Blackpill The natural inclination for people to look for refinement means most people are going to be rejected and anxious.

[Pinpoint]

Most people don't socialize happily. Most peopel socialize nervously/ maintaingly and are happy when it works. But it still was a bloodsport. A buried bloodsport, and if nobody can see it ,then people can bury it in their subconscious.
People are typically only conscious of something insofar as it affects their life goals. And the blackpill reality of life is a burden. The blackpill is buried in normies so long as no one can see it. And it just happens to be thatthe blackpill isn't buriable to most people here, and os they focus on it.
But most people if 6+ would probably be bluepilled here.

People don't care if they have empty relationships. Everyone is angry, narcissistic, and trying to gain manipulative advantage with eachother. Empty relationships with good looking peopel are desirable.

 

[Pinpoint]

Our relationships aren't based on compatibility of personality. It is based on selection of genetics, which is why good looking people who are horrible human beings get ahead in the procreation game. The human psyche doesn't care about personality; its designed to ensure the genetic fitness and competitiveness of future children, so if that means sacrificing personal compatibility and health and longevity of a relationships, then so be it. The goal is to bring a child of good genes into this world; how you do it is not important. That means a Chad can beat up and violently rape a thousand whores if he wishes. Nature will side with him. Hell, even the women who he is acting out on will side with him! How many times have we seen women forgive violent Chads who've administered violence on them? Plenty! No one say that you have to be a good person to win at procreation. You just have to have good genes. Same goes for the cucked guys who chase bitchy airhead stacies who treats her orbiters like trash. We are cucks and slaves for good genes. The end.

competitivity is not just based on actual combat utility. That's animalistic. We live in a world of presentability, and displayability. Hence children are chosen to be groomed for impressions by women today rather than what is actually masculine more or more effective in the actual world.
We pick people on the premise of them looking like they'd be in a movie rather an actual survival.

Women put morality behind primal distinguishment and a woman would rather get beat by a good looking guy and the impression he gives than to have what is morally right, and go with a guy who is morally right in a lot of cases. So how do they pick based on morality.
Primal distinguishment > sense.

Women don't go for the most heartful underdogs, they want the topdog. So if you're trying as an underdog it doesn't matter. You should become like a jew and hijack yourself into a high status position by breeding girls through money and status.
Women want men with libervulgarchal value.
The more difficult, the more rare a trait, the more it fits the needlehole effect. Needlehole from vulgarity effect activated = libervulgarchal distinguishment.

Displayabilitarchy outweighs rawdominarchy.

 

[truthpill]

Everyone is blackpilled, they act accordingly, they just don't openly express it like we do because of fear of being non-NT, everyone knows that better looking men have a massive edge when it comes to dating and have no competition from inferior looking males when it comes to getting sex.

Women are biologically wired to want the most alpha male (good genes, good bone structure, chisseled jawline, masculine facial features, height and testosterone). They cannot be taught to favor morally superior and cultured men, their brains are not capable of processing such an ideology even if it is the correct one and would be adequate in a funcitonal society. Women would be useless if they were unable to breed, they are not neurologically capable of providing genuine companionship, their only positive contribution to society is keeping the human race in reproduction. Good values and personality cannot be processed by the female brain as it has not evolved past the point of primality. When a female talks about "good guys", she is either virtue signalling or referring to a genetically superior primate.

Remember that men are the people who fought and coordinated wars, created economy and put a man on the moon, the male brain has the capability of being rational and the female brain does not. Most men will date most women (unless she is excessively obese), which is an indicator of potentially unhealthy offspring) as long as she is nice and is a good person (this does not happen in the 21st century however), men make rational and practical mating decisions while women harm it with their hypergamy and poor partner selection (the good men getting left alone).

TLDR: Women are primal and do not make positive contributions to society thanks to that.

 

[Pinpoint]

Everyone is blackpilled, they act accordingly, they just don't openly express it like we do because of fear of being non-NT, everyone knows that better looking men have a massive edge when it comes to dating and have no competition from inferior looking males when it comes to getting sex.

Women are biologically wired to want the most alpha male (good genes, good bone structure, chisseled jawline, masculine facial features, height and testosterone). They cannot be taught to favor morally superior and cultured men, their brains are not capable of processing such an ideology even if it is the correct one and would be adequate in a funcitonal society. Women would be useless if they were unable to breed, they are not neurologically capable of providing genuine companionship, their only positive contribution to society is keeping the human race in reproduction. Good values and personality cannot be processed by the female brain as it has not evolved past the point of primality. When a female talks about "good guys", she is either virtue signalling or referring to a genetically superior primate.

Remember that men are the people who fought and coordinated wars, created economy and put a man on the moon, the male brain has the capability of being rational and the female brain does not. Most men will date most women (unless she is excessively obese), which is an indicator of potentially unhealthy offspring) as long as she is nice and is a good person (this does not happen in the 21st century however), men make rational and practical mating decisions while women harm it with their hypergamy and poor partner selection (the good men getting left alone).

TLDR: Women are primal and do not make positive contributions to society thanks to that.

And the underpremise of all of this is that people are in search for more distinguishment, dominarchal leverage points. Women, and men are leverage collectors.
Women want people to blind to the truth. WOmen are wired to think of seizing everything and not caring for others. People are powerbent and they could use their resources for a more humanitarian resolution, but the primal nature of mankind would feel its pride compromised.

 

[Deleted member 4159]

Mog or be mogged.

 

[truthpill]

Women want people to blind to the truth.

Therefore virtue signalling and lying to not come off as the primal, ruthless and advantageous animals they really are

 

[needsolution]

Mog or be mogged.

being attractive or death