I think that it shouldn't be demonized. A large percentage of males want to rape, so one who does shouldn't be imagined as deviant or using a sexually unnatural method, even if you yourself are one of the also substantial number of males not with any significant arousal to rape. You should also realize that you will be much more likely to rape in the event that the opportunity presents itself to you than you will imagine yourself as being without such opportunity present, as one can ascertain simply by looking at the history of war rape and statements of many of the soldier participants indicating their surprise at acting differently than they imagined they would.
en.wikipedia.org
A documentary book,
War's Unwomanly Face by
Svetlana Alexievich includes memories by Soviet veterans about their experience in Germany.
[35] According to a former army officer: "We were young, strong, and four years without women. So we tried to catch German women and ... Ten men raped one girl. There were not enough women; the entire population run from the Soviet Army. So we had to take young, twelve or thirteen year-old. If she cried, we put something into her mouth. We thought it was fun. Now I can not understand how I did it. A boy from a good family... But that was me."
[36]
A common sentiment among such people, who I certainly don't hold any particular animosity toward, even as not thinking females ought to be raped either. I like rape themes to fantasy and have desire for rape, as is common:
Indicates that the majority of males -- at least from a sample of students at university -- fantasize about sexual assault behaviors, with perhaps a little less than a quarter of them having manifested sexual assault behaviors. Certainly one simply cannot demonize nearly a quarter of males, and presuming even that only some of such males are arrested it is certainly not at all just to demonize a small subset of people for what a much larger group is doing without trouble ever befalling them.
Part of the issue is that the radical feminists both condemn things like pornography use and prostitution, all the while complaining about rape. They are similar to creationists in that they reference a false reality regarding matters of sex and simply deactivate their logical and rational brain networks in response to the matter. So-called feminist theory is more properly considered something analogous to religion than a valid science, and is by and large a laughable abomination, having little valid presence in a scholarly setting. It denies and competes with established sciences like evolutionary biology, and this renders it as comparable to teaching creation science.
A protest in Toronto last weekend against sexual assault stereotypes, affectionately called the “Sluts March”, reminded me that I have omitted (or perhaps avoided) talking about rape here on Dollars […]
bigthink.com
It may seem like the relationship between internet access and rape is spurious, but evidence suggests that even after controlling for known determinants of rape rates (such as policing, urbanization, poverty and the age distributions), a 10% increase in internet access coincides with a fall in rape rates of 7.3%. *
With 88,097 rapes in the US in 2009, this suggests that if 81% of US homes had internet access 6,437 fewer women would report being raped every year. Once you take into consideration unreported rapes that figure will be much higher.
The argument given in this particular paper is that porn and rape are, in the economic sense, substitutes. Two "goods" are substitutes when the price of one good falls, the demand for that good increases relative to the other good.
When Rhode Island accidentally legalized prostitution, rape decreased sharply
Such feminists who are against prostitution, against pornography, and so on, are extreme expressions of guarder female phenotype. They compete with satellite females who drain the economic resources of their partners by having morality campaigns against the abominable whores and throwing them into church indoctrination centers.
A moralistic program in Phoenix arrests sex workers in massive raids and brings them to a church, where they are held extrajudicially and offered alternative sentences without lawyers, judges, or due process.
www.vice.com
Project ROSE is a Phoenix city program that arrests sex workers in the name of saving them. In five two-day stings, more than 100 police officers targeted alleged sex workers on the street and online. They brought them in handcuffs to the Bethany Bible Church. There, the sex workers were forced to meet with prosecutors, detectives, and representatives of Project ROSE, who offered a diversion program to those who qualified. Those who did not may face months or years in jail.
This works to your detriment as satellite males, for you use such methodologies as fucking prostitutes and jacking off to pornography yourselves oftentimes. Guarder males are less likely to do these things because of being so reputation oriented. One of your primary sexual enemies is the guarder females, for unless you are one of the rarer fitter satellite males, already being part of the much rarer satellite male group, they aren't going to have interest in mating with you unless you use mimicry most likely to signal being a fitter satellite male or guarder male, for guarders tend to do better, and guarder females will guard higher quality mates from you in the process of guarding their guarded mates from them, for they use the legal system and fits of moral outrage to actuate their sexual strategies.
However, I also have sympathy for females, and feel that primarily rape should be addressed by having prostitution, pornography, and other substitutes for sex, with such things also having no stigma attached to them to the extent that can be done. There will still be some rape left, and I still will not be particularly condemning of such massively grey shaded behaviors, to a good degree of into darker shades of such even. Still, I aim to avoid such things and have success in doing so without having any failure regarding such matters, and although I am against having egregious penalties for such things that aren't progressed egregiously into darker shades toward black -- and certainly am against pretending as if such behaviors are even manifestations of particular deviance -- I certainly can't imagine supporting the actual legalization or decriminalization of the rape of any class of people.
