Truecel tier eye area tbh.
Brutal. They had to alter his entire appearance for people to follow him.
Lol, its very funny.
He was incel, according to the Bible
I have no faith in modern so called 'scientists'.
I believe Jesus looked like what we see in the shroud of Turin
View attachment Holy_Face_of_Jesus_from_Shroud_of_Turin_(1909).jpg
The person these 'scientists' have constructed does not even resemble a person from the Levant. He looks Pakistani. This was made with bad intent.
I believe Jesus looked like what we see in the shroud of Turin
View attachment Holy_Face_of_Jesus_from_Shroud_of_Turin_(1909).jpg
The person these 'scientists' have constructed does not even resemble a person from the Levant. He looks Pakistani. This was made with bad intent.
He looks like a jewish sandnigger subhuman hybrid. How can christcucks cope 
People moved, races in a certain geographic location are there no more. Also this pic looks like the stereotypical roman, meaybe a little browner.
a fictional man created by schizophrenics.
bro are you seriously telling me that a middle eastern man looked middle eastern????? WAAAAAAH NOOO THEY ARE LYING HE LOOKED LIKE A CHAD I CAN ONLY WORSHIP CHADSSSS
@Jailbaitmaxxer
Interesting theory
Jesus was most likely an actual person, but just another jewish messianic claimant in a time where basically everyone did it (he just wasnt a violent sociopath like the other ones). The jesus of the gospels was created by paul and others more or less
Pretty much. I do think this facial reconstruction is kinda a joke as we cannot know what he specifocally looked like, but obvi yes
If I was a christcel my faith would only grow stronger if I found out Jesus was an ugly fucker
I think to test their methods by experiment would be taking random skull of a person that had at least few photos of when this person was alive, giving it to them and then compare their reconstitution to actual photo of how person looked like.
They can manipulate this facial reconstitution easily, like for example making reconstitution of ancient people of northern Europe and making them dark or brown to fit the agenda.
Tbh i agree. Christianity is a religion of the opressed:
3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
If jesus was ugly itd fit it well
Yea, that would be a good method of checking that. But than again, this still wouldnt be jesus's "face". It would be the face of an average man from that place and era
stupide boy you are so ridiculous son of a bitch the real jesus christ is like suaire de turin
And yet the niggers still think he's black. Bhahaha STUPID FUCKING NIGGERS!
Just be handsome and be worshipped like a God theory.
jesus was pakistani
Jesus was a caveman!
looks like a caveman
I know this is basically a shitpost, but I feel like it’s a good opportunity to mention that we have basically no concrete evidence that Jesus existed, let alone what he looked like. This is probably just what the average poor person in that time and place looked like.
The accepted theory is that “Yeshua of Nazareth” almost certainly existed in some form, but we really don’t know for sure beyond that. The only real evidence we have of him existing is that it would be unusual for a “cult” to develop centered around a purely fictional character who allegedly lived only 40 years beforehand. More likely that he was real in at least some capacity.
The Shroud of Turin is total fucking bs. The only reason we still talk about it is because religious “scientific” organizations keep dumping money into proving it “real” by any means necessary. There’s really nothing else to be said about the subject.
Someone who knows their shit.
Apocalyptic Jewish preachers were all the rage in the First Century, for obvious reasons. Jews were sick of living under Roman Occupation, and Romans, equally, were getting sick of Jewish bullshit. Temple Judaism (Hebrewism?) was all but a dead religion, carried on by the carcass of the religious authorities who had sold out their people to suck off the Romans for money/power/status/a comfy life.
Every week, some dude was claiming to be the Messiah, and every week, the Romans were pinning that dude to a tree. This continued until Bar Kochba pissed off Hadrian so much that Hadrian put an end to both the region and religion. Judaism almost died as a religion. Christianity unironically kept it alive, partly because Christian leaders wanted to protect “le Chosen People” to serve as an example of what life is like living according to the law and not grace.
Last edited:
Another pointless religious debate eh who cares we will all find out when we die what the truth really is and if we are good or evil or lukewarm or turn into nothing or be reincarnated into something else or maybe even the same person.
This is just libtards + the modern day (((Sanhedrin)))’s way of shitting on him barely under the radar hiding behind (pseudo) science to do it via this ugly fuck portrayal.
According to several different NDE experiencers who did not see it beforehand, what he actually looks like is Akiane’s Prince of Peace painting.
View: https://youtu.be/cHWouIrvwSg?si=i0teiGqIn5Ta03ad
Last edited:
Exactely, jewish priesthood and herodian monarchy were viewed extremly negatively by this period and every sunday a new messianic claimant apeared. Jesus just was luckly enough to have paul comd later and make an actual religion out of him.
Someone who knows their shit.
Apocalyptic Jewish preachers were all the rage in the First Century, for obvious reasons. Jews were sick of living under Roman Occupation, and Romans, equally, were getting sick of Jewish bullshit. Temple Judaism (Hebrewism?) was all but a dead religion, carried on by the carcass of the religious authorities who had sold out their people to suck off the Romans for money/power/status/a comfy life.
Mang you know your history. The christians wanted to destroy paganism, but for da j000z they wanted indeed to keep them as an example of an unworthy people, thus their treatment was horrid but diffrenet than that of pagans. I belive st augustine goes on a few rants about that.
Yea basically just this lol.
I know this is basically a shitpost, but I feel like it’s a good opportunity to mention that we have basically no concrete evidence that Jesus existed, let alone what he looked like. This is probably just what the average poor person in that time and place looked like.
The accepted theory is that “Yeshua of Nazareth” almost certainly existed in some form, but we really don’t know for sure beyond that. The only real evidence we have of him existing is that it would be unusual for a “cult” to develop centered around a purely fictional character who allegedly lived only 40 years beforehand. More likely that he was real in at least some capacity.
I do appreciate your commentary. It is insightful. However, I have just now noticed that you are indeed a Joo, and so, I must ask, do you denounce circumcision as barbaric genital mutilation that should be outlawed across the whole Earth?
I am a j00. I do agree its an outdated practice, and its unfortunate that my people, muslims and plenty of christians continue it
I do appreciate your commentary. It is insightful. However, I have just now noticed that you are indeed a Joo, and so, I must ask, do you denounce circumcision as barbaric genital mutilation that should be outlawed across the whole Earth?
My condolences to your foreskin, brother. May we be made whole again in the next life.
My condolences to your foreskin, brother. May we be made whole again in the next life.
Hahahahaha
Jewy thing
Conjecture and speculation.
We have no way of knowing what Jesus looked like.
The romans probably killed him because he was a truecel
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
