There was a thread, sometime ago. I lost it and i'd be grateful if someone knows what i'm referring to and points me to it.
It was basically a very accurate paper written by some sociologist about why you will NEVER hear or read something like "yes, you are ugly, so you wll not be selected for your genes but, at best, for resources/emotional support". Unless it's an incel forum. I wish i could be more precise, but the core was a very nicely-worded explanation on why your peers, at any costs, wants to WISH that you can have a chance to be like them even if you can't be and it's not even your fault.
It came to my mind because, as usual, i was reading IT users answers to one of my featured posts (the one that compares sex with foods, it seems it had a lot of "success" in their subreddit). Aside from the mindless usual drones that try to berate my point by being fussy or simply clueless, there are ones like "hurr durr i've got a degree in sociologism so anti social behaviour is taken out from the gene pool because durr durr you can put your community at risk".
I mean, let's just believe this guy, he has got a fucking DEGREE about sociologism yet he has no idea that ugly guy is taken out the gene pool because he is FUCKING UGLY. It's surely incredible: people like these could be your therapist, your teacher, whatever. It's seriously something.
Or, maybe, they're not picturing a truecel but, instead, a low-tier normie that is incel due to mental problems, and they are right that he, somehow, could get a girlfriend.
But like women do not want to settle, neither do we. My analogy with the "awful dish" that an incel gets to eat once a month is simple: if you are lucky, you will find a low smv woman that is settling with you, a woman that is not that good and has probably taken a lot of big dicks. My last sentence sounds something silly, but a fullifing relationship is based about mutual lust and love, not because we have to settle with each other and, during that, he would have sex with her anyways while she (due to the nature of a woman) would probably be unsatisfied and likely cheat on him.
We do not want that. If you are fat cucks with beards and you're fine with this, your problem. We are true men, the real deal (aside, unluckily, for our face), we want to have a REAL relationship based on attraction (or a lot of casual sex, if you wish).
Also, every time they feature they call us idiots, morons etc etc (even if our posts are somewhat neutral), they say we do not make any effort in improving us.
IT users, i'm a 30+ male which is more fit that the majority of his peers, i'm not very muscular, but i can run and i can fight, because i put effort in improving, trying -at first- to compensat for my ugliness and then doing only to remain sane. I could likely injure you in a fight, if not kill you. You are probably the same fat stubby shitheads i see at work, with their "beta girlfriend" and in the ends they always end up breaking up and the fat cuck has no idea why.
It was basically a very accurate paper written by some sociologist about why you will NEVER hear or read something like "yes, you are ugly, so you wll not be selected for your genes but, at best, for resources/emotional support". Unless it's an incel forum. I wish i could be more precise, but the core was a very nicely-worded explanation on why your peers, at any costs, wants to WISH that you can have a chance to be like them even if you can't be and it's not even your fault.
It came to my mind because, as usual, i was reading IT users answers to one of my featured posts (the one that compares sex with foods, it seems it had a lot of "success" in their subreddit). Aside from the mindless usual drones that try to berate my point by being fussy or simply clueless, there are ones like "hurr durr i've got a degree in sociologism so anti social behaviour is taken out from the gene pool because durr durr you can put your community at risk".
I mean, let's just believe this guy, he has got a fucking DEGREE about sociologism yet he has no idea that ugly guy is taken out the gene pool because he is FUCKING UGLY. It's surely incredible: people like these could be your therapist, your teacher, whatever. It's seriously something.
Or, maybe, they're not picturing a truecel but, instead, a low-tier normie that is incel due to mental problems, and they are right that he, somehow, could get a girlfriend.
But like women do not want to settle, neither do we. My analogy with the "awful dish" that an incel gets to eat once a month is simple: if you are lucky, you will find a low smv woman that is settling with you, a woman that is not that good and has probably taken a lot of big dicks. My last sentence sounds something silly, but a fullifing relationship is based about mutual lust and love, not because we have to settle with each other and, during that, he would have sex with her anyways while she (due to the nature of a woman) would probably be unsatisfied and likely cheat on him.
We do not want that. If you are fat cucks with beards and you're fine with this, your problem. We are true men, the real deal (aside, unluckily, for our face), we want to have a REAL relationship based on attraction (or a lot of casual sex, if you wish).
Also, every time they feature they call us idiots, morons etc etc (even if our posts are somewhat neutral), they say we do not make any effort in improving us.
IT users, i'm a 30+ male which is more fit that the majority of his peers, i'm not very muscular, but i can run and i can fight, because i put effort in improving, trying -at first- to compensat for my ugliness and then doing only to remain sane. I could likely injure you in a fight, if not kill you. You are probably the same fat stubby shitheads i see at work, with their "beta girlfriend" and in the ends they always end up breaking up and the fat cuck has no idea why.
