They did this to make more money and because babyboomers in several countries have drastically increased population, thanks to the destruction of the family today you know the nature of foids and the population will decline a bit. See your grandmother who must have had more than 3 children and see if it is sustainable for a long time, they have united the useful to the pleasant and encouraged the degeneration to decline the population, even crazy single mothers on average do not want to have more than 3 children.
The increase of working foids also allowed the flattening of wages that can also be part of this population control plan, as they could not throw atomic bombs corrupt inside. A boomer family model is not viable with such a high consumption rate. Patriarchy will not return! The more conservative countries will also begin to be plagued by estrategic degeneration.
We are only feeling the effects and the taste of a bitter remedy!
A negative effect is hypergamy by dangerous men and dangerous chads over "good men", passing genes responsible for violent behavior.
I believe there are other reasons, posting this after seeing a post showing families from the 1950s seems to me (a decade before the 1960s where everything really started), and I see that many here have not yet realized why this model is partly unfeasible long-term.
The increase of working foids also allowed the flattening of wages that can also be part of this population control plan, as they could not throw atomic bombs corrupt inside. A boomer family model is not viable with such a high consumption rate. Patriarchy will not return! The more conservative countries will also begin to be plagued by estrategic degeneration.
We are only feeling the effects and the taste of a bitter remedy!
A negative effect is hypergamy by dangerous men and dangerous chads over "good men", passing genes responsible for violent behavior.
I believe there are other reasons, posting this after seeing a post showing families from the 1950s seems to me (a decade before the 1960s where everything really started), and I see that many here have not yet realized why this model is partly unfeasible long-term.
Last edited:
