Theory The paradox of feminism.

[MarquisDeSade]

The paradox of feminism is very easy to explain, feminism demands social and sexual equality of females to men, but the majority of females look at the majority of men as being completely expendable simultaneously. Understanding this, why should that majority group of males who are viewed as being completely expendable or worthless care at all about female equality? Why would that same majority of men want to maintain, continue, or support it? This is the future conflict of the sexes going into the future, this paradox alone, and as this paradox becomes more known or mentally ingrained within the majority of expendable men feminism will not survive their collective wrath over time. Discuss.

 

[FrothySolutions]

There's all kinds of feminism, various waves and doctrines and tenets. That's why we have terms like "intersectional feminism." As a way of saying "We can't agree on anything, but let's try to agree that we all mean well."

 

[MarquisDeSade]

but let's try to agree that we all mean well."

Clearly, they don't.

 

[IncelWithHate]

There's all kinds of feminism, various waves and doctrines and tenets. That's why we have terms like "intersectional feminism." As a way of saying "We can't agree on anything, but let's try to agree that we all mean well."

This is irrelevant and arguably obfuscation on the part of women. In the end, misandrists create/influence the laws and policies that disadvantage men so who cares what the common women on the street claim?

What is actually relevant is that women make absolutely no peep when men are subjected to biased family courts and partisan laws (except to defend the status quo). This alone shows you women are all complicit in feminism. This is unsurprising since women are essentially feminism - its simply an expression of female nature combined with political power, dogma and educational influence. The end result is to increase gynocentrism and allow it to run rampant.

Of course women agree among themselves that they mean well - as in doing well for themselves at the expense of men and even children.

 

[MarquisDeSade]

This is irrelevant and arguably obfuscation on the part of women. In the end, misandrists create/influence the laws and policies that disadvantage men so who cares what the common women on the street claim?

What is actually relevant is that women make absolutely no peep when men are subjected to biased family courts and partisan laws. This alone shows you women are all complicit in feminism. This is unsurprising since women are essentially feminism - its simply an expression of female nature combined with political power, dogma and educational influence.

Of course women agree among themselves that they mean well - as in doing well for themselves at the expense of men and even children.

Precisely, a woman's daily sphere of influence does not extend outside of herself, she only cares what is good for herself or other women. Everything must be a mirror extension of themselves because they're unable to see anything else beyond. [In fact, they actively refuse to.]

The notion of general prosperity within society in the mind of females is what is good for themselves and only for themselves with nothing else in mind.

 

[IncelWithHate]

The paradox of feminism

There is no 'paradox'. Feminism is working precisely as intended by women. Has been since the start.

 

[trying to ascend]

I mean, this isn't a paradox, because what feminism demands is more rights (privilleges) to foids.

Also, even if it demanded gender equality, it would be only at the extent of how the state treats you, not on how other people view you.

Even if it demanded the latter, it would not be a paradox, since its not counter-intuitive, its just saying that men shouldn't give equal rights for those who don't treat them well. Could only be a paradox if it demanded equal rights, but at the same time denied those to the same extent it demands them

 

[MarquisDeSade]

There is no 'paradox'. Feminism is working precisely as intended by women. Has been since the start.

Sure, I agree. I'm just a male trying to be logical speaking of the irrational gender that refuses to be logical basically pointing out the errors of their own ideological or fanatical framework. But yes, it was intended for their own empowerment with the disempowerment of the majority of men, that much is very clear.

 

[IncelWithHate]

Precisely, a woman's daily sphere of influence does not extend outside of herself, she only cares what is good for herself or other women. Everything must be a mirror extension of themselves because they're unable to see anything else beyond. [In fact, they actively refuse to.]

The notion of general prosperity within society in the mind of females is what is good for themselves and only for themselves with nothing else in mind.

Yes, women are solipsistic. This is why they are unable to ever empathize with men's plight - it is completely alien to them and they cannot even conceive of it.

I argue women cannot 'love' men due to this. They are simply too selfish for that.

 

[MarquisDeSade]

Yes, women are solipsistic. This is why they are unable to ever empathize with men's plight - it is completely alien to them and they cannot even conceive of it.

I argue women cannot 'love' men due to this. They are simply too selfish for that.

Agreed, a woman is incapable of loving a man. Females love a man's productivity, money, status, property, physical attributes, title, and the sphere of what he controls which then becomes their incentive but never the man individually himself beyond the materially mundane. A woman loves only what a man has or owns and nothing else.

 

[FuRed]

A paradox with flies

View: https://youtu.be/D56aE951qQc