ResidentHell
Veteran
★
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2022
- Posts
- 1,078
Normieism is not just a condition of civilization or social conditioning. Normieism is a school of thought in its own right. Normieism is a way of life, like Confucianism, Stoicism. Moreover it's arguable that most practictioners of normieism aren't even aware that their thoughts & behaviors actually adhere to a certain school of thought, albeit a school of thought that's unformalized in philosophical literature
The philosophy of normieism can be summarized as the "predator-prey relationship", but in a very, very social context, rather than a context outside-of-civilization, like in a barbaric or pre-civilizational setting
If you see how normies are, you’ll know that most of them are like predators - They hunt for targets they perceive as easy to handle due to their "personality traits" (e.g. autism or non-NTness, physical inferiorities) or socio-economic situation that indicate their weakness, e.g. people who are low value, their voice is not heard or not taken seriously in social discourse, they are marginalized or already oppressed, not really known or cared about by members of their community. But normies rarely ever prey on the ones who they know are hard to deal with, e.g., people who are high value and well-protected, people whose opinions or observations are valued by other members of society. Normies like to go after targets that are defenseless or easy to strike at, and avoid the ones who they don’t have the resources to hunt down without high risk of failure or setback
Normies are predatorial creatures. I think normies are just as horrible, if not even more horrible than the same people they hunt down. Normies are like hyenas. They like to intimidate or harass people when they believe they have nearly the entire world behind their cause. But when that normie is left alone to handle the issue by themselves, it's very likely that the normie will lose their predatorial motivation, and are more likely to decide not to hunt for those same easy targets. Normies are mostly intimidators when in large numbers. But when that normie is left to handle business by itself, it’s not as much the bully that it was before. Its motivation and its passion to hunt for vulnerable prey, is no longer as great as it was before
Normieism carries on for life. Normieism is a way of life. There are many examples of low-functioning adults who practice the ways of the normie. Maybe they do it to have an ego trip, or because they have some notion of “righteousness” that’s inherently tied to hunting down certain types of people who are already low value or members of a marginalized class. If anything, many practitioners of normieism often have the excuse that they practice it for a reason that can be summarized as “might is right” or “helping cleanse the world of what they perceive as evil or a stain”
TLDR. The ways of normieism are practiced for life. It continues after school, into adulthood. There are loads of low-functioning adults who practice the ways of normieism, at workplace, in public and in other social institutions. Normieism, albeit as conceited and cruel as it may be, it is a way of life. Normieism is a school of philosophy in its own right, although I do not know any examples of literature that endorses the ways of normiesm (except maybe redpilled “self-help” / PUA books)
The philosophy of normieism can be summarized as the "predator-prey relationship", but in a very, very social context, rather than a context outside-of-civilization, like in a barbaric or pre-civilizational setting
If you see how normies are, you’ll know that most of them are like predators - They hunt for targets they perceive as easy to handle due to their "personality traits" (e.g. autism or non-NTness, physical inferiorities) or socio-economic situation that indicate their weakness, e.g. people who are low value, their voice is not heard or not taken seriously in social discourse, they are marginalized or already oppressed, not really known or cared about by members of their community. But normies rarely ever prey on the ones who they know are hard to deal with, e.g., people who are high value and well-protected, people whose opinions or observations are valued by other members of society. Normies like to go after targets that are defenseless or easy to strike at, and avoid the ones who they don’t have the resources to hunt down without high risk of failure or setback
Normies are predatorial creatures. I think normies are just as horrible, if not even more horrible than the same people they hunt down. Normies are like hyenas. They like to intimidate or harass people when they believe they have nearly the entire world behind their cause. But when that normie is left alone to handle the issue by themselves, it's very likely that the normie will lose their predatorial motivation, and are more likely to decide not to hunt for those same easy targets. Normies are mostly intimidators when in large numbers. But when that normie is left to handle business by itself, it’s not as much the bully that it was before. Its motivation and its passion to hunt for vulnerable prey, is no longer as great as it was before
Normieism carries on for life. Normieism is a way of life. There are many examples of low-functioning adults who practice the ways of the normie. Maybe they do it to have an ego trip, or because they have some notion of “righteousness” that’s inherently tied to hunting down certain types of people who are already low value or members of a marginalized class. If anything, many practitioners of normieism often have the excuse that they practice it for a reason that can be summarized as “might is right” or “helping cleanse the world of what they perceive as evil or a stain”
TLDR. The ways of normieism are practiced for life. It continues after school, into adulthood. There are loads of low-functioning adults who practice the ways of normieism, at workplace, in public and in other social institutions. Normieism, albeit as conceited and cruel as it may be, it is a way of life. Normieism is a school of philosophy in its own right, although I do not know any examples of literature that endorses the ways of normiesm (except maybe redpilled “self-help” / PUA books)