Picture a 7/10 and an 8/10 male in your head, their difference in attractiveness is much more clear than the difference between 7/10 and 8/10 females.
If you compare a 7/10 male to a 10/10 male, it’s a nuclear grade giga mog, but between female 7/10s and 10/10s, men would actually debate over who is more attractive because certain features override the whole picture when men are determining attractiveness in females. For example, a 7/10 could have double D boobs but the 10/10 could have C cups and many men would prefer the 7/10.
There are no trivial differences between a 7/10 and 10/10 man like the size of your boobs or ass, the 10/10 man looks like a Roman bust with every trait hand sculpted to perfection, the 7/10 man has no obvious facial flaws and is average in height. To put it mathematically, the difference in SMV between a 7 and 10 female is about 43%, but for a man it is easily around 1000%, examples:
Maher and Meeks are not even 10/10 but they make Gordon Levitt look like an incel, for females the difference is this:
If you can’t decide whether aryan Stacy or noodlestacy is way more attractive, or if you think they’re are quite similarly attractive, it’s proof the female looks scale is linear. The noodle has an objectively bad eye area, whereas the aryan Stacy has negative canthal tilt, the noodle also has subtle facial asymmetries yet is a professional model, if a man had facial asymmetries with a bad eye area he is a normie at best.
If you compare a 7/10 male to a 10/10 male, it’s a nuclear grade giga mog, but between female 7/10s and 10/10s, men would actually debate over who is more attractive because certain features override the whole picture when men are determining attractiveness in females. For example, a 7/10 could have double D boobs but the 10/10 could have C cups and many men would prefer the 7/10.
There are no trivial differences between a 7/10 and 10/10 man like the size of your boobs or ass, the 10/10 man looks like a Roman bust with every trait hand sculpted to perfection, the 7/10 man has no obvious facial flaws and is average in height. To put it mathematically, the difference in SMV between a 7 and 10 female is about 43%, but for a man it is easily around 1000%, examples:
Maher and Meeks are not even 10/10 but they make Gordon Levitt look like an incel, for females the difference is this:
If you can’t decide whether aryan Stacy or noodlestacy is way more attractive, or if you think they’re are quite similarly attractive, it’s proof the female looks scale is linear. The noodle has an objectively bad eye area, whereas the aryan Stacy has negative canthal tilt, the noodle also has subtle facial asymmetries yet is a professional model, if a man had facial asymmetries with a bad eye area he is a normie at best.
Last edited:
