Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The only valid law is the law of force.

Anarcho Nihilist

Anarcho Nihilist

Generalfeldmarschall
★★
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
3,172
I've never understood the nonsense about laws and international law. I never understood why it was necessary to arrange Nuremberg, like, except to further humiliate the lose side. Were the bombing of German cities by Allied aircraft legitimate? Was the expulsion of 8 million ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe legal? Was the transfer of Silesia and East Prussia in favor of other countries legal? And what can only be concluded is that only one law applies - whoever is stronger is right.

View: https://youtu.be/4lmIM3RrYJ4?si=OCzqk2hJGeCRoWI6


View: https://youtu.be/zyWx4p4hiaY?si=a04zRywvL5mgmro4
 
Last edited:
People like you say this, then make passionate blogs about the fall of constantinople.

Im not sure what you think of that but i have a feeling you're one of those types. No hard feelings.
 
Force and law are, in theory, linked and inseparable. By its essence, law must compel, else it's relegated to polite and civil suggestion.

And what can only be concluded is that only one law applies - whoever is stronger is right.
Might does not make right. Might makes law.

What's lawful is not what's right, and what's right is not what's lawful. Those are different things. There is obviously some overlap, though. For many everyday, ordinary citizens and people, however, they are effectively the same. People derive their sense of right and wrong mostly from the laws of the land that they're subjected to.
 
People like you say this, then make passionate blogs about the fall of constantinople.

Im not sure what you think of that but i have a feeling you're one of those types. No hard feelings.
jfl
 
Might does not make right
Might does make right though. What you mean is that might isn't synonymous to right.
If someone physically forces you with the treat of jail to not say "That trannie will never be a woman", then it isn't objectively morally correct, it is only relationally correct within the context of said person being there that forces you to be PC.

Honestly if you apply the Münchhausen's paradox to any moral dilemma you'll realize that it is all made up.
Might makes law.
Correct observation.
 
People like you say this, then make passionate blogs about the fall of constantinople.

Im not sure what you think of that but i have a feeling you're one of those types. No hard feelings.
Firstly, I am not an Orthodox Christian, but an atheist, so Constantinople has no meaning for me. Secondly, the question of Constantinople is a tragedy for the Greeks, since it used to be their territory.
 
People like you say this, then make passionate blogs about the fall of constantinople.

Im not sure what you think of that but i have a feeling you're one of those types. No hard feelings.
kek.
Personally i think the only good thing about humanity is that it managed to rise above the cruelty of nature and establish some sort of moral order, that order is now being thrown into the garbage doe
 
Might does make right though. What you mean is that might isn't synonymous to right.
I meant that whether or not something is "right" is not contingent upon it being forced onto others into acceptance.

If someone physically forces you with the treat of jail to not say "That trannie will never be a woman", then it isn't objectively morally correct, it is only relationally correct within the context of said person being there that forces you to be PC.
Yes.

Honestly if you apply the Münchhausen's paradox to any moral dilemma you'll realize that it is all made up.
Applying the paradox to morality quickly shows that any moral basis that claims objectivity must take certain things as a given by fiat. However, I don't know if it's correct to conclude that "it's all made up" as a result. There very well may be some set of objective moral truths out there that exist a priori in a kind of Platonic sense, and the best we can hope for is that our moral systems - whether by dogma or by axiom - are close approximations.
 
Firstly, I am not an Orthodox Christian, but an atheist, so Constantinople has no meaning for me. Secondly, the question of Constantinople is a tragedy for the Greeks, since it used to be their territory.
You are sad about it, yes. Like I said.

On another note, I do not want to bother you with topics and discussions you are not interested in. The things im about to tell you are common knowledge for most of the dna and nationalism related internet, but Turks are the locals who you mourn for. I am not sad, brother. Im very happy about what happened.

How can I be sad when my own emperor converted to islam and led the troops in battle against europeans?

Mesih was related to the Palaiologoi, the last ruling dynasty of the Byzantine Empire. According to the 16th-century Ecthesis Chronica, he was the son of a certain Gidos Palaiologos, identified by the contemporary Historia Turchesca (attributed to Donado da Lezze or Giovanni Maria Angiolello) as a brother of a Byzantine emperor.[2] This emperor is commonly held to have been Constantine XI Palaiologos, the last Byzantine emperor, who was killed during the Fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II in 1453.[3] If true, since Constantine XI died childless, and had the Ottomans failed to conquer Constantinople, Mesih or his brother Hass Murad Pasha might have succeeded him. Instead, Mesih rose to become one of the most powerful men in the state that destroyed the Byzantine Empire.
The post is not about this subject. I would understand if you don't want to discuss this. It is common knowledge. You should know this. You people make jokes about this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top