ed Saverin, to genetic trash Zucc, the film wants to paint a portrait that tech is full of greedy men that see women as trophies to obtain, and these men are STARVING for trophies. How hungry you are for these trophies and keep them determines your success.
I can see a lot of inner inceldom struggle in a lot of Aaron Sorkin scripts. Don't get me wrong he's no incel, but he clearly has a mind that is wired like one. I find it surprising that some consider him a "feminist" writer. He's not. He's an incredibly, entitled-male, blackpilled writer, that thinks he's a feminist, just because he makes his female characters smart. He writes women smarter than they have any right to be. Obnoxiously, unrealistically smart. And then clearly fetishizes them, putting hot smart chicks in Stanford booty shorts. All the chicks in this movie are hot and thin and belong in Hollywood, not the GAY AREA. Women in Sorkin scripts are never the protagonists that have their own goals and desires, they are always the sassy trophies to be obtained by the incel protagonist who is smarter. Aaron Sorkin consistently fails to put onscreen women, warts and all, because they don't exist in his idealized world. Every single female character in this movie is shamelessly either a prop or a trophy despite being PG-13. Sorkin is materially incapable of writing a female he doesn't want to fuck. You just don't see a lot of movies that have a point-of-view like that these days.
The way they sexed up a story that has no right to be sexy to an 11 is another indicator of the incel-lite tendencies of Aaron Sorkin. Who else would write that two white boys will get hot noodlewhores to blow them in a bathroom stall upon meeting them as a reward after making facebook? Most of the sexing up comes in the form of Sean Parker's character. They took incredible liberties to make him a lot more Chad than he is in real life just so they can stuff sexy college women in the background that really had nothing to do with the IRL Facebook story at all. Sean Parker is an aspirational Chad plot device. Sean Parker fucks. Be like Sean Parker.
I didn't know where to throw this in, but it was also brutal that they couldn't even get a curry actor to play the Winklevii's business partner Divya. He looked awfully high caste, and I was not surprised to find later that the actor is a white-italian guy with a little bit of chinese in him, and that the real life Curry had no problem with this casting.
Overall, I think Aaron Sorkin, blackpilled as he is, is not good for men. His scripts perpetuate the Sisyphean narrative of MUST HAVE SEX to feel validated, hamster on a wheel. It is better to just shun this hunger, it's healthier to understand that sex and love is something many men simply cannot have from the get go due to the intractable barrier that is genetics. Although his ideas were seminal, I think they are slowly eroding so we can just move on from the hunger.
ideas you simply can't put into films anymore. When I watched it the first time, I was bluepilled, and what stood out to me when watching it was more the power dynamics and the distinctive Trent Reznor score. On this second time, I can't help but notice that this movie is basically about the inner struggle all men face with inceldom: from gigaChad Winklevii, to pretty boy Ed Saverin, to genetic trash Zucc, the film wants to paint a portrait that tech is full of greedy men that see women as trophies to obtain, and these men are STARVING for trophies. How hungry you are for these trophies and keep them determines your success.I can see a lot of inner inceldom struggle in a lot of Aaron Sorkin scripts. Don't get me wrong he's no incel, but he clearly has a mind that is wired like one. I find it surprising that some consider him a "feminist" writer. He's not. He's an incredibly, entitled-male
, blackpilled writer, that thinks he's a feminist, just because he makes his female characters smart. He writes women smarter than they have any right to be. Obnoxiously, unrealistically smart. And then clearly fetishizes them, putting hot smart chicks in Stanford booty shorts. All the chicks in this movie are hot and thin and belong in Hollywood, not the GAY AREA. Women in Sorkin scripts are never the protagonists that have their own goals and desires, they are always the sassy trophies to be obtained by the incel protagonist who is smarter. Aaron Sorkin consistently fails to put onscreen women, warts and all, because they don't exist in his idealized world. Every single female character in this movie is shamelessly either a prop or a trophy despite being PG-13. Sorkin is materially incapable of writing a female he doesn't want to fuck. You just don't see a lot of movies that have a point-of-view like that these days.The way they sexed up a story that has no right to be sexy to an 11 is another indicator of the incel-lite tendencies of Aaron Sorkin. Who else would write that two white boys will get hot noodlewhores to blow them in a bathroom stall upon meeting them as a reward after making facebook? Most of the sexing up comes in the form of Sean Parker's character. They took incredible liberties to make him a lot more Chad than he is in real life just so they can stuff sexy college women in the background that really had nothing to do with the IRL Facebook story at all. Sean Parker is an aspirational Chad plot device. Sean Parker fucks. Be like Sean Parker.
I didn't know where to throw this in, but it was also brutal that they couldn't even get a curry actor to play the Winklevii's business partner Divya. He looked awfully high caste, and I was not surprised to find later that the actor is a white-italian guy with a little bit of chinese in him, and that the real life Curry had no problem with this casting.
Overall, I think Aaron Sorkin, blackpilled as he is, is not good for men. His scripts perpetuate the Sisyphean narrative of MUST HAVE SEX to feel validated, hamster on a wheel. It is better to just shun this hunger, it's healthier to understand that sex and love is something many men simply cannot have from the get go due to the intractable barrier that is genetics. Although his ideas were seminal, I think they are slowly eroding so we can just move on from the hunger.
Last edited:
