The propulsion of niggers' "rank" in society is disgusting to say the least

[blame77]

Instead of white guilt we should have black gratitude. These filthy niggers should thank white Jesus and kiss the feet of every white man they see on the street. If not for the transatlantic slave trade there wouldn't be "black culture" as we know it. They wouldn't matter in society as much as they do now. "Black culture" would be Shaka Zulu, piracy, poverty, hunger, cannibalism, slavery, and ebola if it wasn't for the white man bringing them to the Land of the Free. Not saying that the current "black culture" is any better than ebola and cannibalism btw.

 

[blame77]

Niggers should be killed en masse

 

[go2sleep]

Niggers should be killed en masse

Wow, that's racist.

 

[Penguin]

racist incel

 

[based_meme]

Is this a reddit, stormfront, or an ADL account?

 

[Friezacel]

Jesus was brown, other than that i agree

 

[MaldireMan0077]

Wow, that's racist.

Wow, no one gives a shit

 

[blame77]

Is this a reddit, stormfront, or an ADL account?

Are you a nigger, kike, or a dalit?

 

[based_meme]

Are you a nigger, kike, or a dalit?

Go back to whatever cesspool you swam out of.

 

[Ihatefaggots]

Instead of white guilt we should have black gratitude. These filthy niggers should thank white Jesus and kiss the feet of every white man they see on the street. If not for the transatlantic slave trade there wouldn't be "black culture" as we know it. They wouldn't matter in society as much as they do now. "Black culture" would be Shaka Zulu, piracy, poverty, hunger, cannibalism, slavery, and ebola if it wasn't for the white man bringing them to the Land of the Free. Not saying that the current "black culture" is any better than ebola and cannibalism btw.

jesus was a jew dumb nigger

 

[go2sleep]

Wow, no one gives a shit

Wow, someone got triggered.

 

[MaldireMan0077]

Wow, someone got triggered.

Im not triggered. Im just being honest.

 

[Abgesang]

Why is this forum in a constant race war sadge.In the end we are all subhuman

 

[CMD]

wrong op even if whites didnt exist china could have advanced to how advanced whites were in 1914 by today aka 2024

japan could have gone even further that that jfl

so even without u guys blacks wouls still have access to trains cars metal warships and electricity jfl

but no offense to u white brocels

 

[Sonicfancel]

Based greycel.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

Niggers are only promoted because white women love them. White women control the West. This is also why racism against curries is perfectly acceptable. White women hate curries.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

wrong op even if whites didnt exist china could have advanced to how advanced whites were in 1914 by today aka 2024

japan could have gone even further that that jfl

so even without u guys blacks wouls still have access to trains cars metal warships and electricity jfl

but no offense to u white brocels

East Asia would have never reached modern tech levels without white people. East Asia has had some of the earliest civilizations in human history but they were permanently trapped in the iron age.

Entire generations came and went with nearly no technological innovation. Dynasties rose and fell, wars, famines, and history unfolded over millennia, yet they were stagnant societies incapable of innovation.

Asians were only awoken from their slumber by whites.

Whites (northern Europeans) have only had civilization for a little over 1000 years. Within a few centuries of becoming civilized, they had surpassed all of Asia, including the Middle East. By 1000 AD, they were ahead of everyone except perhaps China. By 1400 they were leagues above non-whites. Whites only obtained civilization after the fall of the Romans, who were a mixed Mediterranean race.

It's like a guy who never paid attention in school and never studies gets a perfect score while a studycel rice spends all day and night studying only to barely pass.

The strength of whites is that they can reinvent themselves and their civilization is constantly changing.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

East Asia would have never reached modern tech levels without white people. East Asia has had some of the earliest civilizations in human history but they were permanently trapped in the iron age.

Entire generations came and went with nearly no technological innovation. Dynasties rose and fell, wars, famines, and history unfolded over millennia, yet they were stagnant societies incapable of innovation.

Asians were only awoken from their slumber by whites.

Whites (northern Europeans) have only had civilization for a little over 1000 years. Within a few centuries of becoming civilized, they had surpassed all of Asia, including the Middle East. By 1000 AD, they were ahead of everyone except perhaps China. By 1400 they were leagues above non-whites. Whites only obtained civilization after the fall of the Romans, who were a mixed Mediterranean race.

It's like a guy who never paid attention in school and never studies gets a perfect score while a studycel rice spends all day and night studying only to barely pass.

The strength of whites is that they can reinvent themselves and their civilization is constantly changing.

All of this is despite Asians vastly outnumbering white people.

 

[DarkStar]

East Asia would have never reached modern tech levels without white people. East Asia has had some of the earliest civilizations in human history but they were permanently trapped in the iron age.

Entire generations came and went with nearly no technological innovation. Dynasties rose and fell, wars, famines, and history unfolded over millennia, yet they were stagnant societies incapable of innovation.

Asians were only awoken from their slumber by whites.

Whites (northern Europeans) have only had civilization for a little over 1000 years. Within a few centuries of becoming civilized, they had surpassed all of Asia, including the Middle East. By 1000 AD, they were ahead of everyone except perhaps China. By 1400 they were leagues above non-whites. Whites only obtained civilization after the fall of the Romans, who were a mixed Mediterranean race.

It's like a guy who never paid attention in school and never studies gets a perfect score while a studycel rice spends all day and night studying only to barely pass.

The strength of whites is that they can reinvent themselves and their civilization is constantly changing.

Incorrect, Romans were ANF dominant with some Steppe & Natufian in them

Nowadays, modern Italy(North mainly) is mixed with West European, same with South but with Balkan DNA & Greek.

Meds are also White btw.

 

[DarkStar]

Jesus was brown, other than that i agree

I always laugh when people say Christianity is a "White mans religion"

Jfl, that's so not true.

It was literally what led to tons of wars & conflicts in Europe, probably just as destructive, if not more than WWI & WWII

He was technically a Jew, but back then they were more MENA since this was before many left for Europe & later hybridized with Europeans(Meds, Slavs, Balkans, and later Anglos+French+Germans)

And ye OP has a point, though I wouldn't say I want to live in a society where they're still around, since this idea of "gratitude" won't work & is still problematic both ways.

 

[Chudpreet]

"Black culture" would be Shaka Zulu, piracy, poverty, hunger, cannibalism, slavery, and ebola if it wasn't for the white man bringing them to the Land of the Free. Not saying that the current "black culture" is any better than ebola and cannibalism btw.

Heavy on the last sentence, lol. Africans' old tribal lifestyles were arguably superior to shit like this:

Eastern Cape protesters twerk for water as taps run dry | News24

About 300 people blocked the R67 between Fort Beaufort and Alice with burning tyres and stones on Monday, demanding water.

www.news24.com

Go back to whatever cesspool you swam out of.

Judging from his use of "dalit" unprovoked, he's probably a looksmaxxer

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

Incorrect, Romans were ANF dominant with some Steppe & Natufian in them

Nowadays, modern Italy(North mainly) is mixed with West European, same with South but with Balkan DNA & Greek.

Meds are also White btw.

Meds aren't white. The definition of white has eased over time. They don't look white and were never considered white until 50 years ago.

ANF DNA is precisely why they are non-white. The Anatolian farmers would have looked similar to modern southern Europeans perhaps slightly darker because there has been selection pressure for fair skin.

You need fair skin and colored eyes at minimum to be white.

That's not the point though. The point is that Southern Europeans are genotypically and phenotypically different from Northern Europeans and that's why they create different civilizations. They are between Whites and MENA.

Rome and Greece were biologically incapable of reaching current tech levels. Rome had almost zero scientific output, only Greece did a little. Renaissance Italy was more innovative than ancient Rome.

 

[over_department]

Niggers should be killed en masse

 

[based_meme]

Meds aren't white. The definition of white has eased over time. They don't look white and were never considered white until 50 years ago.

@DarkStar JFL @ this.

 

[Chudpreet]

Meds aren't white. The definition of white has eased over time. They don't look white and were never considered white until 50 years ago.

Europeans are pretty homogeneous genetically, this includes Meds:

ANF DNA is precisely why they are non-white. The Anatolian farmers would have looked similar to modern southern Europeans perhaps slightly darker because there has been selection pressure for fair skin.

All modern day white Europeans possess a substantial amount of ANF.

You need fair skin and colored eyes at minimum to be white.

Many of the pre-Anglo Saxon Celtic Britons would have been olive-skinned and brown-eyed, yet genetically these people were more Nordic and less Mediterranean than the invading Anglos. Phenotype =/= genotype

 

[based_meme]

Judging from his use of "dalit" unprovoked, he's probably a looksmaxxer

Probably another self-hating curry.

 

[DarkStar]

Meds aren't white. The definition of white has eased over time. They don't look white and were never considered white until 50 years ago.

All White looking btw, not to mention Slavs, Irish, etc. were seen the same


Also, here's some Med phenos:

Gracile Mediterranid

Which is distinct from MENA & was considered a "pigmented" version of North European:

Coon took the Nordics to be a partially depigmented branch of the greater Mediterranean racial stock.[29] This theory was also supported by Coon's mentor Earnest Albert Hooton, who in the same year published Twilight of Man, which stated: "The Nordic race is certainly a depigmented offshoot from the basic long-headed Mediterranean stock. It deserves separate racial classification only because its blond hair (ash or golden), its pure blue or grey eyes".[30][29]

Here's also what the NSDAP says:

cited the works of Hans F. K. Günther. The text seems to categorize the European races in descending orders in the Nazi racial hierarchy: the Nordic (including the Phalic sub-race, a subgroup of the Nordic race), Mediterranean, Dinaric, Alpine, and East Baltic races.[7]

ANF DNA is precisely why they are non-white.

Incorrect, all Europeans have it:

Anatolian farmers would have looked similar to modern southern Europeans perhaps slightly darker because there has been selection pressure for fair skin.

Here's some ANF reconstructions:

You need fair skin and colored eyes at minimum to be white.

What about hair color?

And what about "lighter" brown eyes, not the t50s on ethnics.

That's not the point though. The point is that Southern Europeans are genotypically and phenotypically different from Northern Europeans and that's why they create different civilizations. They are between Whites and MENA.

They're closer to N Europeans actually

Europeans are closer to one another than any other races are.

I find it funny how it's also a literal Shitskin thinking they can decide who is White & who Isn't jfl, it's always these people saying this.

@Castaway
@Chudpreet
@WorthlessSlavicShit

 

[DarkStar]

Europeans are pretty homogeneous genetically, this includes Meds:
View attachment 1309571

All modern day white Europeans possess a substantial amount of ANF.

Correct, as proven by what I shared

Many of the pre-Anglo Saxon Celtic Britons would have been olive-skinned and brown-eyed, yet genetically these people were more Nordic and less Mediterranean than the invading Anglos. Phenotype =/= genotype

Yup, and it shows in many of them.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

Europeans are pretty homogeneous genetically, this includes Meds:
View attachment 1309571

All modern day white Europeans possess a substantial amount of ANF.

Many of the pre-Anglo Saxon Celtic Britons would have been olive-skinned and brown-eyed, yet genetically these people were more Nordic and less Mediterranean than the invading Anglos. Phenotype =/= genotype

Meds are by the far the most ANF and they don't even look white. Swedes and Greeks are not part of the same race. Greeks and Turks are part of the same race. Genetically they are inbetween Whites and Sands. Phenotypically they look like Sands from Turkey or Lebanon or Syria.

A few britons are also non-white but these people are rare. Even brown eyed northern Europeans look visibly different from meds.

 

[DarkStar]

Meds are by the far the most ANF

Yes, and ANF is substantially in all Europeans & was always "closer" to HG+Steppe.

Swedes and Greeks are not part of the same race. Greeks and Turks are part of the same race. Genetically they are inbetween Whites and Sands. Phenotypically they look like Sands from Turkey or Lebanon or Syria.

Incorrect, I shared examples above+phenotypes: MENA have distinct facial features, compared to Meds.

And no, genetically they are closer to Europeans with just some MENA in them.

Even brown eyed northern Europeans look visibly different from meds.

So do they not get the JBW halo due to having brown eyes.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

View attachment 1309567

View attachment 1309569

View attachment 1309570

All White looking btw, not to mention Slavs, Irish, etc. were seen the same


Also, here's some Med phenos:

View attachment 1309574

Gracile Mediterranid

Which is distinct from MENA & was considered a "pigmented" version of North European:



Here's also what the NSDAP says:


Incorrect, all Europeans have it:

View attachment 1309572

Here's some ANF reconstructions:

What about hair color?

And what about "lighter" brown eyes, not the t50s on ethnics.

They're closer to N Europeans actually

View attachment 1309568

Europeans are closer to one another than any other races are.

I find it funny how it's also a literal Shitskin thinking they can decide who is White & who Isn't jfl, it's always these people saying this.

@Castaway
@Chudpreet
@WorthlessSlavicShit

This is what meds look like

You have to be clinically insane to think these people are the same race as Swedes. Genetically Meds are closer to Turks than they are Whites. Phenotypically they could more easily pass in Turkey or Lebanon than Sweden or Denmark. Most Southern Europeans have brown skin, black or dark brown hair, and brown eyes.

This is not the same race as Nordics. They were never considered the same race either until ideas about white identity expanded to include them.

Whites are a light skinned fair eyed and haired race inhabiting northern europe. Greeks, Sicilians, Portuguese etc are non-white.

 

[Chudpreet]

Swedes and Greeks are not part of the same race. Greeks and Turks are part of the same race.

Have yet to see any genetic studies that support this idea. Yeah, some Greeks do cluster closer to Turks than to other continental Europeans, but for the most part they don't, as you can see in the graph I shared above.

Phenotypically they look like Sands from Turkey or Lebanon or Syria.

Not really, no. There's phenotypical variation among both Meds and MENAs, so some Meds may look MENA (and vice versa), but this generally isn't the case.

Typical Greek/Balkan looks:

Typical Turkish/Syrian/Lebanese looks:

A few britons are also non-white but these people are rare.

No native Britons are non-white. As I explained above, despite the Celtic Britons having more presence of Med phenos than the Anglos, genetically they are on average more Nordic and less Med. See the Early Neolithic (ANF) and Yamnaya amounts for Scots on the chart below compared to Anglos:

Also see this chart based on G25 admixture analysis displaying the average Yamnaya autosomal percentage in European groups (compare England to Ireland, Scotland, and Wales):

 

[DarkStar]

This is what meds look like

View attachment 1309580
View attachment 1309581
View attachment 1309582
View attachment 1309583
View attachment 1309584

You have to be clinically insane to think these people are the same race as Swedes. Genetically Meds are closer to Turks than they are Whites. Phenotypically they could more easily pass in Turkey or Lebanon than Sweden or Denmark. Most Southern Europeans have brown skin, black or dark brown hair, and brown eyes.

This is not the same race as Nordics. They were never considered the same race either until ideas about white identity expanded to include them.

Whites are a light skinned fair eyed and haired race inhabiting northern europe. Greeks, Sicilians, Portuguese etc are non-white.

I showed some examples of guys who can be verified as being Meds(military images)

I also showed phenotypes, such as these ones:

Have yet to see any genetic studies that support this idea. Yeah, some Greeks do cluster closer to Turks than to other continental Europeans, but for the most part they don't, as you can see in the graph I shared above.

Not really, no. There's phenotypical variation among both Meds and MENAs, so some Meds may look MENA (and vice versa), but this generally isn't the case.

Typical Greek/Balkan looks:
View attachment 1309586View attachment 1309588View attachment 1309591View attachment 1309592

Here's again the Gracile Med one:

Gracile Mediterranid

Eurafricanid

Typical Turkish/Syrian/Lebanese looks:
View attachment 1309593View attachment 1309595View attachment 1309596View attachment 1309597

No native Britons are non-white. As I explained above, despite the Celtic Britons having more presence of Med phenos than the Anglos, genetically they are on average more Nordic and less Med. See the Early Neolithic (ANF) and Yamnaya amounts for Scots on the chart below compared to Anglos:

View attachment 1309599

Also see this chart based on G25 admixture analysis displaying the average Yamnaya autosomal percentage in European groups (compare England to Ireland, Scotland, and Wales):

View attachment 1309600

And no, studies show they're closer to other Europeans than Turks, though some peripheral populations exist, as proven by the same images previously shared above.

 

[Balikesir]

Incorrect, I shared examples above+phenotypes: MENA have distinct facial features, compared to Meds.

And no, genetically they are closer to Europeans with just some MENA in them.

Greeks and Turks aren't the same race? The cope has reached new heights.

I agree that eastern Turks and to a lesser extend central Turks aren't, but western Turks clearly fit the schema.

And no before you have a massive breakdown again im not trying to make Turks into Europeans. We're not. Western Turks and Southern Greeks/Aegean Islanders are the same race.

Inb4 the cherry picked images of halstatt looking Greeks

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

Have yet to see any genetic studies that support this idea. Yeah, some Greeks do cluster closer to Turks than to other continental Europeans, but for the most part they don't, as you can see in the graph I shared above.

Not really, no. There's phenotypical variation among both Meds and MENAs, so some Meds may look MENA (and vice versa), but this generally isn't the case.

Typical Greek/Balkan looks:
View attachment 1309586View attachment 1309588View attachment 1309591View attachment 1309592

Typical Turkish/Syrian/Lebanese looks:
View attachment 1309593View attachment 1309595View attachment 1309596View attachment 1309597

No native Britons are non-white. As I explained above, despite the Celtic Britons having more presence of Med phenos than the Anglos, genetically they are on average more Nordic and less Med. See the ANF and Yamnaya amounts for Scots on the chart below compared to Anglos:

View attachment 1309599

Also see this chart based on G25 admixture analysis displaying the average Yamnaya autosomal percentage in European groups (compare England to Ireland, Scotland, and Wales):

View attachment 1309600

Pajeets have a much lower standard of whiteness than actual white people. I would be white India. They also consider brown hair white over there. I would consider kit harrington non-white. If you have brown skin, brown eyes, and black hair you are not the same race as someone with blue eyes, blonde hair, and whitr skin. This is not even including other differences like body hair, height, skull shape, etc.

Greeks are genetically closer to Turks than Northern Europeans.

 

[DarkStar]

Greeks and Turks aren't the same race? The cope has reached new heights.

I agree that eastern Turks and to a lesser extend central Turks aren't, but western Turks clearly fit the schema.

And no before you have a massive breakdown again im not trying to make Turks into Europeans. We're not. Western Turks and Southern Greeks/Aegean Islanders are the same race.

Oh no I agree, West Turks & South Greeks+Island Greeks(Aegaean) are close, though modern Turks have some Asiatic not really found in Greece:

Inb4 the cherry picked images of halstatt looking Greeks

Not gonna share, most are Gracile Med & Pontid:

Which is distinct in facial features from most Anatolians

 

[Balikesir]

Typical Turkish/Syrian/Lebanese looks

What are these phenotype averages? When I walk through western turkey the only people that resemble this are Kurdish people.

This is more accurate. Western Turks on average would look Pontid/Alpinid/Litorid. Some look Turanid.

 

[Balikesir]

no I agree, West Turks & South Greeks+Island Greeks(Aegaean) are close, though modern Turks have some Asiatic not really found in Greece

Okay cool I fully agree. We have the Turanid type in western Turkey too which doesn't appear in Greece because Greeks have no asiatic component.

 

[DarkStar]

Pajeets have a much lower standard of whiteness than actual white people. I would be white India. They also consider brown hair white over there. I would consider kit harrington non-white. If you have brown skin, brown eyes, and black hair you are not the same race as someone with blue eyes, blonde hair, and whitr skin. This is not even including other differences like body hair, height, skull shape, etc.

Cope jfl

Kit Harrington has the same facial features as other NW Europeans, and also can seemingly be light in the winter.

 

[Chudpreet]

What are these phenotype averages? When I walk through western turkey the only people that resemble this are Kurdish people.

View attachment 1309610
This is more accurate. Western Turks on average would look Pontid/Alpinid/Litorid. Some look Turanid.

I only shared the Anatolid and Armenoid images in relation to Turks. The other two phenos I shared were in reference to Syrians and Lebanese, whom @Shitskin=Shitlife also brought up

 

[based_meme]

This is not the same race as Nordics.

Correct. Meds are Nordics aren't the same ethnic group. They're both White European, though.

Why are you coping this hard? What race are you?

 

[Balikesir]

I only shared the Anatolid and Iranid images in relation to Turks. The other two phenos I shared were in reference to Syrians and Lebanese, whom @Shitskin=Shitlife also brought up

Ah I see. Yes those 2 are common in Turkey.

 

[DarkStar]

What are these phenotype averages? When I walk through western turkey the only people that resemble this are Kurdish people.

View attachment 1309610
This is more accurate. Western Turks on average would look Pontid/Alpinid/Litorid. Some look Turanid.

Anatolid+Armenid & East Alpinid aren't European phenos.

Same for the Turanid one.

Okay cool I fully agree. We have the Turanid type in western Turkey too which doesn't appear in Greece because Greeks have no asiatic component.

Ye, also Greeks have the Pontid pheno on average way more, and most Turks will be Anatolid I assume

You can't deny, they have different facial features at least

 

[anandkonda]

What race are you?

Claims Persian. Persian vs Greeks again

 

[To koniec]

What are these phenotype averages? When I walk through western turkey the only people that resemble this are Kurdish people.

View attachment 1309610
This is more accurate. Western Turks on average would look Pontid/Alpinid/Litorid. Some look Turanid.

Isn't anatolid most common phenotype in turkey ?

 

[Sloth]

Correct. Meds are Nordics aren't the same ethnic group. They're both White European, though.

Why are you coping this hard? What race are you?

He's sandnigger

 

[DarkStar]

Correct. Meds are Nordics aren't the same ethnic group. They're both White European.

As proven by the graphs myself & @Chudpreet shared, not to mention the literal NSDAP classifying Medditerranid as European

Why are you coping this hard? What race are you?

Obviously he's trying to project and/or pull others down

Isn't anatolid most common phenotype in turkey ?

Should be.

Claims Persian. Persian vs Greeks again

Jfl

War never changes.

This entire argument has been myself & @Chudpreet showing literal genetic studies, phenotypes, and also more verifiable images(ie; military pics who we can confirm are actually from there not random people)

 

[To koniec]

@Chudpreet what do you think is most ''common'' nordid phenotype in turkey ?

East Nordid ?

Arda Guler is Danubian Nordid mixed withs +something

@Balikesir
@DarkStar

 

[To koniec]

Should be.

I feel like anatolid should be but at same time i heard that most common phenotype in france is west alpinid and in czechia gorid so dunno if it's 100% true

 

[based_meme]

This entire argument has been myself & @Chudpreet showing literal genetic studies, phenotypes, and also more verifiable images(ie; military pics who we can confirm are actually from there not random people)

I don't know how he's going to cope with the facts.