Discussion The richer the country the worse the women.

[Shinichi]

It's very obvious that there's a link between the wealth/ lack thereof in a country and how feminist it is. America is the richest country on the planet and we are the epicenter of degenerate sexually depraved and liberated women running around causing chaos. Now contrast Dad with countries in the Middle East where people live in tents yet. If a woman so much thinks of having it unpure thought they will be executed. It makes sense that poor countries do this since they don't have the resources to allow their women to have any economic freedom. They have to adhere to a more conservative societal system where the man is above the woman. Even in Latin American countries where they a far more loose view on female sexuality still has a conservative, woman obeys man, type of dynamic. However, my question is that if it's possible to have a prosperous first world country that doesn't have feminism? Are they truly joined at the hip? Just having any type of national wealth automatically turn women into cunts?

 

[InvoluntaryRetarded]

having Cuckstianity does that

 

[BlackCel_from_ZA]

No GDP for female nature
No borders for female nature
No patriotism for female nature.

FOids will always be foids regardless of how wealthy their country is

 

[wonderful_world]

No GDP for female nature
No borders for female nature
No patriotism for female nature.

FOids will always be foids regardless of how wealthy their country is

“Female nature” is cope, modern foids are the way they are because of modern society and brainwashing not muh nature, women of the past were much different. Legit room temperature iq to deny this

 

[prajeet88]

having Cuckstianity does that

Your religion should be the one that best represents your race at it's most purest form. Christianity is a fine religion for sands. Jews have the closest spiritual link to their religion, its beliefs perfectly reflecting their national character.

 

[BlackCel_from_ZA]

“Female nature” is cope, modern foids are the way they are because of modern society and brainwashing not muh nature, women of the past were much different. Legit room temperature iq to deny this

Keep coping nigger, I just know you're a fucking soy and fakecel because you used the word "women" like they aren't cum dumpsters for my SIC.

Foids were always the same, it's just that circumstances led them to behave differently. They couldn't be promiscious because of being judged but there were whores throughout history you stupid fag. Foids couldn't work so they needed to settle with the betabuxxers to survive, if they had the luxury of creating OFs or fucking chads, they would certainly do that regardless of the time period.

You're lucky I responded to you, you filthy 2025cel. You were a waste of my keystrokes and time. Fuck you and you're fakecel ways jfl

 

[wonderful_world]

Keep coping nigger, I just know you're a fucking soy and fakecel because you used the word "women" like they aren't cum dumpsters for my SIC.

Foids were always the same, it's just that circumstances led them to behave differently. They couldn't be promiscious because of being judged but there were whores throughout history you stupid fag. Foids couldn't work so they needed to settle with the betabuxxers to survive, if they had the luxury of creating OFs or fucking chads, they would certainly do that regardless of the time period.

You're lucky I responded to you, you filthy 2025cel. You were a waste of my keystrokes and time. Fuck you and you're fakecel ways jfl

Holy fuck… how are you even alive? This is advanced mental retardation.

I’m a fakecel but I’m not an absolute sub 60 iq retard like you who thinks a foid born in 1920 is the same as one born in 2005.

 

[Adolf Kitler]

“Female nature” is cope, modern foids are the way they are because of modern society and brainwashing not muh nature, women of the past were much different. Legit room temperature iq to deny this

Holy shit you're coping hard LMAO

 

[Cryotron]

still has a conservative, woman obeys man, type of dynamic

Doubt

 

[DieVoGel]

It's very obvious that there's a link between the wealth/ lack thereof in a country and how feminist it is. America is the richest country on the planet and we are the epicenter of degenerate sexually depraved and liberated women running around causing chaos. Now contrast Dad with countries in the Middle East where people live in tents yet. If a woman so much thinks of having it unpure thought they will be executed. It makes sense that poor countries do this since they don't have the resources to allow their women to have any economic freedom. They have to adhere to a more conservative societal system where the man is above the woman. Even in Latin American countries where they a far more loose view on female sexuality still has a conservative, woman obeys man, type of dynamic. However, my question is that if it's possible to have a prosperous first world country that doesn't have feminism? Are they truly joined at the hip? Just having any type of national wealth automatically turn women into cunts?

Women are always cunts but in poorer countries there is more of a sense of community and women are more subservient to men which is what nature wants but in wealthy countries women are more independent and disconnected from the order of nature, thus it results in showing their true cunt nature.

 

[BlackCel_from_ZA]

Holy fuck… how are you even alive? This is advanced mental retardation.

I’m a fakecel but I’m not an absolute sub 60 iq retard like you who thinks a foid born in 1920 is the same as one born in 2005.

kek eat shit fakecel

 

[Cincel]

It's very obvious that there's a link between the wealth/ lack thereof in a country and how feminist it is. America is the richest country on the planet and we are the epicenter of degenerate sexually depraved and liberated women running around causing chaos. Now contrast Dad with countries in the Middle East where people live in tents yet. If a woman so much thinks of having it unpure thought they will be executed. It makes sense that poor countries do this since they don't have the resources to allow their women to have any economic freedom. They have to adhere to a more conservative societal system where the man is above the woman. Even in Latin American countries where they a far more loose view on female sexuality still has a conservative, woman obeys man, type of dynamic. However, my question is that if it's possible to have a prosperous first world country that doesn't have feminism? Are they truly joined at the hip? Just having any type of national wealth automatically turn women into cunts?

This not only applies to countries but also specific communities or zones.

I have seen for example within my own city the "wealthy" zone is full of normfags on fancy cars acting like assholes and foidlets doing what foids know better, waste money and time.

Also they are more mean in general, feel superior but all of them just got the money by inheritance so they are useless pieces of shit who are not capable of use their brains or know whats hard work.

 

[Only_Perspective]

>they used to be trad and shit
>cuntoids back then

 

[manletcel1488]

Mouse utopia, we aren't supposed to live in a post scarcity environment.
I think with the right authoritarian regime it might be possible to have the best of both worlds, but the concept of liberalism has to be completely abolished.

 

[AssyrianCel]

having Cuckstianity does that

 

[Grodd]

FOids will always be foids regardless of how wealthy their country is

 

[ThanostheGOAT]

It's very obvious that there's a link between the wealth/ lack thereof in a country and how feminist it is. America is the richest country on the planet and we are the epicenter of degenerate sexually depraved and liberated women running around causing chaos. Now contrast Dad with countries in the Middle East where people live in tents yet. If a woman so much thinks of having it unpure thought they will be executed. It makes sense that poor countries do this since they don't have the resources to allow their women to have any economic freedom. They have to adhere to a more conservative societal system where the man is above the woman. Even in Latin American countries where they a far more loose view on female sexuality still has a conservative, woman obeys man, type of dynamic. However, my question is that if it's possible to have a prosperous first world country that doesn't have feminism? Are they truly joined at the hip? Just having any type of national wealth automatically turn women into cunts?

Generally true liberalism and conservatism and basically any ism lol destroys women

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Nah, gotta disagree on this. Female nature is the same everywhere, just because poorfag women in third world shitholes want to present themselves as "pure untainted tradwives" to rich Western passport bro incels to use them to get out of their shitholes doesn't mean they actually are like that.

It makes sense that poor countries do this since they don't have the resources to allow their women to have any economic freedom. They have to adhere to a more conservative societal system where the man is above the woman.

Meanwhile...

Over 60% of the Kenyan men surveyed reported their female partners were controlling. Compared with those who did not, men who reported controlling behaviours were significantly more likely to have experienced three types of violence (physical, sexual and emotional).

In modern times, 33.5% of married men in Kenya have been victims of physical domestic violence (Kigaya, 2021) According to Gathogo (2015), in the Central region of Kenya alone, by 2012 there had been 300,000 cases of domestic violence against men.

In most Arab countries (Yemen, Libya, Tunisia, Palestine, Iraq, Jordan, Sudan, and Algeria) men were more likely to be victims of domestic violence than women (Bouhlila, 2019)

"Just thirdworldmaxx bro, women there are traditional and loyal and obedient and feminine" copers destroyed by stats and logic.

Title:feelsjuice:. In modern times, 33.5% of married men in Kenya have been victims of physical domestic violence (Kigaya, 2021) According to Gathogo (2015), in the Central region of Kenya alone, by 2012 there had been 300,000 cases of domestic violence against men. In most Arab countries...

incels.is

Holy fuck… how are you even alive? This is advanced mental retardation.

I’m a fakecel but I’m not an absolute sub 60 iq retard like you who thinks a foid born in 1920 is the same as one born in 2005.

>1920
>2005

Nigga, we have comedies from fucking Ancient Greece making fun of old roasties who put on tons of makeup to still look sexually attractive in their 50s and above, and that's coming from one of the most "misogynistic" societies ever seen in Europe, if not the entire Eurasia.

>they used to be trad and shit
>cuntoids back then
View attachment 1372109

Saved.

No GDP for female nature
No borders for female nature
No patriotism for female nature.

FOids will always be foids regardless of how wealthy their country is

 

[Shaktiman]

Richness has nothing to do with worser women.Gulf arab women have less rights than the average pajeeta living in india

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

Nope, You're wrong. The real correlation is the higher percentage of simps that exist in a country the worse the women of that country are. Simping enables the worst behaviors in women. Though typically more wealthier countries have a higher simping rate, it does not correlate exactly to the wealthyness of a country, Canadian women are just as bad as american women despite the fact that America is way more wealthy than Canada is.

 

[MayorWest]

Hello Shinichi,

I agree with your analysis of the country's level of wealth and the chaotic state of relationships between men and women. I have my own thoughts on the matter, and if you'd like to read them, here they are:

Women are physically weaker and can become pregnant, a period during which they are very vulnerable. Since the dawn of time, they have been inclined to be with men who protect them. The union between men and women is, first and foremost, a bond of necessity: one takes care of the hard, external, and risky physical tasks, while the other is protected indoors and takes care of the children.

Now, let's talk about the development of society and technology. Men, who traditionally took care of the external tasks, have built numerous machines: for transportation, farming, creating other machines, communication, and more. In "advanced" societies, most jobs that require physical strength no longer exist. And here’s where the unexpected happens: women no longer need men. Technological comfort destroys the necessity of the bond between men and women.

However, women still need to feel protected, and men are no longer synonymous with protection; women are financially and physically autonomous. Men, on the other hand, still need to feel like protectors but no longer have that role either.

Is there a solution? Yes, I think so, and I’ll write a post about it soon! We, men, have always built tools to solve problems. It’s what we’ve been doing since the dawn of time. Very modern tools could help restore the emotional needs of both men and women.