The overwhelming Majority of New Testament Scholars today affirm that the people did find an empty tomb and see Jesus risen.

[humbleautist]

You'll find that majority of new testament scholars today, in a world that is very anti Christian, does believe that the first people and disciples did in fact believe to see the Risen Jesus and find the tomb to be empty.

They affirm 3 things:

-That His tomb was indeed found empty on the first day of the week by a group of His female followers.

-Various individuals in groups of people witnessed appearances of Jesus alive.

-That the original disciples suddenly and sincerely believet that God has raised Jesus from the dead.

The vast majority scholars come to accept as convincing the evidence, in support of those three facts. Treating the gospels as oridinary historical documents.

Nothing some redditard atheist says can counter that. That's why I won't even bother reading any replies.

As a result, throughout history attemps have been made to explain these facts, such as the hallucination theory where the people all saw a mutual hallucination of Jesus, or the apparent death theory, and so forth.

None of these theories are good at all, or meet the criteria.

 

[comradespiderman29]

Amen

 

[Ellsworth]

You'll find that majority of new testament scholars today, in a world that is very anti Christian, does believe that the first people and disciples did in fact believe to see the Risen Jesus and find the tomb to be empty.

They affirm 3 things:

-That His tomb was indeed found empty on the first day of the week by a group of His female followers.

-Various individuals in groups of people witnessed appearances of Jesus alive.

-That the original disciples suddenly and sincerely believet that God has raised Jesus from the dead.

The vast majority scholars come to accept as convincing the evidence, in support of those three facts. Treating the gospels as oridinary historical documents.

Nothing some redditard atheist says can counter that. That's why I won't even bother reading any replies.

As a result, throughout history attemps have been made to explain these facts, such as the hallucination theory where the people all saw a mutual hallucination of Jesus, or the apparent death theory, and so forth.

None of these theories are good at all, or meet the criteria.

Have you been watching Gary Habermas?

 

[humbleautist]

Have you been watching Gary Habermas?

William Lane Craig.


View: https://youtu.be/mM4MyLJVv9g?si=M5MnNy7CaMhRDqqr

 

[VλREN]

I’ve heard Nick Fuentes say this before

My only problem is that this happened 2000 years ago, so it’s impossible to prove

 

[FJ_Schizo]

Wasnt the Shroud recently proved to be authentic?

 

[CHOoseWisely123]

Why doesn’t Jesus do a miracle to make me handsome maybe then I’ll believe in your little fable myth

 

[ResidentHell]

A typical polemical argument. Make a claim. Provide no evidence of sources to corroborate such claim. Then state that you’ll not read any counter-claims to your original claim because you are confident that your original claim is irrefutable. Classic apologetics by a non-critical thinker

There’s only one irrefutable way to prove that Jesus at least could have been the prophesized Messiah that all Christcucks seem to believe in:

Find archaeological evidence that directly proves the existence of Abraham, Issac, Jacob and Judah​

Provide physical or genealogical evidence that Jesus was the direct descendant of Judah​

Apparently Christcucks have so far not completed both tasks, 2000 years later. I question if they ever will. Perhaps @humbleautist isn’t as “humble” as he thought of himself

 

[Antorian]

You're right.

Atheism is such a pathetic cope