Serious The same arguments in favour of LGBT are applicable to us

[IncelKing]

With regards to homosexuals, society was brainwashed to accept them because apparently gays and lesbians were BORN THAT WAY, so it was wrong to discriminate against them for something they didn't choose. However, ugly males are discriminated on the basis of looks continuously throughout their lives even though they were also BORN THAT WAY and had no control over the appearance which was designated to them at birth through genetics. IF FAGGOTS AND DYKES ARE ACCEPTED FOR THE WAY THEY WERE BORN (WHICH WAS OUT OF THEIR CONTROL) THEN WE SHOULD ALSO BE ACCEPTED FOR THE WAY WE WERE BORN (WHICH WAS OUT OF OUR CONTROL)

Likewise, society is accepting of trannies as the general consensus is that trannies were born in the "WRONG BODIES". So why is it that incels are not deemed to have been born in the "WRONG BODIES" (non-chad bodies). A male can identify as a female and he will be treated like a female by society. Then why can't an incel identify as a chad, consequently being able to experience romance/sex from females but MOST IMPORTANTLY, THE FEELING OF BEING TREATED WITH BASIC RESPECT, a right of every human being. TRANNIES ARE ABLE TO REAP THE BENEFITS OF IDENTIFYING AS SOMETHING THEY'RE NOT, WHEREAS WE ARE UNABLE TO DO THE SAME.

Anybody else see these double-standards?

 

[Invalidusername]

NT supremacists don't care about low status men. Society couldn't give a shit about them. We are disposable worker ants who are expected to stay quiet and keep slaving away. Low status + ugly men are the one group throughout the ages that majority of anyone ever just doesn't give a shit about.

You'll get some normans virtue signalling for other groups as long as it benefits their social status (good example here is the gays), but when a low status + ugly male voices his suffering its instantly dismissed and even demeaned to the point of never being voiced again.

Remember one thing about NT supremacists: they'll do whatever if it benefits their social status

You think they'll get anything for raising awareness for how bad a low status + ugly male has it?? In their heads they'd perceive such an association as demeaning their own social status, the one thing they vehemently care about. You're talking about the same people who would throw you under a bus for even a crumb of social status boost. These people will go through lengths to differentiate themselves from the low status whilst associating with their norman peers, feeding off their approval for being a fellow norman.

It's just all so depressing to be dehumanised

 

[Deleted member 17599]

I don't want to be compared to the LGBTQIA+ bullshit. Unlike them, we have real problems. They are just mentally ill. The only reason they are accepted is because they are degenerate to society.

NT supremacists don't care about low status men.

This. Normies only care about LGBTQIA+ because they are soyboys who are brainwashed by media to do so. The Jews who own the media hate men though (which is why they want to turn men into cucks and faggots). Therefore they see it as a good thing if ugly, short and autistic men are oppressed.

 

[josh]

Being ugly is a choice.

 

[Subhuman Gamercel]

-Mid to low value men are more numerous than LGTB. And we are gonna be more probably in coming years.
-They have sex and relationships almost effortlestly. At least in what I have seen.

 

[littlemanhikicel]

Being ugly is a choice.

It's not a choice man.

 

[IncelKing]

I don't want to be compared to the LGBTQIA+ bullshit. Unlike them, we have real problems. They are just mentally ill. The only reason they are accepted is because they are degenerate to society.


This. Normies only care about LGBTQIA+ because they are soyboys who are brainwashed by media to do so. The Jews who own the media hate men though (which is why they want to turn men into cucks and faggots). Therefore they see it as a good thing if ugly, short and autistic men are oppressed.

I'm only comparing us to LGBT to highlight the hypocrisy that the reason given by normies for accepting them is the same reason we should also be accepted, which is not the case. So normies have clear double-standards.

 

[BrendioEEE]

Most of them weren't born that way tho, JFL, also most Incels are Incels because of the degenerate environments they live in.

 

[Deleted member 17599]

I'm only comparing us to LGBT to highlight the hypocrisy that the reason given by normies for accepting them is the same reason we should also be accepted, which is not the case. So normies have clear double-standards.

We should be accepted but not them tbh.

 

[IncelKing]

Most of them weren't born that way tho, JFL, also most Incels are Incels because of the degenerate environments they live in.

100%. They're accepted for something which they had a choice in, while we're rejected for something we didn't have a choice in. Clown world.

We should be accepted but not them tbh.

Exactly right, considering the fact that they AREN'T actually born gay but rather it's a choice, whereas no one chose to be ugly. This just makes it even more absurd and unbelievable.

 

[IncelKing]

-Mid to low value men are more numerous than LGTB. And we are gonna be more probably in coming years.
-They have sex and relationships almost effortlestly. At least in what I have seen.

Homos were only oppressed and ostracized long ago in the past. Nowadays if you're a homo, people worship you for being so courageous and brave, even though they face absolutely no opposition or suppression from society. Quite the contrary, they are encouraged and supported.

It's ugly men in the present who are facing the same discrimination that homos experienced in the past. Where's our acceptance?

NT supremacists don't care about low status men. Society couldn't give a shit about them. We are disposable worker ants who are expected to stay quiet and keep slaving away. Low status + ugly men are the one group throughout the ages that majority of anyone ever just doesn't give a shit about.

You'll get some normans virtue signalling for other groups as long as it benefits their social status (good example here is the gays), but when a low status + ugly male voices his suffering its instantly dismissed and even demeaned to the point of never being voiced again.

Remember one thing about NT supremacists: they'll do whatever if it benefits their social status

You think they'll get anything for raising awareness for how bad a low status + ugly male has it?? In their heads they'd perceive such an association as demeaning their own social status, the one thing they vehemently care about. You're talking about the same people who would throw you under a bus for even a crumb of social status boost. These people will go through lengths to differentiate themselves from the low status whilst associating with their norman peers, feeding off their approval for being a fellow norman.

It's just all so depressing to be dehumanised

High IQ. Treating low status men like shit elevates norman's own status. If everyone is treated equally, then everyone's status is equal which makes status an arbitrary concept, because the concept of status is derived from humans existing on a hierarchy of "importance" which determines the level of respect they are entitled. Some people need to be treated worse than others for a hierarchy of societal importance/value to be established, which results in the concept of status being introduced.

 

[Deleted member 2686]

Yeah

also I noticed that with LGBT, many ppl ikr that were straight in the past just decide to change orientation for no reason

this is proof that this is just a snowflake olympics, outspecialiying themselves to the point of retardation

 

[TheReaper]

what's the point of being accepted?
it's unrelated to getting pussy and I don't give a fuck about what they think.

 

[happiless]

You're right, but normies disagree because we just need to lift weights and shower and be friendly bro.