Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment The most prestigious fields depend more on innate talent

  • Thread starter Deleted member 23656
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 23656

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
4,137
Image 20150609 10689 w3s2p1


That's why despite doing better at "school" and getting higher gpas, females generally do worse in standardized tests as well as representation of high level at highly prestigious fields.

The reason is these fields don't just require effort but also innate talent to succeed. There is no teachers cock to suck nor are you rewarded for just completing your assignment on time. At the highest levels, only results matter.

So why am I posting this? Coz being able to fuck a lot of females (with out hookermaxxing) is considered prestigious no matter what you say.

So could it be to succeed at scoring with females, you need a lot of innate talent too ? Aka genetics

Just shows all your hard work won't matter much. Just like no matter how hard I work, I won't become Mozart or Aristotle

No matter how hard you work, you won't become genetically talented like Chad
 
Even plastic surgery won't make you Chad if you're incel. You need to be at least a 6 before plastic surgery to become a Chad
 
Even plastic surgery won't make you Chad if you're incel. You need to be at least a 6 before plastic surgery to become a Chad
The more Chad you are, the easier plastic surgery is.
 
>ART
>innate talent


JFL :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
Philosophy requires the most innate talent? I call bullshit
 
Basically foids succeed on universities because they suck professor's dick
 
I will never be at the top of any institutionalized field thats why i seek alternative hierarchies
 
No shit, everything in life comes down to talent AKA pure luck
 
So could it be to succeed at scoring with females, you need a lot of innate talent too ? Aka genetics
Just shows all your hard work won't matter much. Just like no matter how hard I work, I won't become Mozart or Aristotle
No matter how hard you work, you won't become genetically talented like Chad

There are almost no women in my field, as the graph attests. Hasn't mattered at all for me. I'd even say that if your discipline lacks the "sexy" factor, no one gives a damn what you do so long as you're PRODUCING something that makes their life cushier. Unless you're a god, that is.
 
LMFAO at philosophy

philosophy as a subject is pretty based and requires high IQ (notice very few women are earning PhDs in philosophy)
philosophy grads score the highest on GRE exams, even beating physics, mathematics, and economics grads

Gre 2019



yes the field is highly susceptible to pretentious nonsense, but it's probably the only field that can radically alter you entire worldview with a single book.
 
Last edited:
philosophy as a subject is pretty based and requires high IQ (notice very few women are getting PhDs in philosophy)
philosophy grads score the highest on GRE exams, even beating physics, mathematics, and economics grads

View attachment 191173


yes the field is highly susceptible to pretentious nonsense, but it's probably the only field that can radically alter you entire worldview with a single book.
The problem is there's no licensing exam to be a philosopher so you have all these morons claiming to be one.

The pink haired feminist is not one
Jordon Peterson is not one
Richard Dawkins is not one.

Saying they are the same as Aristotle or Kant is a huge insult.

Philosophy has insanely high verbal iq. Yet ironically it has very few females in it. Philosophy is about debate and saying why you are right and the other is wrong.

As we know females cannot handle debate so they resort to banning opposition. But you can't do that in philosophy. You have to beat your opponent the same way a boxer must best his opponent

I hear females whining about competitive philosophy and tried to change the structure. But the men using their superior facts and logic destroyed their arguments
 
Last edited:
The problem is there's no licensing exam to be a philosopher so you have all these morons claiming to be one.

The pink haired feminist is not one
Jordon Peterson is not one
Richard Dawkins is not one.

Saying they are the same as Aristotle or Kant is a huge insult

like most of humanities and art, barrier of entry is low but to be successful you have to insanely talented. anybody can claim to be a writer, musician or a film maker, but very few are actually good enough to be able to make a living off of it.
 
philosophy as a subject is pretty based and requires high IQ (notice very few women are earning PhDs in philosophy)
philosophy grads score the highest on GRE exams, even beating physics, mathematics, and economics grads

View attachment 191173


yes the field is highly susceptible to pretentious nonsense, but it's probably the only field that can radically alter you entire worldview with a single book.
I agree, Philosophy is extremely high IQ. People are really downplaying it here. However I wouldn't say it's the only field that can radically alter your entire worldview with a single book, Physics can do that as well.

Physics majors have the highest IQs in the US, but philosophy is third which is still good
1579231913814
 
I agree, Philosophy is extremely high IQ. People are really downplaying it here. However I wouldn't say it's the only field that can radically alter your entire worldview with a single book, Physics can do that as well.

Physics majors have the highest IQs in the US, but philosophy is third which is still good
View attachment 191177
If you go by pure Quant/Verbal scoring of the GRE (analytical writing is just another verbal part which of coz favours philosophy), Physics comes out on top.

Physics not only have almost top quant iq but they also have incredible high verbal iq. Hence the lack of foids in the field.

However to be a brain Chad you need to double major in BOTH Math/physics AND Philosophy. Then you IQmax in both areas.

Anyway Philosophy, math, physics... They all require insane innate talent and they all are mostly men.

This is the cruelty of the world. Innate talent plays a huge role. And so does building a harem of Stacies

Hard work will not save you either in IQmaxing or Chadmaxxing. The attraction market is a winner takes all field
 
Last edited:
I studied physics and the only subject I felt mogged by was pure mathematics. I also think that there's a huge difference between getting a good philosophy degree and being good at philosophy.
 
If you go by pure Quant/Verbal scoring of the GRE (analytical writing is just another verbal part which of coz favours philosophy), Physics comes out on top.

Physics not only have almost top quant iq but they also have incredible high verbal iq. Hence the lack of foids in the field.

However to be a brain Chad you need to double major in BOTH Math/physics AND Philosophy. Then you IQmax in both areas.

Anyway Philosophy, math, physics... They all require insane innate talent and they all are mostly men.

This is the cruelty of the world. Innate talent plays a huge role. And so does building a harem of Stacies

Hard work will not save you either in IQmaxing or Chadmaxxing. The attraction market is a winner takes all field

even hard working personality is highly heritable. I think it's called conscientiousness in psychology and most psychologists agree that you can't force a person with a laid back personality to be a workaholic. nothing in this world is free from genetic influence, which is the ultimate blackpill I would say
 
I got my first blackpill as a kid when I was watching Naruto and Neji mentioned how we are ultimately judged on things we cannot change. Intelligence, looks, and proficiency are mostly determined before we are even born and those dictate how we will fare in life.
 
I got my first blackpill as a kid when I was watching Naruto and Neji mentioned how we are ultimately judged on things we cannot change. Intelligence, looks, and proficiency are mostly determined before we are even born and those dictate how we will fare in life.
Naruto is so full of shit.

Hard work triumph all? Yeah man just be son of the 4th hokage and have the most powerful tailed beast inside you!
 
Naruto is so full of shit.

Hard work triumph all? Yeah man just be son of the 4th hokage and have the most powerful tailed beast inside you!
Yea the anime, like most anime, is bluepilled, but that one quote from Neji resonates with me. I do find it ironic how Naruto literally beat the bluepill into Neji only to validate everything Neji said later in life. Naruto had a clear message until Shippuden where the mangaka either got lazy, or the editors forced him to make Ninja Ball Z
 
If you go by pure Quant/Verbal scoring of the GRE (analytical writing is just another verbal part which of coz favours philosophy), Physics comes out on top.

Physics not only have almost top quant iq but they also have incredible high verbal iq. Hence the lack of foids in the field.

However to be a brain Chad you need to double major in BOTH Math/physics AND Philosophy. Then you IQmax in both areas.

Anyway Philosophy, math, physics... They all require insane innate talent and they all are mostly men.

This is the cruelty of the world. Innate talent plays a huge role. And so does building a harem of Stacies

Hard work will not save you either in IQmaxing or Chadmaxxing. The attraction market is a winner takes all field

Overall a very high IQ comment. I agree with what you say about the requirements for being a brain Chad. I am hoping to excel in both physics and philosophy to IQmax as much as possible since its the only thing I have to do in life anyway.
 
Yea the anime, like most anime, is bluepilled, but that one quote from Neji resonates with me. I do find it ironic how Naruto literally beat the bluepill into Neji only to validate everything Neji said later in life. Naruto had a clear message until Shippuden where the mangaka either got lazy, or the editors forced him to make Ninja Ball Z
It was pretty spot on with Sakura though. She was obsessed with Sasuke , All because of his looks and status event though he only saw her as a teammate , treated her very poorly at times and she was treating Naruto poorly. Sasuke even insulted her for talking about how lonely Naruto is , because he's alone too. Even after that , Sakura rejected Naruto's offers of spending time together when she knew he was lonely and Naruto actually showed interest. He saved her many times and became a hero and she still wasn't attracted to him , Even tried to manipulate him with his feelings towards her. Naruto was a good guy. Fuck , Even Rock Lee tried to save her and almost dies , Still nothing , She wanted Chad Uchicha's dick. Sasuke was even abusing , But that didn't mattered , she was still attracted to him. The writer was aware of how foids worl
 
Philosphy, mathematics, and physics have always been the high IQ kings of university subjects.

Philosophy gets a bad rep for a lot of reasons, but at the highest level of philosophy it gets insanely abstract. The problems of language compound this problem, which is partly why many people erroneously believe that they can proficiently philosophize.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top