ProudIncelistani
Son of Incelistan
-
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
- Posts
- 4,301
This is how normies and cucks have (quite accidentally) proven Hypergamy right!
Keep in mind I'm still thinking on how to improve this, hence the [Experiment] Thread.
HYPERGAMY:
When the normie/cuck tells you to improve your personality, confidence or anything like that, it's for a (highly deluded) reason. They think that THIS is the path to Increasing your SMV. But in doing so, they have pointed the gun at themselves, as they, in doing so, have acknowledged the following:
When you are told to 'lower your standards', you are being given a stark reminder of both Hypergamy in general and the Juggernaut's law in specific.
How so?
Let's take a test case, how about straight from r/IncelTears?
In this comic, we can see our complaint of female standards and racism, choosing only the best (White).
In the comments, you will see such:
Here, from the comments section of the post meant to ridicule said comic, you can see males (particularly non-whites, such as myself), being chastised for having the SAME preferences as their female counterparts. They are then recommended the idea of 'lowering their standards' and dating within their own race. (Keep in mind the comment itself is incorrect, race isn't a boundary for most of us here).
What does it show us?
It shows that there is a clear dating market that is aligned within the Hypergamy model.
How so?
In this test case, ethnic men (perceived to be of an inferior standard) are told to go after ethnic women (also perceived to be of an inferior standard, hence the 'lowering' and not 'increasing' of standards!), while White men (perceived to be of a superior breed, both by the comment and comic, as he is exempt from the criticisms of the comment and the 'harsh reality' presented by the comic), and women of ALL races have not been given such advice. Such quite easily screams 'Hypergamy!' at any observer of the system presented. In addition, ethnic women, both being perceived as inferior but not having being given the comment's advice, are thus able to pairbond with men of ALL racial qualities while white women, being perceived to be superior but not having received such advice, may feel 'entitled' to a white man, as they are at the alleged highest quality of the Dating market, thus FAR likely to take an ethnic partner, such showing the Juggernaut's Law: If the specimen is female, the lower their quality in the market, the more options they have and are likely to select within the time they have. Higher quality specimen are less likely to select lower quality mates.
Hence, from the normie POV, Hypergamy and the Juggernaut's law are alive and well!
This was a bit of a thinker and I'm still wondering on how to improve. Let's see how IT reacts to this by actually getting it there for one ffs.
Good Yard.
Keep in mind I'm still thinking on how to improve this, hence the [Experiment] Thread.
HYPERGAMY:
When the normie/cuck tells you to improve your personality, confidence or anything like that, it's for a (highly deluded) reason. They think that THIS is the path to Increasing your SMV. But in doing so, they have pointed the gun at themselves, as they, in doing so, have acknowledged the following:
- There is a rank of men in the dating market, and women will choose the highest. Hence they (incorrectly) tell you to improve yourself in the aspects they mentioned to be on the highest of that market, so you have the preference of the highest number of women.
- Human Society is not at a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, as if it was, women and men would have no preferences, hence the good-bad personality wouldn't exist! (It runs on genetics instead!) If it were so, in their world, women would NOT leave abusers for good people, misogynists for good people, etc.
- Such DOES NOT apply to women, as you have to raise your SMV to appease a woman to get her to select you, not some random process where you get to choose to a degree what you want.
When you are told to 'lower your standards', you are being given a stark reminder of both Hypergamy in general and the Juggernaut's law in specific.
How so?
Let's take a test case, how about straight from r/IncelTears?
In this comic, we can see our complaint of female standards and racism, choosing only the best (White).
In the comments, you will see such:
Here, from the comments section of the post meant to ridicule said comic, you can see males (particularly non-whites, such as myself), being chastised for having the SAME preferences as their female counterparts. They are then recommended the idea of 'lowering their standards' and dating within their own race. (Keep in mind the comment itself is incorrect, race isn't a boundary for most of us here).
What does it show us?
It shows that there is a clear dating market that is aligned within the Hypergamy model.
How so?
In this test case, ethnic men (perceived to be of an inferior standard) are told to go after ethnic women (also perceived to be of an inferior standard, hence the 'lowering' and not 'increasing' of standards!), while White men (perceived to be of a superior breed, both by the comment and comic, as he is exempt from the criticisms of the comment and the 'harsh reality' presented by the comic), and women of ALL races have not been given such advice. Such quite easily screams 'Hypergamy!' at any observer of the system presented. In addition, ethnic women, both being perceived as inferior but not having being given the comment's advice, are thus able to pairbond with men of ALL racial qualities while white women, being perceived to be superior but not having received such advice, may feel 'entitled' to a white man, as they are at the alleged highest quality of the Dating market, thus FAR likely to take an ethnic partner, such showing the Juggernaut's Law: If the specimen is female, the lower their quality in the market, the more options they have and are likely to select within the time they have. Higher quality specimen are less likely to select lower quality mates.
Hence, from the normie POV, Hypergamy and the Juggernaut's law are alive and well!
This was a bit of a thinker and I'm still wondering on how to improve. Let's see how IT reacts to this by actually getting it there for one ffs.
Good Yard.
Last edited: