The MAP issue is problematic because, in no particular order
1)Proponents of it are often left wing, which is: a) wrong on (nearly) every issue. b)distract from the fact they are against heterosexuality, marriage, life of the preborn who are children( Younger is better to MAPs. They forget about the youngest, the preborn girls), and youthfulness(of money, knowledge, intelligence, and income which is a contradiction to MAP ideology). c)They seek to reduce the birth rate. To do so is anti-chidlren. Children could become rare, and even if the MAP goal happens, such contact could be (aside from being pointless) rare too,
2) It's unlikely
3) What's at risk to heterosexuality is more
4) The children of csam might continue the adult industry, which involves abuse as well.
5) The age of consent is a law that allows premarital sex(which is a big deal, but not necessarily if it results in a shotgun wedding).
6) It could involve contraception.
7) It's not legal today and breaking the law is anti-children because a father could get arrested and separated from his kids, or locked up which can make it hard to make kids.
8) What matters is marriage, which MAP organizations are against. MAPs are against early marriage.
9) I think it could be related to incest, which is the worst
10) It's prohibited by many denominations.
11) It wouldn't be too common even if it were allowed.
13) There's focus on teen sexting, in a way that is unrelated to adults. The Romeo and Juliet laws exclude most men,
14) I assume a popular author of In Harm's Way, associated loosely with MAP thought supports sex education, which has reduced the birth rate.
15) Many pedophiles are gay. It'd be like giving them mmore rights.
16) It's unnecessary.
17) Sex isn't necessary for pregnancy, which is valued.
18) The right wing age of marriage laws have been lower.
Some men have a number fetish for numbers under 18.They are like Daniel Tammet, a numberphile who is gay. They like only 17 numbers. They support policies that worsen the income, abortion, birth rate,... numbers. This is how I view Todd Nickerson, a Democrat.
1)Proponents of it are often left wing, which is: a) wrong on (nearly) every issue. b)distract from the fact they are against heterosexuality, marriage, life of the preborn who are children( Younger is better to MAPs. They forget about the youngest, the preborn girls), and youthfulness(of money, knowledge, intelligence, and income which is a contradiction to MAP ideology). c)They seek to reduce the birth rate. To do so is anti-chidlren. Children could become rare, and even if the MAP goal happens, such contact could be (aside from being pointless) rare too,
2) It's unlikely
3) What's at risk to heterosexuality is more
4) The children of csam might continue the adult industry, which involves abuse as well.
5) The age of consent is a law that allows premarital sex(which is a big deal, but not necessarily if it results in a shotgun wedding).
6) It could involve contraception.
7) It's not legal today and breaking the law is anti-children because a father could get arrested and separated from his kids, or locked up which can make it hard to make kids.
8) What matters is marriage, which MAP organizations are against. MAPs are against early marriage.
9) I think it could be related to incest, which is the worst
10) It's prohibited by many denominations.
11) It wouldn't be too common even if it were allowed.
13) There's focus on teen sexting, in a way that is unrelated to adults. The Romeo and Juliet laws exclude most men,
14) I assume a popular author of In Harm's Way, associated loosely with MAP thought supports sex education, which has reduced the birth rate.
15) Many pedophiles are gay. It'd be like giving them mmore rights.
16) It's unnecessary.
17) Sex isn't necessary for pregnancy, which is valued.
18) The right wing age of marriage laws have been lower.
Some men have a number fetish for numbers under 18.They are like Daniel Tammet, a numberphile who is gay. They like only 17 numbers. They support policies that worsen the income, abortion, birth rate,... numbers. This is how I view Todd Nickerson, a Democrat.
Last edited:
