Traditional sexual morals were aligned with monogamy, anti-fornication, heterosexuality and long-term partnership (until death of at least one of the partners). This was reinforced by cultures and laws relating to Abrahamic religions (Islam, Christianity) that ruled over people in Europe and North America. The sexual morals of Europe and North America were redefined through the Sexual Revolution of the 1960's and 1970's
As consequence of the Sexual Revolution, a new sexual morality was introduced, which endorsed polyamory, promiscuity, fornication, homosexuality, transexuality, and adultery. The Sexual Revolution was very much carried out as a feminist movement. New codes of sexual behaviour were endorsed via the Sexual Revolution, which aligned with the interests of neoliberal women that didnt want to be confined to traditional expectations of the female parent in nuclear families
Traditional sexual values became the old morality of European and North American countries. Neoliberal sexual values are the new morality. Morality has to do with the concept of justice and farness. I thought about how normies and women attempt to rationalize their sexual choices. The question of whether is it right or wrong to commit adultery, or to be homosexual, or to have sexual relations with other people outside of wedlock...
I think there's no regard for justice in the moralization of human behaviour. Human morality is arbitrary and self-serving at its core
There may be a fabrication of justice to keep up with social expectations, but in practice, justice will not have effect in the decisions made by normies and women, because normies and women generally have stronger motivations than a mere pursuit for justice.
Normies and women will do what they want, whenever it suits them, and if they cannot find a way to demonstrate that their actions are fair and just, they will either:
(a) mock or villanize the people who have been negatively affected by their unfair and unjustifiable actions (e.g. victim shaming, or claiming they aren't entitled to fair treatment, or portraying them as a threat to society rather than a victim of systemic dysfunctionality), OR
(b) they will assert self-righteousness on the pretense of power (i.e. might is right)
TLDR: Human sexuality was remoralized by replacing traditional values with neoliberal values. Normies and women do not truly pursue justice when trying to moralize a certain action or desire. Human morality is essentially self-serving and arbitrary
Normies and women will endorse or criticize things as they see fit. If it suits the foid / normie more to approve of something today, they'll approve it. Moreover, if it suits the foid / normie more to denounce the same thing tomorrow, they'll denounce it
As consequence of the Sexual Revolution, a new sexual morality was introduced, which endorsed polyamory, promiscuity, fornication, homosexuality, transexuality, and adultery. The Sexual Revolution was very much carried out as a feminist movement. New codes of sexual behaviour were endorsed via the Sexual Revolution, which aligned with the interests of neoliberal women that didnt want to be confined to traditional expectations of the female parent in nuclear families
Traditional sexual values became the old morality of European and North American countries. Neoliberal sexual values are the new morality. Morality has to do with the concept of justice and farness. I thought about how normies and women attempt to rationalize their sexual choices. The question of whether is it right or wrong to commit adultery, or to be homosexual, or to have sexual relations with other people outside of wedlock...
I think there's no regard for justice in the moralization of human behaviour. Human morality is arbitrary and self-serving at its core
There may be a fabrication of justice to keep up with social expectations, but in practice, justice will not have effect in the decisions made by normies and women, because normies and women generally have stronger motivations than a mere pursuit for justice.
Normies and women will do what they want, whenever it suits them, and if they cannot find a way to demonstrate that their actions are fair and just, they will either:
(a) mock or villanize the people who have been negatively affected by their unfair and unjustifiable actions (e.g. victim shaming, or claiming they aren't entitled to fair treatment, or portraying them as a threat to society rather than a victim of systemic dysfunctionality), OR
(b) they will assert self-righteousness on the pretense of power (i.e. might is right)
TLDR: Human sexuality was remoralized by replacing traditional values with neoliberal values. Normies and women do not truly pursue justice when trying to moralize a certain action or desire. Human morality is essentially self-serving and arbitrary
Normies and women will endorse or criticize things as they see fit. If it suits the foid / normie more to approve of something today, they'll approve it. Moreover, if it suits the foid / normie more to denounce the same thing tomorrow, they'll denounce it
Last edited:
