Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The relationship between democracy and feminism (how men became second-class citizens)

Black Soul

Black Soul

Incel suicide worldwide
★★
Joined
Jun 30, 2020
Posts
4,709
1) The democratic system establishes that what the majority says is legitimate and must be enforceable, regardless of its effects on the minority.

2) In the past, some intelligent women understood the democratic electoral system and realized that the number of women is large and therefore if they get the right to vote they can pass the policies that enable them getting great benefits. This is what happened throughout the 20th century and an example of that is the 19th amendment in 1919 which gives American women the right to vote.

3) Before women got the right to vote, men always voted for the good of "family", while when women got the right to vote they sought from the first moment to vote only for their own interests as a group, because feminism have enhanced their awareness of their identity vs men.

What happened after that and we are suffering from its consequences until now was that men continued in self-denial to vote for the family! (Family = women + children), and they didn't develop any awareness of new reality or awareness of their interests like women did. Of course, feminists have exploited men's stupidity to gain more and more privileges slowly over the decades.

I think this is one of the most important reasons that there is no political representation of men’s rights in the world. It can be compared to the mechanism of natural selection. If your male ancestors didn't put any evolutionary pressure on the political system to take into account their rights and interests, how do you expect the political system to evolve to take care of them?! What happened was the opposite with women, There was evolutionary pressure (by women and men) to achieve feminist demands.

If we take America as an example, then it is not surprising that both the Democratic and Republican parties are feminists, no wonder that politicians, media and companies are feminists, this is what popular demands for many decades. That's also explains why men became soy and beta by the time; it was a survival mechanism because there is no political representation for them, and not socially acceptable except being submissive to women.
 
Yes, it is crazy to say men are equal to women. Like saying dogs are equal to cats.
 
Democracy is cucked especially if everyone can vote as it allows degenerates to control society because majority are degenerates
 
Democracy is cucked especially if everyone can vote as it allows degenerates to control society because majority are degenerates
This is what happened, the degenerates control our society, media and education.
 
Democracy is cucked especially if everyone can vote as it allows degenerates to control society because majority are degenerates
Agreed, fuck democracy
 
No system of government empowers the stupid and the selfish more then democracy does.

The only real solution is a monarchy led by a redpilled mentalcel.
 
I think its obvious at this point the women shouldn't be allowed to vote. Previous empires and civilizations either knew this already or had to find out the hard way. If we continue down this path we're on the only possible outcomes are either complete socialism and dictatorship(which is what the powers-that-be want) or the downfall of civilization.
 
The only real solution is a monarchy led by a redpilled mentalcel.
I see that the way of thinking when we can't solve our problems in the present and then go back to the past to borrow a solution is unwise and there are doubts about its effectiveness.
Imo, returning to monarchy makes bad worse.
 
I see that the way of thinking when we can't solve our problems in the present and then go back to the past to borrow a solution is unwise and there are doubts about its effectiveness.
Imo, returning to monarchy makes bad worse.
Well democracy and oligarchy are the only other options from monarchy.

The good thing about monarchy is that it is hereditary. We know at this point that personality and ideology are about 50% rooted in genetics. A monarchy led by the wrong people could end up being bad. A monarchy led by one of our own, on the other hand, could be a great thing.
 
Well democracy and oligarchy are the only other options from monarchy.

[UWSL]untrue.[/UWSL]
The good thing about monarchy is that it is hereditary.
It's not a good thing, read history.
We know at this point that personality and ideology are about 50% rooted in genetics. A monarchy led by the wrong people could end up being bad.
so you admit that the monarchy is chad worship, then the blackpill can be used to give him more legitimacy.
No, we don't want that :feelswhat:
A monarchy led by one of our own, on the other hand, could be a great thing.
cope :feelskek:
 
[UWSL]untrue.[/UWSL]

It's not a good thing, read history.

so you admit that the monarchy is chad worship, then the blackpill can be used to give him more legitimacy.
No, we don't want that :feelswhat:

cope :feelskek:
I didn't say it was chad worship, I do think in the wrong hands it could be bad, but that applies to anything.

Lenin turned Russia, which was a highly traditional monarchy into an extreme left society with levels of degeneracy putting the 1960s hippies to shame within a matter of years. Millions of children were out on the streets because there was so much promiscuity.

The US is basically the left-wing version of Russia in 1910. It is possible for incels to create a new government, it would obviously be very difficult but it is possible. If you install a monarch, bring back religious theocracy, eliminate government handouts and programs that act as women's providers, outlaw pre-marital sex (unless its paid for), bring back arranged marriage, you will get one woman for every man.

It worked for centuries, no reason it can't work now.
 
I didn't say it was chad worship, I do think in the wrong hands it could be bad, but that applies to anything.
There will always be wrong hands, history confirms that.
Lenin turned Russia, which was a highly traditional monarchy into an extreme left society with levels of degeneracy putting the 1960s hippies to shame within a matter of years. Millions of children were out on the streets because there was so much promiscuity.
This is your personal opinion. Imo, Lenin was a great reformer of Russia.
The US is basically the left-wing version of Russia in 1910. It is possible for incels to create a new government, it would obviously be very difficult but it is possible. If you install a monarch, bring back religious theocracy, eliminate government handouts and programs that act as women's providers, outlaw pre-marital sex (unless its paid for), bring back arranged marriage, you will get one woman for every man.

It worked for centuries, no reason it can't work now.
Just go back to the middle ages, bro :soy::redpill:
 
2) In the past, some intelligent women understood the democratic electoral system and realized that the number of women is large and therefore if they get the right to vote they can pass the policies that enable them getting great benefits.
Women did not understand shit.

They were given the power to work/earn money and vote because rich assholes understood that women are:

-the perfect consumer, easily manipulated into buying useless and overpriced shit (an then the moan about the pink-tax)

-the perfect voter-sheeples, always voting for whatever is popular at the time (Hitler then, Left now)

-the perfect government-bitch, forever depended on the state and its various programs, never attempting to gain independence


Democracy + female freedom = Slavery
 
You are a damn fag, pre-Soviet Russia was an absolute monarchy based traditionalist, the communist fags led by Lenin were one of the most important milestones of the world's soybeanization. [UWSL][UWSL](And finally opened the doors to the domination of the world by the Jews)[/UWSL][/UWSL]


:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:



[UWSL][UWSL]You are a fucking fag communist and a tranny infiltrator, I strongly hope you get banned.[/UWSL][/UWSL]
I replied to you here and also don't start a big drama again :feelsseriously:
 
This is why we need right-wing fascism that will take this stupid "feminism" and sweep it out to the dumpster. Put power back into the hands of men where it belongs. Where it doesn't get abused quite as often.

Agreed, fuck democracy
Hear, hear! :dab:
 
maybe best system would be only educated(blackpill education certifcation) men voting. also specialists in certain industry should be able to directly vote on laws that affect their group.
 
You are a damn fag, pre-Soviet Russia was an absolute monarchy based traditionalist, the communist fags led by Lenin were one of the most important milestones of the world's soybeanization. [UWSL][UWSL](And finally opened the doors to the domination of the world by the Jews)[/UWSL][/UWSL]


:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:



[UWSL][UWSL]You are a fucking fag communist and a tranny infiltrator, I strongly hope you get banned.[/UWSL][/UWSL]
Based.
 
Politics was used as a weapon by the people above to subvert men into soyboys it wasnt feminism itself becuase woman are naturally more submissive it is impossible for them to make a movement such as feminism without the help of a higher power that allowed it to happen
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
3
Views
186
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
Buried Alive 2.0
Replies
42
Views
1K
SmhChan
SmhChan
Buried Alive 2.0
Replies
10
Views
571
Friezacel
Friezacel
sultryloser
Replies
44
Views
2K
Nagger
Nagger

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top