The perfect counter would be to show proof of either an already completed experiment or video: showing how a man with the same timeless profile—same pictures, same age, same bio & interests, hobbies, locations, height, everything (same ELO too by the way), so that means you have to do this on multiple dating app accounts (to keep the age the same every year the experiment goes on), and dating apps—where the profiles can each be different per app—to show that hoeflation is indeed rising on dating apps. The conclusion should have nothing do with gender ratio changes or population changes or attitude changes or any other external black swan event that could change results in ways bluepillers will use to cope out of. Imo it should be done in big cities, so you can never run out of content to see how the matches talk to your normie independent variable, or you can find very stable cities / towns with the same number of active users per year
The only way I think this can be invalidated is if you say ALL dating apps’ algorithms were somehow changed throughout the years, which supplemental experiments done with chadfishes being used as proof. The chadfishes would have to prove that they’re getting less matches/likes as time goes on. I however theorize that chads have gotten more over time because of how much more normalized promiscuous views in women have gotten over time, growing shifts towards liberal ideology, the height shaming social media trends, all the validation, exposure to our growing oversexualized culture at younger and younger ages and of course being encouraged to “chase their dreams” more than ever.
I feel like normies in general understand that it’s getting harder to get girls via Instagram DM or whatever, so they know that one is true when it comes to us being right, but if they are shown perfect proof that standards are rising on tinder, then that just goes to show you how it’s rising everywhere across-the-board, it’s not our fault and that it’s reasonable to assume that standards are rising IRL.
That would shut down their OLD cope. They’d then have to blame technology in general. Then the media or whatever. Then ultimately men in the end. That’s where it always leads to with normies
The only way I think this can be invalidated is if you say ALL dating apps’ algorithms were somehow changed throughout the years, which supplemental experiments done with chadfishes being used as proof. The chadfishes would have to prove that they’re getting less matches/likes as time goes on. I however theorize that chads have gotten more over time because of how much more normalized promiscuous views in women have gotten over time, growing shifts towards liberal ideology, the height shaming social media trends, all the validation, exposure to our growing oversexualized culture at younger and younger ages and of course being encouraged to “chase their dreams” more than ever.
I feel like normies in general understand that it’s getting harder to get girls via Instagram DM or whatever, so they know that one is true when it comes to us being right, but if they are shown perfect proof that standards are rising on tinder, then that just goes to show you how it’s rising everywhere across-the-board, it’s not our fault and that it’s reasonable to assume that standards are rising IRL.
That would shut down their OLD cope. They’d then have to blame technology in general. Then the media or whatever. Then ultimately men in the end. That’s where it always leads to with normies
Last edited:
