L
Cuckolds/women always claim that a lack of personality is the reason why incels are incels.
First of all: The sheer irony that modern women accuse us of having no personality is immeasurable. The personality of the modern woman consists out of Netflix, her favourite kind of food and cute animal babies. Tattoos etc. aren’t a substitute for a personality either. But despite being a non-entry in the personality department and often also failing in terms of looks they expect men to be jack of all trades, smart, interesting and good-looking.
A unique personality/unique interests are also a complete meme. Everyone knows men that became absolute shades of their former selves after entering a relationship. If the woman doesn’t approve the passions/personality traits of her significant other she will throw a tantrum until they are changed. They completely hinder males in their self-actualization and don’t give the slightest fuck about their wants/needs. Most former friends completely change during a relationship and throw away year-long friendships due to 1) thinking that they are above you, 2) lack of time, 3) no approval of you as a friend by their girlfriend. A male can have a unique personality and unique interests, but women destroy them during a relationship in order to turn their hubby into their willing slave. Truly unique personalities/interests are more of an obstacle towards relationships than an advantage in these years.
“Just change your personality, bro!” – how? You cannot just change a personality. The personality of a person is the result of years of life experience and biologically determined factors that are beyond anyone’s control. You cannot just ignore these facts and throw everything out of the window.
Furthermore, a personality cannot be judged objectively by a woman without taking the looks of a person into consideration. An example: Different sorts of behaviour. If an attractive male behaves very nice, he is seen as a gentleman, if an ugly male treats women with respect, everyone suspects ulterior motives (“He’s just putting on an act in order to get into her pants!”, “What a creep!”). The same rule applies to all sorts of behaviour: It’s called the Halo effect. An ugly man can be the greatest angel or the worst devil – it won’t change the perception women have of him.
Last but not least, we come to the reason why the personality myth persists. Successful people in every field always claim that the reason for their success is hard work. That’s why they claim that their personality/confidence (changeable traits) are the reason for their success and not the immutable (pre-determined) characteristics like looks. Rich people do the same. They aren’t rich because of sheer luck/pre-determined factors (being born into a wealthy family, having the intelligence to rise in the hierarchy – the last trait is mostly biologically determined), but rather because of their hard work (changeable trait). And the others are poor because they are lazy fucks. Claiming otherwise would be poison to their self-esteem, because they would have to acknowledge the fact that their status was only achieved due to sheer fucking luck and not because of their hard work and good morals. They like to believe in the just world. They are successful because they are good and moral people and the others don’t have success because they are bad people. Their whole arrogant narrative of their own moral superiority/success story would be over in the moment people realized that their high status was achieved in the moment of karyogamy and the completely random events before that.
First of all: The sheer irony that modern women accuse us of having no personality is immeasurable. The personality of the modern woman consists out of Netflix, her favourite kind of food and cute animal babies. Tattoos etc. aren’t a substitute for a personality either. But despite being a non-entry in the personality department and often also failing in terms of looks they expect men to be jack of all trades, smart, interesting and good-looking.
A unique personality/unique interests are also a complete meme. Everyone knows men that became absolute shades of their former selves after entering a relationship. If the woman doesn’t approve the passions/personality traits of her significant other she will throw a tantrum until they are changed. They completely hinder males in their self-actualization and don’t give the slightest fuck about their wants/needs. Most former friends completely change during a relationship and throw away year-long friendships due to 1) thinking that they are above you, 2) lack of time, 3) no approval of you as a friend by their girlfriend. A male can have a unique personality and unique interests, but women destroy them during a relationship in order to turn their hubby into their willing slave. Truly unique personalities/interests are more of an obstacle towards relationships than an advantage in these years.
“Just change your personality, bro!” – how? You cannot just change a personality. The personality of a person is the result of years of life experience and biologically determined factors that are beyond anyone’s control. You cannot just ignore these facts and throw everything out of the window.
Furthermore, a personality cannot be judged objectively by a woman without taking the looks of a person into consideration. An example: Different sorts of behaviour. If an attractive male behaves very nice, he is seen as a gentleman, if an ugly male treats women with respect, everyone suspects ulterior motives (“He’s just putting on an act in order to get into her pants!”, “What a creep!”). The same rule applies to all sorts of behaviour: It’s called the Halo effect. An ugly man can be the greatest angel or the worst devil – it won’t change the perception women have of him.
Last but not least, we come to the reason why the personality myth persists. Successful people in every field always claim that the reason for their success is hard work. That’s why they claim that their personality/confidence (changeable traits) are the reason for their success and not the immutable (pre-determined) characteristics like looks. Rich people do the same. They aren’t rich because of sheer luck/pre-determined factors (being born into a wealthy family, having the intelligence to rise in the hierarchy – the last trait is mostly biologically determined), but rather because of their hard work (changeable trait). And the others are poor because they are lazy fucks. Claiming otherwise would be poison to their self-esteem, because they would have to acknowledge the fact that their status was only achieved due to sheer fucking luck and not because of their hard work and good morals. They like to believe in the just world. They are successful because they are good and moral people and the others don’t have success because they are bad people. Their whole arrogant narrative of their own moral superiority/success story would be over in the moment people realized that their high status was achieved in the moment of karyogamy and the completely random events before that.
