Batch codes appear to represent different levels of toxicity, suggesting that the batches have been labelled with batch codes for the purpose of distinguishing one toxic level from another.
What can explain this all-or-nothing variation?
Perhaps the batches with low adverse reactions are the placebo/control group. It has been suggested that they are merely misspellings of the highly toxic batches, and therefore they dont really exist. In other words, some people have suggested that all the batches are equally toxic and there are no placebos. Therefore, they conclude that the batches with low adverse reaction numbers must be simply mis-spellings of the toxic batches.
In order to investigate this, I made a list of all of the batch codes with low adverse reaction numbers for the EL series. The correct format for these batches should be EL followed by 4 digits. I eliminated all batch codes without this format. I was left with 360 batch codes with the correct format but simply with low adverse reactions. These batch codes fell into distinct mathematical series also, and these series were very distinct from the toxic series, for example
Analysis of the low toxicity series will undoubtedly reveal some systematisation in the numbers and ranges of these lots. Placebos, just like biologically active lots, would not be issued randomly or without design.
There were 18 highly toxic batches in the EL series, and 360 low toxic batches. So the ratio of bad batches to good batches is 18: 360 or 1 : 20. Keeping bad batches at the 5% level will keep them just beneath the radar of perception.
If 1 in 20 lots are toxic, and if each person has two vaccine shots each year, then -
Of course, this assumes that the % of batches that are super-toxic remains constant at 5%.
The toxicity of a poison can be determined by its lethality - the % of people who die after taking it. In the PDF document below, I examine the Pfizer series to see how lethality varies from lot to lot.
What can explain this all-or-nothing variation?
Perhaps the batches with low adverse reactions are the placebo/control group. It has been suggested that they are merely misspellings of the highly toxic batches, and therefore they dont really exist. In other words, some people have suggested that all the batches are equally toxic and there are no placebos. Therefore, they conclude that the batches with low adverse reaction numbers must be simply mis-spellings of the toxic batches.
In order to investigate this, I made a list of all of the batch codes with low adverse reaction numbers for the EL series. The correct format for these batches should be EL followed by 4 digits. I eliminated all batch codes without this format. I was left with 360 batch codes with the correct format but simply with low adverse reactions. These batch codes fell into distinct mathematical series also, and these series were very distinct from the toxic series, for example
Analysis of the low toxicity series will undoubtedly reveal some systematisation in the numbers and ranges of these lots. Placebos, just like biologically active lots, would not be issued randomly or without design.
There were 18 highly toxic batches in the EL series, and 360 low toxic batches. So the ratio of bad batches to good batches is 18: 360 or 1 : 20. Keeping bad batches at the 5% level will keep them just beneath the radar of perception.
If 1 in 20 lots are toxic, and if each person has two vaccine shots each year, then -
Of course, this assumes that the % of batches that are super-toxic remains constant at 5%.
The toxicity of a poison can be determined by its lethality - the % of people who die after taking it. In the PDF document below, I examine the Pfizer series to see how lethality varies from lot to lot.
